Russ in Cheshire #2 Give it some cringe

1
L3moning said:
I think he's wrong anyway, the Tories will have 150-200 seats after the election.
Click to expand...
Tbh my heart is hoping for fewer, but my head knows that’s a really bad idea. I do think he’s wrong though and that the tories won’t do as badly as he expects. They still have lots of support in some communities/sectors of society.

Fwiw, I don’t think Labour are the answer to our woes either. It’s going to take a long time for all this *waves vaguely* to get sorted, and it won’t happen quick enough for many.
 
Forallthoseasking said:
He is massively underestimating how well the Tories will do unfortunately.

Which is odd considering I live in the same constituency as him and our MP does less than bare minimum but still has a whopping majority each time. Surely he should understand that people will vote for a donkey if it's got the right colour rosette on it?
Click to expand...
It's essentially wishful thinking.
 
Forallthoseasking said:
He is massively underestimating how well the Tories will do unfortunately.

Which is odd considering I live in the same constituency as him and our MP does less than bare minimum but still has a whopping majority each time. Surely he should understand that people will vote for a donkey if it's got the right colour rosette on it?
Click to expand...
I think you're crediting him with too much critical thinking. Personally, I think he's got some weird form of Stockholm syndrome and now the Tories are about to leave power, he's decided they aren't so bad after all. I bet he loves Sunak - they could talk IT over a pint! He could get some useful investment advice (don't rent a Tesla).
 
skronkywildcat said:
I think the problem with all MPs these days is that they are bleeping thick. In the old days, even if I disagreed with their worldview the majority of them weren’t pure evil or in it for the fame/lols as so many seem to be now. There are so many dimwits they couldn’t run a carpet warehouse in Dorking.
Click to expand...
There have always been dimwits as MPs, its just in years past they didn't have 24/7 access to twitter to let everyone know they're dimwits.
 
Not sure if anyone has read it but the New Yorker have written an article basically suggesting that Lucy Letby is innocent. It has been geoblocked in the UK as next month she faces a retrial for one of the babies where the jury is hung, however for some reason Russ has decided to share it with his massive following.
That’s not the only problem though, it’s a terrible piece of journalism as it platforms two well known derranged grifters. The first is Richard Gill who is a retired academic, he thinks that Bev Allitt could be innocent and that Shipman killed his victims out of kindness. He has been involved in other MOJ including the case of Lucia de Berk, but he’s truly deranged as he threatened to shoot up Manchester crown court during Letbys trial and got a serious warning from the police telling him to stop talking tit online or he’d be held in contempt of court. The second is Sarrita Adams, a woman who lied about having a PhD & being a scientist. She did feature on a couple of academic papers 12 years ago, but has not worked as a scientist since as she has spent the last 10 years in a series of legal battles which have lead her to rack up a significant amount of debt (she lives in the US so all of these legal docs are online). She set up a website and solicited donations from the public on the basis that they would fund an “intervention” where they would take over from the current defense and help Letby with her appeal (despite the fact that Letby and her family repeatedly rejected her offers of help). Obviously this never happened and no one knows what happened to the money she raised.

So yeah, well done to Russ for sharing one of the most irresponsible pieces of journalism I’ve ever seen.
I just feel sorry for the families of the victims.

DEDCBCD0-4DAF-4D56-807A-698AAC2A6579.jpeg
 
Deeznutslol said:
Not sure if anyone has read it but the New Yorker have written an article basically suggesting that Lucy Letby is innocent. It has been geoblocked in the UK as next month she faces a retrial for one of the babies where the jury is hung, however for some reason Russ has decided to share it with his massive following.
That’s not the only problem though, it’s a terrible piece of journalism as it platforms two well known derranged grifters. The first is Richard Gill who is a retired academic, he thinks that Bev Allitt could be innocent and that Shipman killed his victims out of kindness. He has been involved in other MOJ including the case of Lucia de Berk, but he’s truly deranged as he threatened to shoot up Manchester crown court during Letbys trial and got a serious warning from the police telling him to stop talking tit online or he’d be held in contempt of court. The second is Sarrita Adams, a woman who lied about having a PhD & being a scientist. She did feature on a couple of academic papers 12 years ago, but has not worked as a scientist since as she has spent the last 10 years in a series of legal battles which have lead her to rack up a significant amount of debt (she lives in the US so all of these legal docs are online). She set up a website and solicited donations from the public on the basis that they would fund an “intervention” where they would take over from the current defense and help Letby with her appeal (despite the fact that Letby and her family repeatedly rejected her offers of help). Obviously this never happened and no one knows what happened to the money she raised.

So yeah, well done to Russ for sharing one of the most irresponsible pieces of journalism I’ve ever seen.
I just feel sorry for the families of the victims.

View attachment 2948506 q
Click to expand...

'I don't know whether this is true and I can't be bothered to find out but i'm really thirsty for some engagement'

He's such a prick.
 
Deeznutslol said:
Not sure if anyone has read it but the New Yorker have written an article basically suggesting that Lucy Letby is innocent. It has been geoblocked in the UK as next month she faces a retrial for one of the babies where the jury is hung, however for some reason Russ has decided to share it with his massive following.
That’s not the only problem though, it’s a terrible piece of journalism as it platforms two well known derranged grifters. The first is Richard Gill who is a retired academic, he thinks that Bev Allitt could be innocent and that Shipman killed his victims out of kindness. He has been involved in other MOJ including the case of Lucia de Berk, but he’s truly deranged as he threatened to shoot up Manchester crown court during Letbys trial and got a serious warning from the police telling him to stop talking tit online or he’d be held in contempt of court. The second is Sarrita Adams, a woman who lied about having a PhD & being a scientist. She did feature on a couple of academic papers 12 years ago, but has not worked as a scientist since as she has spent the last 10 years in a series of legal battles which have lead her to rack up a significant amount of debt (she lives in the US so all of these legal docs are online). She set up a website and solicited donations from the public on the basis that they would fund an “intervention” where they would take over from the current defense and help Letby with her appeal (despite the fact that Letby and her family repeatedly rejected her offers of help). Obviously this never happened and no one knows what happened to the money she raised.

So yeah, well done to Russ for sharing one of the most irresponsible pieces of journalism I’ve ever seen.
I just feel sorry for the families of the victims.

View attachment 2948506 q
Click to expand...

What a vile man - if he’s no axe to grind and no experience of what it’s like not only being a parent, let alone a bereaved parent, then maybe sit this one out?!!!
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top