TheNurseMum #9 The nurse purse mum, on the sesh in Marrakesh

Status
Thread locked. We start a new thread when they have over 1000 posts, click the blue button to see all threads for this topic and find the latest open thread.
Luckily not Seen anybody yet wearing one whilst out . I don’t think it’s appropriate at all I commented on the page and reported it so many times we all have but nothing happens . legally She can’t be stopped but I don’t understand why she wants to carry on and not just let him rest now he’s gone and let everyone grieve . The issue is if visit the grave and strangers are at the grave how will one react because tensions are high and I don’t think it would go down very well so right now his father is putting off going and that’s sad , what kind of witch invites strangers to a child’s grave 😞
 
I think she might be putting items on that don’t involve photos of jaxon after the argument this weekend . Legally she does not have his fathers permission and jaxon was his son too . But knowing kaytee she thinks she is untouchable so more than likely has done T-shirt’s with different photos of him on !!!!
I really hope she takes down the products with his photo..
 
She sounds awful. Very vindictive & manipulative & if I was Js dad, after the absolute tit show she has pulled for the last “3 years, 9 months & 8 days”, I would want to do everything I could to ruin her life! She is truly shameless & feels like she can walk on water. Shes been pleading poverty, making out like shes some hard done by single mum thats never had a boyfriend & has zero support. She’s had over 50k in free money & still begged for free coffees while in hospital. Free disability car that was more for her than it was for Jaxon then had a meltdown when it got took off her. i mean, i could go on but she thinks all this is fine. She doesn’t see anything wrong with her actions.

I would want to ruin her if I was on Js dads side. Imagine your son being dead & using it as a means to capitalise. Absolutely sick in the head! She thinks she’s bigger than she is too, mate its just instagram. No one gives a tit who you are outside of insta.
 
This is how much Out of reality she is £32 for a pair of shorts with 398 on like anybody will even know what it means it’s personal to her nobody else 🤦‍♀️ Nike dont Even charge that price and that’s a huge brand .
 

Attachments

  • 396DF05F-8E68-41E2-8F59-797B3C6D5ADF.png
    396DF05F-8E68-41E2-8F59-797B3C6D5ADF.png
    38.4 KB · Views: 463
Just so you all know . Not only is this women going behind jaxons fathers wishes and carrying on making money from his death she is also ripping people off . NIKE ADIDAS UNDER ARMOUR are all big brands that have been around for many years and good quality clothing and they are not even charging that much for a pair of shorts . The T-shirt’s with the numbers 398 you can have personalised T-shirt’s printed for as little as 2.99 she is charging £25 again she is using cheap material plus postage !! She’s a fraud and a absolute disgrace to carry this on !!!
 

Attachments

  • D640002F-6BCE-457C-B0D0-599365281815.jpeg
    D640002F-6BCE-457C-B0D0-599365281815.jpeg
    19 KB · Views: 185
  • FC5D29F0-6219-4A13-B489-73E9DE2124E1.jpeg
    FC5D29F0-6219-4A13-B489-73E9DE2124E1.jpeg
    27.7 KB · Views: 196
  • F0A664E4-3560-4B32-B425-F7400B7C4DAC.jpeg
    F0A664E4-3560-4B32-B425-F7400B7C4DAC.jpeg
    18 KB · Views: 187
  • 9AAE4981-8CA9-4590-8451-F8662D871CC1.png
    9AAE4981-8CA9-4590-8451-F8662D871CC1.png
    59.4 KB · Views: 206
  • 3753031B-0DD0-4700-84F7-2951DA0BAD22.png
    3753031B-0DD0-4700-84F7-2951DA0BAD22.png
    87.5 KB · Views: 178
  • 39517200-0285-48C1-8BA4-6029E574DE40.png
    39517200-0285-48C1-8BA4-6029E574DE40.png
    60.2 KB · Views: 138
She was making £4.50 profit on a £19 tshirt, i wonder how much profit she is making off the shorts. Just checked, she makes £4.50 off £30 shorts.
 
I’m really annoyed if I’m honest tonight more because she is carrying this tit show on when it’s in bad taste and not what people wants!!! She’s charging £54 for a men’s short set plain black just with the numbers 398 . BOOHOO man is a popular website they are charging just £17 some are cheaper for a men’s shorts set . KAYTEE IS CHARGING £22 for a plain vest with 398 on it plus postage bringing it to £26 for a bloody vest !! BOOHOO MAN charge just 3.50 for their brand logo vests plus free delivery sometimes . I mean she’s robbing people blind not only is it based on a child who is no longer here and against family’s wishes she’s fina profiting from it all whilst ripping people off !!! These big brands make Millions and don’t charge the price she is
 

