HalcyonOrganic
VIP Member
Going to bed is really a good idea Amaury. I’ll wait there.
The Chateau Diaries #319 No more pink eye? Keep your dog's testies and arse out of your face, Stephanie!
- Thread starter ComtesseRose
- Start date
-
- Tags
- the chateau diaries
- Status
1
I’m not new
JackSpratt
VIP Member
He could have had underlying hereditary health problems but in all honesty this has been a case of neglect.
He was never cared for correctly and respectfully from day one, it was all there to witness.
He was treated no better than an accessory, at worse a toy.
A poor innocent who was monetized in life and now will be monetized in death.
Jeeves
VIP Member
Perhaps, but we only have Fanny's word for what happened. Remember how a consultant physician allegedly misdiagnosed Percy? It seems to be the Jarvis method of avoiding blame for their failure to seek timely medical advice. I wonder if there ever was a first vet or did Fanny and Snorts feel that it was an insect sting and leave it, thinking it would settle down, until it became apparent that it was an emergency and were forced to take Lancelot to the vet who diagnosed the problem.
Lady Lindy
VIP Member
That's exactly what I think happened!!! It was always my fear when stupid Fanny danced around with the poor puppy on her head
---
No. Fanny was just lying. She knew one of them had dropped him and his rib had punctured his lung or wind pipe
KitKat_theNewRat
Active member
I think so too. Or he ate something he wasn't supposed that punctured his throat internally. I feel like Steph and Phiphi know exactly what happened but simply ignored it. And when the vet(s) asked them what happened they pretended to be ignorant. It's so negligent.No. Fanny was just lying. She knew one of them had dropped him and his rib had punctured his lung or wind pipe
vitanova
VIP Member
there was an accident while they were fixing heating at the shitow
jojonz
Chatty Member
Creature, CREATURE, its not english as a second language here its how he viewed the pupy he always wanted!!!
GRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRh I can say anymore. Philip from mr google You can refer to any living thing that is not a plant as a creature, especially when it is of an unknown or unfamiliar kind. People also refer to imaginary animals and beings as creatures.
Piip isnt a creature he is a CREEPTURD
Last edited:
Iolair
VIP Member
Congratulations!
Your post of "Sure.... whatever..." is top contender for the inaugural Tattler Award as the most Weak as Piss and Twice as Yellow Award for 'the weakest most pathetic response made by a CD Tattler since the opening of these threads.' Should your post be accepted for the top prize, you could be in the running for one of the following awards!
1/ An entire wardrobe of Mummy's castoffs, including dresses, shoes and bags, as modeled by Philip Jansen.
2/ An intermitent diet plan where you only get to eat during guest dinners; created and half baked by pretend chef Marie.
3/ A 6 month romantic getaway to lieLande as the special guest of, and sharing a room with, Philip Jansen.
But wait, there's more!
Should you be unsuccessful in taking out one of the top prizes, you could also be in the running for the consolation prize of...
50 litres of cheap vinegar left over French plonk from Fanny's Patreon Days that no-one else in their right mind would ever drink!
Fingers crossed!
Last edited:
shatcho shiek
VIP Member
note the following photos of what I observe and are calling out dupers delight and ensuring a look at the camera for impact of effective emotional manipulation ..... despicable....
+
narrative preparation note Hand goes up to hold in laughter, then
lastly we have the looking at the camera , did I do well and are you buying it? this is my subjective opinion and observations based on experience from these types ...
+
narrative preparation note Hand goes up to hold in laughter, then
lastly we have the looking at the camera , did I do well and are you buying it? this is my subjective opinion and observations based on experience from these types ...
Attachments
Fleur du mal
Chatty Member
She couldn't mention the death of her chickens for months but has no problem throwing out an entire vlog about Ratso's passing?! Vile CREATURE! 
graciemckitten
VIP Member
IMHO, the first vet did nothing wrong. It was likely acting in accordance with acceptable standards of reasonable veterinary medicine practice under the circumstances in this situation.
