MissGlitzyRitzy
VIP Member
I think it is entirely the wrong format of a programme. Makes me sick poor Philli on an Island moping and reflecting cashing in with the sympathy vote. A victim of his grooming has been silenced and he has to watch PS worm his way back without the victims fair side of the story coming out.I think he's saying it's his last time, but in his delusional mind he's hoping this programme will make people love him again and that they'll think "God yeah, he's right, and has been treated terribly". And thus, he hopes more offers will pour in. BUT if it's terribly received, which it probably will be, and people say "We don't want him back on our screens" (which of course they're already saying) then he can say "Well I said this was my last time on TV anyway. I don't want to come back". So in his eyes everything is on his terms as usual.
We know for any victim to be silenced is hell but to watch the perpetrator try gain the sympathy and yet we don't know what happened.
We can't really have a person have a comeback gaining sympathy when he was sacked in regards to grooming a young lad. He was sacked after a long time of public pressure.
I do not think he should be allowed a comeback on TV until this young lad (any others) gets to say their side of the story. Just what are we letting back on our screens?
That must feel terrible for a victim to see the whole tv career back on track when theres was very tarnished.
I cat be watching such a person and no one should be tuning in to his show.
Suddenly Huw Edwards details came out later, then of course PS brother. Hmmm?
who knows what's more to come from PS if he silenced a victim (was it just one Silenced?) he did it for good reason and also just what details did PS not want to come out? Surely if it matched his narrative he wouldn't have a problem.
Was it simply a work fling with 2 people attracted to eachother? It seems pretty tame if so and not a reason to silence the victim.
but of course the runners side is likely very different to use an NDA or whatever
---
Fern and Philwere gold but I think he wanted a younger more impressionable newbie with Holly as Fern stood her ground as she was experienced. They were a great pair as were Rich and JudyThis Morning was never the same after Richard & Judy left, but Fern was an amazing interviewer and Phil gained from having her as a partner. Yet Fern was paid less than him. Phil also told Fern to not talk to him in a certain way and he drove her away. Yet he thought he was the big star and didn't realise he later looked creepy making out he was best friends with a young docile woman who he insisted get the job. I think it was time Phil & Holly left anyway as they were boring with no chemistry. I never understood why they were on the show for so long.
I don't really know what Josie Gibson did before TM, but she has so much more personality than Holly and seems genuine when interviewing people.
I love Josie a total natural and I'm unsure why her and Criag are not presenting together even Ben too.
Craig and Josie were gold and I'm sure Ben would work well with Josie but Cat and Ben looks fake as Cat overcompensate with Ben as she wants them to look natural together.
I don't mind themseperate but not together.