Tanya Burr #18 Run out of money so back to where it started. The only thing she was remotely good at.

1
Wow, she really is dumb! She pulls out a ‘Wired’ magazine and says she can’t remember when it’s from . She looks at the date and says ‘February 13th - it doesn’t say which year’ …..it’s February 2013 you absolute melt! 🤔🙄🤪
---
….and the way she’s trying to push the gold vermeil jewellery is hilarious- going on about the company recycling jewellery- as though landfill is full of 18 carat chains and rings! 🙄
---
Funny that she’s returned to YouTube when she’s got a new house to renovate……got to grab those freebies I suppose!
 
Last edited:
evoway13 said:
Wow, she really is dumb! She pulls out a ‘Wired’ magazine and says she can’t remember when it’s from . She looks at the date and says ‘February 13th - it doesn’t say which year’ …..it’s February 2013 you absolute melt! 🤔🙄🤪
---
….and the way she’s trying to push the gold vermeil jewellery is hilarious- going on about the company recycling jewellery- as though landfill is full of 18 carat chains and rings! 🙄
---
Funny that she’s returned to YouTube when she’s got a new house to renovate……got to grab those freebies I suppose!
Click to expand...
That’s a very good point isn’t it - it’s not that she wants to provide the public service of long form videos for her fans, she wants a free kitchen so has lowered herself to the platform she didn’t care about (remember that interview when she was trying to get into acting where she said she didn’t watch YouTube tho).

Can’t wait to see who she copies with the house reno - I actually really liked the decor in her living room and kitchen of her current home and it was more classic to me but i can see her going for the Anna edit Scandi cafe kitchen to keep up with the Joneses
 
Last edited:
cashedupbogan said:
Hadn't watched her in years, was she living in the same house she was in with Jim or was she living in a place she bought with her current partner?
What area has she been living in?
Click to expand...
Right by Eel Brook Common in Fulham
---
Shutterbug99 said:
She said she's moving to her dream area in London. Where do we think?

This is the first vlog of hers I've watched since her first vlog back and it's so boring. Lots of her reading from a diary she had as a 5 year old.
Click to expand...
She is so thick, in one breath she says she won't say the area she's moving to for privacy reasons. The next sentence she's all but told us it's North London (ie Hampstead/Belsize Park, as let's face it, those are the only really nice parts) as it takes them too long to get to Norfolk from West London. She is as thick as two short planks.
 
Last edited:
I feel like I’m in the minority here but I’ve been quite enjoying Tanya’s you tube return, it’s nostalgic (and not in a Zoella kind of way!) im really glad she doesn’t show Sage, I have no idea what he looks like and I don’t want to because he’s a little kid and we’ve no business knowing anything about him. I know what Jim’s kids look like and pretty much everything about them, the same with Zoe and Alfie’s kids. I wouldn’t know Sage if I tripped over him and that’s how it should be. We can go after Tarn for a lot of things but her keeping her kid safe from god knows what on the internet is my favourite thing about her.
 
ariannabrandolini said:
Right by Eel Brook Common in Fulham
---

She is so thick, in one breath she says she won't say the area she's moving to for privacy reasons. The next sentence she's all but told us it's North London (ie Hampstead/Belsize Park, as let's face it, those are the only really nice parts) as it takes them too long to get to Norfolk from West London. She is as thick as two short planks.
Click to expand...
I’m pretty sure it’s Hampstead as well.
 
The influencer bar is truly in hell when they're praised for not turning their children into cash cows. It's bare minimum.

Tanya's return to YT has only served to remind me of how truly unintelligent and undeserving of her success she is. She's lazy, her content is boring, serves no purpose, she just wants to freeload off some companies. I hope only really bad companies fall for her ploy. She also has super bad taste so that house is going to be some garish, super expensive nightmare and all her neighbors will probably judge them.
 
QueenBW said:
The influencer bar is truly in hell when they're praised for not turning their children into cash cows. It's bare minimum.

Tanya's return to YT has only served to remind me of how truly unintelligent and undeserving of her success she is. She's lazy, her content is boring, serves no purpose, she just wants to freeload off some companies. I hope only really bad companies fall for her ploy. She also has super bad taste so that house is going to be some garish, super expensive nightmare and all her neighbors will probably judge them.
Click to expand...
You've pretty much summed up the whole problem with influencers and social media "celebrities". They are utterly pointless, lazy and narcissistic, no one should be making money this way. They set a horrible example to young people who think they can get away with uploading tit to social media instead of getting real jobs and contributing positively to society
 
I never watched her before now so I'm pretty new to her content/channel. I really like the way that she keeps her kid out of the picture, totally and completely. I also respect the way that she talks about him in passing without any agenda. There are other YT (Lilly pebbles) who seem to be pretty hateful of their kids existence but Tanya -whether you like her or not - comes across as a really good mum.
 
I don't follow Tanya much (still too pissed off with her being a snobby ungrateful fecker about YT then crawling back as if butter wouldn't melt) but she doesn't seem to use Bogdan a great deal for free stuff (I think) in that creepy 'so many of you asked about Bogdan's jumper so here is a link'. She probably gets masses of free stuff mind you. Jim and his wife Sarah are bloody awful for doing that. I know far too much about Jim's children that I have no business knowing. His eldest, Margot, in particular seems uncomfortable with it all.
 
formerly_sitkx said:
I feel like not monetizing your child’s existence is the bare minimum of parenting 😐 what Tanya is doing with Sage should be considered the absolute norm
Click to expand...
I agree but I think the point is it’s not the norm in her world , which is the frame of reference and basis for comparison. Also she seems to really enjoy being a mum and doesn’t speak negatively about him or being tired etc. Again I’m not saying this as a reason to give her excessive praise, just that it sets her apart somewhat others in the same space, as opposed to elevating her above other ‘regular’ (i.e. not influencer) mothers.
 
It seems like the divorce from Jim taught her a lot about privacy and boundaries. I respect her for keeping her child and relationship private but then again, she wouldn’t have had half of the success or viewers she did if she hadn’t pimped out her life for all to see in the first place. Ironically it’s probably paid for that new forever home. It’s a vicious circle for influencers. I don’t envy them.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top