Phillip or Fanny probably yanked on his tight neck collar and caused a blunt force injury to the dog’s windpipe. It is a 5 or 6 pound fragile dog with fragile bones.The gruesome twosome treated the dog roughly and manhandled it like a piece of trash. Phillip could’ve been yanking and dragging the dog again at a reststop when the dog had to use the bathroom or the dog got choked in the car or yanked by its collar in the car because it was improperly attached to the console or yank the dogs collar as they were getting out of the car or it was peeing outside because they were excited to get to the rental home. They have been repeatedly warned by viewers not to use the neck collar on the dog, and use a harness instead. They had a harness, but were too lazy to use one. The collar was already tight around the dogs neck, and it would take very little swelling or air to compromise his breathing.
They probably failed to give a reliable history to the vet. They’re so self-absorbed and abusive and clueless, they would not be reliable transmitters of any information to a medical professional. They would never admit to being abusive or rough with the fragile 6 pound dog to the vet and under no circumstances would the gruesome twosome ever be truthful about pulling the dog’s tight neck collar. They told the vet that the dog had been eating his regular food and nothing had happened to the dog and it suddenly started swelling up. The gruesome twosome have been so arrogant that they feel they can treat the dog in any manner that they want and it is acceptable.
If they gave the history of the dog suddenly becoming puffy after eating or being outside, it could be consistent with an allergic reaction to food or a bug. The vet probably wanted to administer steroids and keep the dog for observation for a while to see if it was working and monitor the dog’s condition, but the gruesome twosome were too cheap and crappy to do so and chose to leave with several days of steroid tablets.
You notice that Stephanie specifically made sure to state that she thought that the vet will keep the dog overnight for observation, but did not. ( Stephanie always tells on herself when she lies, the vet what is the recommended observation overnight but the gruesome tease and refused and/or told him to bring the dog to an emergency vet clinic immediately. If the swelling increase at all with in the next few hours, but the gruesome twosome likely just went to sleep for several hours). Stephanie is probably pissed because they just arrived at their luxurious vacation rental house and had to turn around and take the dog to a vet). She was likely pissed and wanted to get back to the rental so she could take a bath and rest.
Stephanie is telling partial truths, as usual. She stated that they arrived at the house, and he suddenly started swelling up so fast, why did that happen, was it after they dragged the dog out of the car by its collar or the dog tried to leap away to get out of the car and caused injury to its throat because the lead was tied to its collar? Philip was impatient, and the dog would not use the bathroom quickly enough and yanked on its collar to get him to move quicker and injured the dog ?
She spent some time preparing her speech in the car. They went to emergency vet 45 minutes away ( then she changed it to 30 minutes away ). Look at her lying around 6: 40. She had to get her quickly scripted storyline down for maximum drama, They were “ both on the phone, going “ our dog is dying. The dog is dying.“ I think she blurred the video of the dog in the front seat after the dog died and she had several days to figure out her complete story line ( and try not to be obviously at fault and create ambiguity and confusion around the status of the dog at the time they took the dog to the vet for the first time. ) and edit the video before she released it to viewers.
Suddenly, she didn’t want anyone to be able to accurately determine how swollen the dog’s neck was at the time of the first visit to the vet. Was it because it wasn’t very swollen at that time but became more swollen overnight when they refused to leave the dog at the vet or carelessly/ recklesslessly/ intentionally failed to give the vet a full and accurate history of what happened to the dog prior to the first visit, then took it back to the rental home and its condition worsened markedly overnight and they failed to notice because they were either drinking and or sleeping for long periods of hours, and not sitting by the dog side all night long watching it every minute. Then during the next day, they took the dog back to aa another vet.
She didn’t care about exploiting the peachick when it was dying at the vet. You noticed she didn’t have any of the vets on camera to explain anything. There’s a reason for that. She didn’t care about clearly filming the dying morphine filled dog in a bed next to the swimming pool. As usual, the “ facts” that she relates in her storyline don’t add up.
She says that the dog got worse overnight so they took the dog back to the vet the next day. The gruesome twosome like to sleep until noon. They probably didn’t look at the dog or monitor the dog for many hours while they were sleeping. Remember the dog is annoying with its whining, attention, seeking, growling, etc. The tiny dog became worse so they took the dog back to a vet.
