Tiffany Thinks #16 🎄🎄🎄

Status
Thread locked. We start a new thread when they have over 1000 posts, click the blue button to see all threads for this topic and find the latest open thread.
I will never believe she is a calculated monster as many others on here feel she is. It's been frustrating following her as I do care about her, and naturally would like to know how she's doing, but I can accept the way she's handled things. I do believe she's a good person with a good heart and I can only feel sympathy for all she's going through. This is a tremendous and unimaginable amount to go through by anyone's account. She was obviously in denial and trying not to focus on the reality of the situation. She should have been in counseling, but unfortunately she didn't take that road. Sadly, this will end up being more difficult on her because of that. I just hope she will be ok.

I don't think she's a monster. I think she is a very ill, misguided young woman. She tried for nearly a decade to be internet famous. During that time, she developed a lot of clickbait savvy, you can see she tried numerous ways for years, but nothing really took off. I see the tools she uses when I read Tattle's details of how "influencers" work. Tiffany has it down pat, she's honed her skills for years. Then cancer took over her life. Suddenly, she had a successful vehicle to attract an audience.

All those skills and ambitions married perfectly with her newfound popularity, she simply implemented and unrolled the YT playbook in seamless fashion: merch, engaging viewers, sponsors, product links, po box, suspenseful titles and imagery, choreographed content, etc.

Unfortunately, that playbook clashes when the subject matter is cancer. She discovered this when she asked for opinions, on her health decision and not what we preferred for dinner. She received a deluge of contrary professional and experienced opinions that were suddenly not supportive. She had to roll that back, then figure out how to dampen the criticisms and expectations that occurred when she naively sought to increase subscriber engagement. Damage control was aggressive, she encouraged subs to do her dirty work so she could maintain her sweet persona.

I don't think she's evil, I think she applied an incorrect YT modus operandi and never revisited or revised it beyond attempts to restrain viewer comments. She realized subs actually demanded information on a cancer channel...deeply personal and medical information. They were invested. That was not where she was going, she wanted people to ask her where to buy her lip gloss or gonks, not ask her if she would have one stoma or two. She wanted to model designer clothing. This conflict between what she wanted to be and what her subs were expecting only increased, that's why it became quite ugly as she retreated from private info and expanded her extraneous, lifestyle focus, yet continued to receive more and more push back.

But, now she's successful, how can she not want to continue her playbook even if she's resistant to sharing her cancer journey beyond the most basic and superficial? Of course the pull is there to continue the rollout of her plan: sympathy translates into gifts, undying support and enduring subs! She merely course corrects when people call her out for her schemes. She has a successful commercial operation and her longstanding dream of internet stardom has been realized. She's even got a Tattle section devoted exclusively to her! People are talking about her outside her YT channel!

She's "arrived" at what she worked nearly a decade for: internet notoriety and the title of "influencer". She is not giving it up. She will continue to segue back into lifestyle while capitalising on the "cancer" title that brought her the audience. All she sees, naively, is that people care for her and want her to be well and happy. She believes she's providing what they want, even if cancer details are as scant as she can offer yet still get away with using the clickbait title. She selectively reads her comments; there are enough peeps who support her, and an increasing # of subs, that she feels comfortable in her approach.

I think, in her dyadic and conflicting focuses: one, her very serious cancer and impending surgery; and two, maintaining her YT channel to greatest effect during this period, I don't think she has been in deep consideration about manipulation or deceit or any psychoanalysis of her actions, even the deleterious impact of neglecting to focus more on her health has not been thought through. She's still in YT playbook mode and the rolling out of the standard commercial plan although she remains unwilling to turn herself into a cancer case study. She wants to be famous for her personality and life vlogging. This popularity must be intoxicating.

That's why I personally don't think she's evil or a monster. I think she's misguided and imprudent and thoughtless. And sadly, she's taken a lot of sincere people for a ride on her rise to internet prominence, all the while not taking care of her health as well as she should.

And evidently, Elodie also wasn't prepared for the avalanche of people fervently desirous of a status update on Tiffany!
 
