Lynsey Queen of Clean #5 She’s NOT a Celebrity, Get Her Out of Here!

Status
Thread locked. We start a new thread when they have over 1000 posts, click the blue button to see all threads for this topic and find the latest open thread.
1
Noseymeddler said:
That pink is something a five year old would pick it’s revolting there’s some gorgeous pale pinks that’d of looked far nice. Then there’s the shitter unicorn glitter in the downstairs toilet she’s got weird interior design ideas that are off the scale hilarious.
Click to expand...

she has ZERO interiors style - it might be right up someone’s street but it’s all so cheap and tacky looking
 
Ha. Good try half job lyns But you’re not fortnum and masons demographic
 

Attachments

  • 35F4C5E3-3128-4B4D-BC87-0A8AF2D0260C.png
    35F4C5E3-3128-4B4D-BC87-0A8AF2D0260C.png
    89 KB · Views: 81
Why so much crap in the downstairs loo? She’s got cupboards either side of the toilet so just put your towels, toilet roll etc in there. It would look a lot cleaner and tidier if all that was hidden away. Also wtf is that anchor? It doesn’t match the dog print does it.
 
Before I made my account, I was lurking about, but noticed she looked around a new build house in her local area, which she claimed had no “storage” so wasn’t interested in the house. At the time, I researched the house/es she looked around - it was a 15 house estate on the edge of a big known house build estate, and to be fair each house was different in terms of layout but all priced between £750 - 800,00. All of which had a great location, tit garden, but was forgiven because of the view - Quite pricey, yes. But if her only reason for not wanting one was the fact they had “no storage”, is absolute bullshit, because the way she has remodelled her house has given her 50% less storage than one of the New build executive homes would have given her - she obviously could not afford the price tag!!
I typed her name “Lynsey queen of queen” into google, and came across her LTD company (free for anyone to see) - she has her husband and all 3 kids registered to her “queen of clean” company - so she pays all of them dividends, which reduces her tax payments!! Sly, snakey witch she is.
 
Rock n roll said:
I typed her name “Lynsey queen of queen” into google, and came across her LTD company (free for anyone to see) - she has her husband and all 3 kids registered to her “queen of clean” company - so she pays all of them dividends, which reduces her tax payments!! Sly, snakey witch she is.
Click to expand...

A little knowledge is a dangerous thing. When you say 'registered to her company' I think you mean they're shareholders. You cannot state that she pays them all dividends because she hasn't filed any accounts yet, you can instead assume that their type of shareholding means they'll have dividends in due course. And how does having other shareholders mean that her tax payments are reduced? What's sly and snakey about it?
 
atomichabits said:
A little knowledge is a dangerous thing. When you say 'registered to her company' I think you mean they're shareholders. You cannot state that she pays them all dividends because she hasn't filed any accounts yet, you can instead assume that their type of shareholding means they'll have dividends in due course. And how does having other shareholders mean that her tax payments are reduced? What's sly and snakey about it?
Click to expand...
EVERYTHING is sly and snakey about Lynsey. .
 
atomichabits said:
A little knowledge is a dangerous thing. When you say 'registered to her company' I think you mean they're shareholders. You cannot state that she pays them all dividends because she hasn't filed any accounts yet, you can instead assume that their type of shareholding means they'll have dividends in due course. And how does having other shareholders mean that her tax payments are reduced? What's sly and snakey about it?
Click to expand...
I apologise as it’s none of my business in the grand scheme of things.
But in general she is sly and snakey with how she earns her money from the swipe ups etc
 
atomichabits said:
A little knowledge is a dangerous thing. When you say 'registered to her company' I think you mean they're shareholders. You cannot state that she pays them all dividends because she hasn't filed any accounts yet, you can instead assume that their type of shareholding means they'll have dividends in due course. And how does having other shareholders mean that her tax payments are reduced? What's sly and snakey about it?
Click to expand...
I agree with you on this one. I’m sure her accountant will have set this up correctly for her.
 
atomichabits said:
A little knowledge is a dangerous thing. When you say 'registered to her company' I think you mean they're shareholders. You cannot state that she pays them all dividends because she hasn't filed any accounts yet, you can instead assume that their type of shareholding means they'll have dividends in due course. And how does having other shareholders mean that her tax payments are reduced? What's sly and snakey about it?
Click to expand...
Actually this is good accounting and chances are her accountant has advised her to do this. It is perfectly legal and most LTD companies have a similar set up
 
Status
Thread locked. We start a new thread when they have over 1000 posts, click the blue button to see all threads for this topic and find the latest open thread.
Back
Top