The second vet had the advantage of having a dog presenting with a history of swelling in the throat area, increasing over a period of many hours v. less than 45 minutes, a dog with a now markedly swollen neck and face, and also had the advantage of knowing that steroid injections did not decrease the swelling in the long run, and in fact, the swelling has worsened, in spite of steroids. This is a different factual pattern and physical presentation then the first vet had when examining the dog.
Remember that vets had to rely on the self absorbed, self-serving pieces of tit gruesome twosome’s history of what happened to the dog and again, they would never admit to any action that might cause physical harm to the dog that could be attributable to either of them. There is a reason why neither of those two should ever own or care for any animal ever again.
She had to blame the first vet of malpractice to make herself look innocent. ( shades of allegations of medical malpractice, levied by Isabel and Stephanie against Oercy’s UK physicians). She also claimed that she only got three hours sleep that night because she doesn’t want to be blamed for not monitoring the dog properly and allowing his condition to progress to a situation, and deteriorate to the point where it needed emergency care, and its condition had become so compromised that it was unlikely for it to survive. There is a reason why she put on the same dress. She knows how to stage the scene to extract maximum pity.
CT imaging has proven to be most effective in diagnosing tracheobronchial injury( windpipe). An X-ray is not the most effective way to discern detailed images to assess any damage to areas like the windpipe , e.g., crush injuries, punctures, etc. The X-ray only gives an generalized overall but not detailed view of the lungs and trachea. Stephanie is only relying upon the generalized information given by the x-ray. The X-ray does not rule out a puncture wound or opening created by a crush injury. Of course, based on the history presented by the gruesome twosome, the doctor would likely only think it could be a small puncture wound. It could’ve been a larger injury that would not heal up within hours and would’ve needed to be surgically addressed, but the vet was never given in history that would make him push forward and do an immediate CT scan that could have indicated a need for immediate surgical intervention rather than talking to wait until the next day to schedule the scan, and the dog died a couple of hours after it was admitted to the clinic.
If the dog received some type of blunt trauma to the throat, e.g., being yanked by his collar or roughly choked or manhandled or jerked around, the Prague ratter dog has a fragile skeleton ( bones and cartilage) . Yanking the 5 to 6 pound dog by its neck collar could have crushed the windpipe in some manner or caused a puncture or rupture in the windpipe, etc. allowing air to slowly and progressively escape under the skin when the dog was breathing. In hindsight, it makes sense that the dog worsened, overnight, because he was breathing for more hours, and more air was being forced likely out of his trachea, and under his skin subcutaneously, so the swelling beneath the skin worsened, and the dogs condition worsened.
They had a syringe of 600 mL of air from under the dog’s skin. I don’t believe that the vet told Stephanie and Philip to take the dog back to the rental house because the dog was emotionally distressed. ( again, Stephanie has to tell on herself). The dog was so hopped up on morphine, but it was lethargic and sleepy. It was not distressed and emotionally distraught. Stephanie mentioned that they didn’t have to bring the dog back to the vet the following day if the dog didn’t puff up again. I think the cheap ass, gruesome twosome once again wanted to save some $$$ on vet bills and start their vacation so they took the dog home with him, gambling on the dog, not getting worse. Less than 30 minutes after they arrived to the rental house, the dog started getting markedly worse and they rushed him back to the vet, where the dog died within the next two hours. The tiny dog could not take any more stress/ trauma.
I think Stephanie Phillips been trying to cover their ass with a storylines crafted around the vet visits with the dog and his death, especially since they’ve received hundreds of comments, criticizing the care of the dog over the past eight months and they do not want to jeopardize any of their Patreon income, or YouTube income, by being revealed to be negligent and reckless dog owners. Take a look at the video below and also check out the times posted. The gruesome twosome repeatedly Talk about how they got no sleep for tonight and how they were looking and monitoring the dog every second that they have the dog with them. They continually kept talking about how each one of them in the other one we’re so exhausted because they were so worried about the dog and never went to sleep, except for an hour or two at a time.
