Teen Mom young & pregnant #41

1 Sort by date Sort by reaction score 2
Miss.Chanandler.Bong said:
I’m sure you didn’t mean anything by it but in my experience some adoptees find it very offensive for people to say “real parents” when you actually mean birth parents
Click to expand...
I get that but science is science they are the adoptive parents not biological they didn’t create that child. So where I see it not the best terminology they aren’t scientifically speaking “the real parents”. Which is why I try refer to them as biological/ non biological/ adoptive/step parent But that is how science works. Because it does take a lot to be a parent involved or not they’re the ones who made you are technically your parents it’s just weather they step up to the plate or not and then you have the ones who aren’t biologically your parent but play that role
 
chaniikinns said:
I get that but science is science they are the adoptive parents not biological they didn’t create that child. So where I see it not the best terminology they aren’t scientifically speaking “the real parents”. Which is why I try refer to them as biological/ non biological/ adoptive/step parent But that is how science works. Because it does take a lot to be a parent involved or not they’re the ones who made you are technically your parents it’s just weather they step up to the plate or not and then you have the ones who aren’t biologically your parent but play that role
Click to expand...
I don't think any of us need a biology lesson, we all understand how it works. Your choice of terminology is pretty offensive though. Many things make a family or a parent and just because someone doesn't adhere to your view of conventional doesn't make them any less of a family or a parent. Schools use parent or carer as they understand families come in many guises and wouldn't wish to upset children or their "parents". Can you imagine saying to an adopted child or a child from a same sex marriage "that's not your real parent/mummy" it's disgusting.

What about surrogacy? The woman carries a fetus that doesn't biologically match her dna, but her body grew that child from an embryo and legally when it is born it is the surrogate mother's child until the legal process is complete. See everything isn't always black and white. Morgan is an absolute shitbag.
Do I think she deserves those children? No.
Do I think she is a great parent? No.
Do I think the kids should live with her? No
Do I think she IS still their parent? Absolutely yes (unfortunately).
---
Also just done some snooping on both their Instas. Looks like Morgan is still in the same house, Laura isn't, going off their pics and videos.

I have a theory that Morgan pissed Laura off so much she's walked out. When she has returned Morgan has refused to let her back in or give the kids over. They live HERE, YOU walked out on us type thing. Laura has had to go to her mums to stay and Morgan has ran down to the court claiming she's abandoned them and got a child arrangement order in place to keep them in the home? Sound plausible?
 
Last edited:
Fificoolkid said:
It's tight. Hopefully Laura will take her to court. But Morgan being the narcissistic person she is will portray Laura in a bad light in court. Narcissits always know how to fool people. I'd be fuming if I birthed 2 babies and had them taken away from me. I hope Laura has the strength to fight.
Click to expand...
To be fair, she fooled no one on the show. It was and still is, clear to all what she is. I really hope Lauren takes her kids back.
 
If I’m remembering correctly Morgan gave up working to stay at home with the children, if this is still the case surely there is also a question of how Morgan can financially care for the children?
 
You guys are talking as if Morgan was illegally slap dashed onto the birth certificate. It’s not that simple I promise 😂😂

I presume a parental order was granted for it to happen, which would 100% make Morgan legally parent two. OR they’ve argued that the husband of a married woman automatically goes on the birth certificate regardless of paternity so why wouldn’t the wife of a married wOman.
 
chaniikinns said:
I get that but science is science they are the adoptive parents not biological they didn’t create that child. So where I see it not the best terminology they aren’t scientifically speaking “the real parents”. Which is why I try refer to them as biological/ non biological/ adoptive/step parent But that is how science works. Because it does take a lot to be a parent involved or not they’re the ones who made you are technically your parents it’s just weather they step up to the plate or not and then you have the ones who aren’t biologically your parent but play that role
Click to expand...
Miss.Chanandler.Bong said:
I’m sure you didn’t mean anything by it but in my experience some adoptees find it very offensive for people to say “real parents” when you actually mean birth parents
Click to expand...

I think many adoptees like myself find it offensive when they are even brought up. I for one don’t need reminding my mum isnt biologically related to me. Personally I think it’s insensitive and rude to even speak about it
 

Attachments

  • IMG_1467.png
    IMG_1467.png
    63 KB · Views: 18
  • IMG_1466.png
    IMG_1466.png
    87.8 KB · Views: 36
  • IMG_1465.png
    IMG_1465.png
    71.9 KB · Views: 37
tftrc said:
She’s smashing the sun beds again lol
Click to expand...
Apart from those ridiculous sweeping brush lashes she insists on wearing, I actually think she looks better there than she has for ages. Her lips don't look quite so fucked. And her hair looks great she needs to realise the natural look suits her way better, she's quite pretty without all that daft crap, makes her look like a clown.
 
Here2BNosey said:
Apart from those ridiculous sweeping brush lashes she insists on wearing, I actually think she looks better there than she has for ages. Her lips don't look quite so fucked. And her hair looks great she needs to realise the natural look suits her way better, she's quite pretty without all that daft crap, makes her look like a clown.
Click to expand...
Yeah deffo. And the lashes really make her eyes droopy don’t get why she doesn’t just have classics
 
Came here from the teen mom UK thread after wanting to find out about Morgan and Laura and why Laura didn’t have her kids, caught up on the threads and I think it’s madness that Morgan is able to keep Laura’s kids from her when Morgan has no biological relation to the kids whatsoever.. I do believe she should still be able to see the children as that’s their mother too (Morgan) but I don’t think she should have a final say over the biological parent I think that is bizarre. I do think this will be temporary tho my friend had a custody battle with her child’s father and he took the children one day from school and she had to wait on court for 9 months before she got them back, she approached the dads door to collect them and he phoned the police to say she was causing the children to become upset by shouting etc which wasn’t true but he was a real narc he knew what to say and they told him he was to keep the children until the court and the mother would be arrested if she was to approach the door again as it was upsetting the kids and his name was on birth certificate it was a court matter not police. At court the judge ripped him a new hole saying what he done was calculated and he used his rights to rip the children from their mother etc. she was given full custody and he got 2 days a week visitation. I think the same will happen with Morgan she’ll keep them until court then she’ll be accused of parental alienation and using the children as weapons, court also take DNA into account unfortunately and although she is mother on paper Morgan unfortunately she is not thru DNA I think unfortunately for her she’ll get exposed for what she is and the kids will be returned to Laura with visitation access granted to Morgan which I think should be the arrangement only reason they’d be put into Morgan’s custody is if Laura was unfit
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top