I hope to god Elodie hasn’t decided to delete the comments and story because Tiffany has declined or worse. It takes much more effort to create a story on Instagram than to just reply to only ONE of the comments about Tiffany on Ella’s photo with “Tiffany is doing ok” … why not save your effort and just do that. They’re enjoying this suspense. Makes my sympathy hard to give.
 
No, that must have been one of the copycat foxes. I definitely was the original fluffy fox poster but it doesn’t matter to me if you don’t believe me. My YouTube account has been active for many years. If yo
*had been. The original fluffy fox has since closed their account, active since 2013, the year their dog Sully Fox was born. But you would know that of course, being the original fox and all...
Ok whatever. I’m not arguing with you. I have never had a dog and I’m not Australian. I think you got the wrong person. I’m from London. How do you explain the old comments now showing my new name if the account was deleted?
 
Ok whatever. I’m not arguing with you. I have never had a dog and I’m not Australian. I think you got the wrong person. I’m from London. How do you explain the old comments now showing my new name if the account was deleted?
perhaps because you were one of a pack of foxes, but not the first? if you are a real fox, answer me this 🕵️‍♀️ ...are you more closely related to a dog ...or a cat?

p.s. curious that you are not Australian but are called Worry Wombat. In London they have worry warts (and castles), but not wombats.
 
From the SU2C video. This thread is interesting.
 

Attachments

  • SU2C.PNG
    SU2C.PNG
    73.9 KB · Views: 53
I don't think she's a monster. I think she is a very ill, misguided young woman. She tried for nearly a decade to be internet famous. During that time, she developed a lot of clickbait savvy, you can see she tried numerous ways for years, but nothing really took off. I see the tools she uses when I read Tattle's details of how "influencers" work. Tiffany has it down pat, she's honed her skills for years. Then cancer took over her life. Suddenly, she had a successful vehicle to attract an audience.

All those skills and ambitions married perfectly with her newfound popularity, she simply implemented and unrolled the YT playbook in seamless fashion: merch, engaging viewers, sponsors, product links, po box, suspenseful titles and imagery, choreographed content, etc.

Unfortunately, that playbook clashes when the subject matter is cancer. She discovered this when she asked for opinions, on her health decision and not what we preferred for dinner. She received a deluge of contrary professional and experienced opinions that were suddenly not supportive. She had to roll that back, then figure out how to dampen the criticisms and expectations that occurred when she naively sought to increase subscriber engagement. Damage control was aggressive, she encouraged subs to do her dirty work so she could maintain her sweet persona.

I don't think she's evil, I think she applied an incorrect YT modus operandi and never revisited or revised it beyond attempts to restrain viewer comments. She realized subs actually demanded information on a cancer channel...deeply personal and medical information. They were invested. That was not where she was going, she wanted people to ask her where to buy her lip gloss or gonks, not ask her if she would have one stoma or two. She wanted to model designer clothing. This conflict between what she wanted to be and what her subs were expecting only increased, that's why it became quite ugly as she retreated from private info and expanded her extraneous, lifestyle focus, yet continued to receive more and more push back.

But, now she's successful, how can she not want to continue her playbook even if she's resistant to sharing her cancer journey beyond the most basic and superficial? Of course the pull is there to continue the rollout of her plan: sympathy translates into gifts, undying support and enduring subs! She merely course corrects when people call her out for her schemes. She has a successful commercial operation and her longstanding dream of internet stardom has been realized. She's even got a Tattle section devoted exclusively to her! People are talking about her outside her YT channel!

She's "arrived" at what she worked nearly a decade for: internet notoriety and the title of "influencer". She is not giving it up. She will continue to segue back into lifestyle while capitalising on the "cancer" title that brought her the audience. All she sees, naively, is that people care for her and want her to be well and happy. She believes she's providing what they want, even if cancer details are as scant as she can offer yet still get away with using the clickbait title. She selectively reads her comments; there are enough peeps who support her, and an increasing # of subs, that she feels comfortable in her approach.

I think, in her dyadic and conflicting focuses: one, her very serious cancer and impending surgery; and two, maintaining her YT channel to greatest effect during this period, I don't think she has been in deep consideration about manipulation or deceit or any psychoanalysis of her actions, even the deleterious impact of neglecting to focus more on her health has not been thought through. She's still in YT playbook mode and the rolling out of the standard commercial plan although she remains unwilling to turn herself into a cancer case study. She wants to be famous for her personality and life vlogging. This popularity must be intoxicating.