Click to see her explanation.
Also look at 10: 24 we’re Stephanie claims that she did not sleep at all because she’s monitoring the dogs condition all night. Philip prompted her. with the information.Around 11:00, they both talk about how little sleep they have had And give us a speech about how they’ll sleep better with Lancelot between them that night.14:00, Stephanie does her staged no make up, crap hair look, under a blanket by the pool with the dog in the bed…. acting concerned about the dog.
The dog in the video referenced above, had a history of being in a fight with another dog a week prior and had several days + of air trapped subcutaneously under the skin. The first vet was given a different factual situation.
Last edited:
Gertrude Maud
VIP Member
Remember when that bastard dragged a reluctant Lancelot outside by his leash saying, he has to learn.
Ladeda1957
Chatty Member
Loving the icebreaker but I’m not sure this person deserves it, just here to tit stir I think.
NotAChatelaine
VIP Member
She couldn't mention the death of her chickens for months but has no problem throwing out an entire vlog about Ratso's passing?! Vile CREATURE!
The YT world of views and engagement is cynical, manipulative and shallow.
Fleur du mal
Chatty Member
Most of us pet owners have had emergencies of some kind. I found my bulldog once with a swollen head like a pumpkin- I was instructed to administer a spoonful of honey, give an antihistamine, and get the dog in ASAP. The swelling went down on the way to the vet. The dog was examined and also went back for a follow-up. Don't give me that tit, Fanny! Your story stinks!
graciemckitten
VIP Member
I don’t know if the dog actually became worse within 30 minutes after they brought the dog back to the rental house after they saw the second vet or whether Stephanie was fudging the time. it could not have been less than 30 minutes. Stephanie had time to hang out with Philip in the kitchen and watch him make burgers and then change and go lie by the pool with the dog wrapped in a towel and shoot portions of a video, and then had time to change into a dress and take the dog back to the vet, all within 30 minutes of initially arriving back at the rental house? Somethings fishy about that. I don’t believe she’s being truthful once again. Who knows how many hours they kept the worsening dog at the rental house before they finally took the dog back to the vet clinic, where it died allegedly two hours later.
---
I just checked FRK’s Instagram account. She is wiped all the videos off of her Instagram account, and all photos except one of Ratso. She now has no photos of Ruby on her account. I think she may have renamed her self again as an aspiring chef/florist?
I wonder if Stephanie made her delete all photos and videos of Ratso and Ruby off of her Instagram, or whether she decided to do so by herself?
I believe she may have renamed herself again as a chef/florist?
Last edited:
brassy
Well-known member
I believe Snorts yanked the lead so hard it was the final blow…remember the video literally dragging him across the floor with his lead and the uproar regarding the damage it would cause his tiny throat…Lancelot always restrained in his arms…used as an accessory… a prisoner in his arms or a bag….. Snorts could not hide his jealousy when Marie and Fanny were greeted with an over excited Lancelot…but never to him..,the constant grappling and over stimulation morning noon and night by every guest must have also taken its toll… the tiny dog was absolutely exhausted…Fanny as dark as it gets filming your dying dog or was he already dead in the basket..
graciemckitten
VIP Member
The death video now has 176,000 views and 6,261 comments( all feeling sorry for the little orphan princess and loser phillip).
Stephanie knew this was going to be a huge video and that is why she spent several days trying to script portions of the video around some of the “facts “regarding the death of the dog.
Did you notice that Stephanie was wearing the old striped shirt that she wears as a dress that she purchased at an Emmaus 3 to 4 years ago? She has suddenly put away her $2000 gowns And is pretending to be thrifty.
Stephanie knew this was going to be a huge video and that is why she spent several days trying to script portions of the video around some of the “facts “regarding the death of the dog.
Did you notice that Stephanie was wearing the old striped shirt that she wears as a dress that she purchased at an Emmaus 3 to 4 years ago? She has suddenly put away her $2000 gowns And is pretending to be thrifty.
Last edited:
- Status