Roadside Mum #9 Is this normal behaviour for RSM?

1
Foxvint said:
Depher. Roadside Mum. 2 in the bag. Lots more to go but these are 2 big scalps. Hopefully more ppl on twitter will use critical thinking and remember online accounts only show persona, not person.
Click to expand...
Not a massive scalp but certainly a moderately successful one (as well as being a dim witted and dreadful human) but Reann looks like her kid finding here and the school upbraiding her about it has put paid to THAT particularly exploitative beg.
 
FlashBoof said:
Not a massive scalp but certainly a moderately successful one (as well as being a dim witted and dreadful human) but Reann looks like her kid finding here and the school upbraiding her about it has put paid to THAT particularly exploitative beg.
Click to expand...

Who is Reann? I’ve missed this grifter.


Shimmering said:
This absolutely tracks. I remember someone on here (apologies can't remember who) calling out her very suspicious use of terminally online phrases like being your "favourite shitposter" as absolute red flags for being a big fake lying Internet grifter.
Click to expand...

It makes a lot of sense along with her having the sense to stay mostly anonymous with plausible cover story people won’t question. Having done it before and been burnt would mean she’d want to hide herself better.
 
HotesTilaire said:
Oh so this Reann is a Grifty arse and Reann’s kid read here, told the school and RSM tit herself?
Click to expand...
So many grifty scumbags it’s hard to keep track. Reanns daughter (I believe but as said, she has birthed at least 10 kids to common knowledge) was reading Tattle - the school told Rheann to tone down her appalling output, she gobbled off about it for a few hours then deleted her account! So RSM adjacent at best rather than wholly connected.
 
CabalofBolorneaise said:
Who is Reann? I’ve missed this grifter.




It makes a lot of sense along with her having the sense to stay mostly anonymous with plausible cover story people won’t question. Having done it before and been burnt would mean she’d want to hide herself better.
Click to expand...

Yesssss. Everything was thought through. Someone else on here looked up her blog and she'd ensured it was anonymously registered and untraceable. I'm not techy at all so don't know the details, but apparently this was a very unusual move.
 
Shimmering said:
Yesssss. Everything was thought through. Someone else on here looked up her blog and she'd ensured it was anonymously registered and untraceable. I'm not techy at all so don't know the details, but apparently this was a very unusual move.
Click to expand...

I own my own domain. As a matter of common sense, I use a domain privacy service because otherwise my full name and home address would be publicly available via the whois registry. Costs something nominal like £10 a year.

I may be thinking "that's not unusual because I do it," here but having an anonymous website isn't anything unusual IMHO.
 
Witchfinder Sargeant said:
I own my own domain. As a matter of common sense, I use a domain privacy service because otherwise my full name and home address would be publicly available via the whois registry. Costs something nominal like £10 a year.

I may be thinking "that's not unusual because I do it," here but having an anonymous website isn't anything unusual IMHO.
Click to expand...

Yeah I think this is pretty standard. A lot of the most common domain purchasing sites offer it as an add on when buying too - the Whois info will be often GoDaddy or whatever.

More unusual these days for people to have their info publicly available I reckon.
 
Shimmering said:
No, Unbound are still selling it. They have it listed as "being funded". I've lost track of how late it is.
Click to expand...

All while she appears to have fully deleted her account and gone incommunicado. Which unbound know because whichever legend took over her account handle has tagged them asking about refunds in the past.

I thought having her following was a part of her contract but they don’t seem to care.
 
CabalofBolorneaise said:
I thought having her following was a part of her contract but they don’t seem to care.
Click to expand...

I thought the same. Come on funders, surely you must have googled her by now and found this thread, demand your refunds.

Unless, of course, as I suspect, most of them are well off stereotypical JM Tanskii types who have bought it for virtue signalling purposes
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top