Affiliatemebaby
VIP Member
I seem to remember that the criticism of the original judge’s sentence was that culpable homicide (manslaughter equivalent) applies to unintentional murder. The judgment on the other hand found that Pistorius would have known that shooting in the way he did was sure to kill whoever was behind the door (Reeva or an intruder) and that therefore the conviction should have been for unpremeditated murder, the lesser murder charge but still subject to a much greater sentence than manslaughter: this was the conviction on appeal.