That's why I personally don't think she's evil or a monster. I think she's misguided and imprudent and thoughtless. And sadly, she's taken a lot of sincere people for a ride on her rise to internet prominence, all the while not taking care of her health as well as she should.

And evidently, Elodie also wasn't prepared for the avalanche of people fervently desirous of a status update on Tiffany!
Absolutely 👏🏽👏🏽👏🏽🙌🏾🙌🏾🙌🏾 💯 🎯
I’ll never forget when she jumped up and down squealing at the thought of getting 100k followers and the YouTube plaque…
Then backtracked after her family gave her a 50k follower party because she realised cancer vlogs and the focus on getting a YouTube plaque seemed quite unprincipled…
 
perhaps because you were one of a pack of foxes, but not the first? if you are a real fox, answer me this 🕵️‍♀️ ...are you more closely related to a dog ...or a cat?

p.s. curious that you are not Australian but are called Worry Wombat. In London they have worry warts (and castles), but not wombats.
The original Fluffy Fox, a great while ago, actually wrote 'Wombat' under someone's perceived-to-be mean comment a long time before the counterfeit animal parade materialized. Therefore, it does not surprise me that the original Fluffy Fox would then choose a wombat as a pseudonym. We may have here, in our very presence, the one and only, original Fluffy Fox!!
 
Death is possible - the mortality rate calculated for PE is reported as the % of people who die during the surgery or in the 30 days after surgery. Blood clots after surgery kill some people.

there was a young girl early twenties reported on one of the earlier threads who suffered a stroke in recovery and Natalie had sepsis which nearly killed her and they looked in much better condition going into this op than T..
that c-diff that T had was really bad timing and took a lot out of her..the weight loss alone in the recovery from this op puts T at more risk unfortunately
 
The original Fluffy Fox, a great while ago, actually wrote 'Wombat' under someone's perceived-to-be mean comment a long time before the counterfeit animal parade materialized. Therefore, it does not surprise me that the original Fluffy Fox would then choose a wombat as a pseudonym. We may have here, in our very presence, the one and only, original Fluffy Fox!!
The original fluffyfox2534 is almost definitely an Australian woman with a dog named Sully, whose instagram profile can be found quite easily on a basic search on Tiffany's page using the aforementioned clues. She actually replied to a comment I once left a long, long time ago on Tiffany's page...way before there were any counterfeits around! She later deleted the comment, but it still appears on my notifications so I still have a link to her now-deleted YT page. It first changed to "fluffy fox has left the building" and then the YT account got deleted entirely. Soon after the Wombat appeared.
 
there was a young girl early twenties reported on one of the earlier threads who suffered a stroke in recovery and Natalie had sepsis which nearly killed her and they looked in much better condition going into this op than T..
that c-diff that T had was really bad timing and took a lot out of her..the weight loss alone in the recovery from this op puts T at more risk unfortunately
I have been shocked reading about the amount of weight some patients have lost after having PE. I understand parenteral nutrition infusions can be done but I have no idea whether they might prevent dangerous weight loss.
 
It means Tiffany has a 39% of reaching the 5 year survival rate. More probable that she won’t be alive anytime in that 5 year timeline.
Wait what? 😳
Well I hope she lives and is part of the 39% that makes it…
It’s so sad … Tiffany just didn’t listen, she didn’t deal with her alleged ED or poor eating habits.. she deleted my ( and many others) comments when I encouraged her to see a therapist ASAP, increase her vitamins, stop eating crap and exercise…it’s so sad 😞
 
Last edited:
Oh my god but people keep asking about Tiffany in her IG comments she deleted some but there are some new ones already ! Is she going to delete comments for days and days 😅 I don’t understand why she didn’t go private like a while ago ! She knew that it was coming … I am sorry I don’t understand …
She should just post a bleeping update and shut everybody up .wtf is wrong with these people? It's not that deep ffs.
Why do they have to keep this a secret as if Tiffany is some sort of big celebrity and they have to protect her public image.
 
Status
Thread locked. We start a new thread when they have over 1000 posts, click the blue button to see all threads for this topic and find the latest open thread.
Back
Top