Be More Pacific
VIP Member
It always confuses me when people get their sentences reduced for ‘good behaviour’. They’ve already committed the ‘bad behaviour’ that’s why they’re in bleeping prison in the first place. Making exceptional progress won’t bring their victim back. It’s stupid.
I don't think we really have time off for good behaviour here - that's very much an American thing and, as such, a common misconception that we're the same.
Anyway, I found this case review which details what happened:
So, basically, if I'm reading this correctly, it's because he was sentenced as a youth (under eighteen at the time of the offence) and this allows such a review to take place.