Just looking through evidence from yesterday.
7 babies on this document who suddenly deteriorated but survived, but not on the indictment as they are censored as ‘I&S’ so don’t have ciphers.
Compeltely irrelevant but Stephen Cross pointed this out, which everyone agreed to yet the name stayed the same!
View attachment 3280847 q
This next document
https://thirlwall.public-inquiry.uk/wp-content/uploads/thirlwall-evidence/INQ0102306_02-09.pdf
gives me anxiety because this is minutes from a meeting with the exec and Cheshire police (May 2017) and basically police saying they will be guided by COCH and currently no evidence of criminality. it’s so worrying to see how easily she could have got away with this if it wasn’t for the consultant’s persistence.
I need to read more but it seems Dr J emailed police (Nigel Wenham) directly but everyone agreed (COCH and police) he added no new information. But police decided they would meet with him personally to ensure he had nothing else to disclose. I’m wondering if it was that meeting that finally turned it into a police investigation.
here’s some extracts from the exec in that meeting. You can see that they were just hoping the police would confirm ‘nothing to see here’ so they can get the consultants to move on. It’s a long document but worth a read.
View attachment 3280859 qView attachment 3280860 q