Attachments

  • 3B4703D7-CFB0-4C58-8227-558E389CF8A0.png
    3B4703D7-CFB0-4C58-8227-558E389CF8A0.png
    38.5 KB · Views: 74
  • 9C5D391E-CA27-497B-B801-EB914BF05654.png
    9C5D391E-CA27-497B-B801-EB914BF05654.png
    42.4 KB · Views: 86
  • D8395B99-4336-4C78-A99B-E7D9B08DF9B8.jpeg
    D8395B99-4336-4C78-A99B-E7D9B08DF9B8.jpeg
    43.5 KB · Views: 85
  • 62C01985-A674-4C3A-8414-FDF5CEB9F03A.png
    62C01985-A674-4C3A-8414-FDF5CEB9F03A.png
    62.1 KB · Views: 70
  • A16A6699-5E9D-4C6D-8FF3-FF449F551B0A.png
    A16A6699-5E9D-4C6D-8FF3-FF449F551B0A.png
    78.5 KB · Views: 79
  • FC7698AA-DE6B-451C-8AAF-2BEC00ED2529.png
    FC7698AA-DE6B-451C-8AAF-2BEC00ED2529.png
    34.1 KB · Views: 74
Just so you all know . Not only is this women going behind jaxons fathers wishes and carrying on making money from his death she is also ripping people off . NIKE ADIDAS UNDER ARMOUR are all big brands that have been around for many years and good quality clothing and they are not even charging that much for a pair of shorts . The T-shirt’s with the numbers 398 you can have personalised T-shirt’s printed for as little as 2.99 she is charging £25 again she is using cheap material plus postage !! She’s a fraud and a absolute disgrace to carry this on !!!
Hardly surprising with Kathleen is it. Is she still selling the T-shirt’s with Js face and Amgel wings on? I can’t imagine how distressing this all must be for the dad and family if this isn’t what they want 😪
 
I’m really annoyed if I’m honest tonight more because she is carrying this tit show on when it’s in bad taste and not what people wants!!! She’s charging £54 for a men’s short set plain black just with the numbers 398 . BOOHOO man is a popular website they are charging just £17 some are cheaper for a men’s shorts set . KAYTEE IS CHARGING £22 for a plain vest with 398 on it plus postage bringing it to £26 for a bloody vest !! BOOHOO MAN charge just 3.50 for their brand logo vests plus free delivery sometimes . I mean she’s robbing people blind not only is it based on a child who is no longer here and against family’s wishes she’s fina profiting from it all whilst ripping people off !!! These big brands make Millions and don’t charge the price she is

Well yeah, because she’s using a white label on demand printing service, which is basically the most expensive way you can possibly produce anything (the fewer you print / make, the greater the per unit cost). She’s having to sell at ridiculous prices because each unit costs a ridiculous price to produce - but it’s also the absolute laziest path of least resistance imaginable, which is why she’s picked it.

She could make far greater profits at lower sale costs if she put some work into self-producing, but that would require actually doing some work.
 
I wonder if there’s any legalities if J’s dad wasn’t happy with her selling photos of Jaxon on merch?

If I was him I would let her crack on with all the numbers stuff but I would draw the line at allowing my child’s mum to ‘mass produce’ (if we can call it that) t-shirts with Jaxons image on in order to make a profit.

I seriously wonder if you could make a legal case out of it.
 
I seriously wonder if you could make a legal case out of it.
I don’t think they can. I remember reading about a case of a celeb (I think maybe Rihanna but this could be wrong) and a paparazzi took a photo that ended up on some widely selling shirt somewhere and she didn’t get a single penny and couldn’t do anything about it, because she didn’t own the copyright of the photo even though it was her face
 
I don’t think they can. I remember reading about a case of a celeb (I think maybe Rihanna but this could be wrong) and a paparazzi took a photo that ended up on some widely selling shirt somewhere and she didn’t get a single penny and couldn’t do anything about it, because she didn’t own the copyright of the photo even though it was her face

Ah I remember… that’s true… slightly different when the photo in question is that of a minor though I wonder if that changes things 🤷‍♀️
 
I don’t think they can. I remember reading about a case of a celeb (I think maybe Rihanna but this could be wrong) and a paparazzi took a photo that ended up on some widely selling shirt somewhere and she didn’t get a single penny and couldn’t do anything about it, because she didn’t own the copyright of the photo even though it was her face
I remember this, I think it was Topshop!
 
Unfortunately not . But you would think she had some form of respect for him Being jaxons father . Does she have no feelings at all . This is what we face with her day in day out . She’s a narcissistic manipulative soul and always has been . Sell the 398 if it makes her happy but stop the T-shirt’s with his face and jaxons gang . let him rest in peace
 
Status
Thread locked. We start a new thread when they have over 1000 posts, click the blue button to see all threads for this topic and find the latest open thread.
Back
Top