Means she's back beefing with Rumplestiltskin and blaming the kids by the look of it.What's she on about here? I've never known any couples like this
View attachment 3273078 q
Any once again - retweeting news headlines and GFMs is NOT campaigning
Is it? Fuckin hell!It takes a very special sort of person to retweet a fly high he's with the angles now tribute that features the bold and unorthodox creative choice of using the actual prison muggie of the deceased doesn't it.
What's she on about here? I've never known any couples like this
View attachment 3273078 q
Any once again - retweeting news headlines and GFMs is NOT campaigning
What's she on about here? I've never known any couples like this
View attachment 3273078 q
Any once again - retweeting news headlines and GFMs is NOT campaigning
A lot of children I'm sure play one parent off against the other (mine did sometimes).This speaks volumes about their family, who is priotised in that household (not the children) and her relationship.
Blaming children for issues in adult relationships is wrong on so many levels.
I'm sure someone else can articulate this better than I can, but I can't think of a scenario where children being triangulated into conflict in adult relationships and blamed for relationship breakdowns reflects well on the parents? At best it's tit parenting and at worst, abusive.
I hope this isn't about her kids.What's she on about here? I've never known any couples like this
View attachment 3273078 q
Any once again - retweeting news headlines and GFMs is NOT campaigning
Excellent post. Same as lots of disabled people don't like the paralympics. They want to be seen as fully human, not super human. Most disabled people aren't performing impressive physical feats, they're fighting to make their immediate environments less challenging to negotiate.I hope this isn't about her kids.
The CIN posts are weird. A lot of the disabled community don't like it but her reason seem to be because she doesn't benefit from it. The main reason people don't like CIN is because it's exploitative. Services shouldn't rely on public donations and disabled children shouldn't have to lose their privacy and dignity to get support. People donate to feel good about themselves and for that to happen children have to perform a santised version of disability where they're always grateful, cute and smiley. That further stigmatises children who dont meet some cutesy ideal. Sure she's not doing this on such a big scale but that is what she's doing with her platform. There maybe times it's unavoidable to campaign for your child without including their story or where private fundraising is the only answer but if it's not necessary (like anonspecific gofundme) why would you risk their privacy?
A lot of children I'm sure play one parent off against the other (mine did sometimes).
As you say it's up to the parents, who are adults to recognise what is going on. And not over react.
Trust Reanne's default setting to be to completely over dramatise a not unusual family dynamic and make herself the victim.
He's being silenced about as much as a Scots Guadelouperd 1st battalion award winning bagpiper at his own wedding to a bagpiper afficionado who can only cum from the sound of the bagpipes.