Katie Price #162 We’re sick to death of Katie’s yammer, shove the vile toad in the slammer.

Status
Thread locked. We start a new thread when they have over 1000 posts, click the blue button to see all threads for this topic and find the latest open thread.
I think we discussed a while ago that reporting it to Adult Services or god forbid the college is not the way to go. They will be very aware of what is happening.
Sorry I disagree people need to speak out otherwise how do you ever expect life to improve for vulnerable people and children? As for them ‘being aware’ it’s not good enough, look at all the things that have come to light after children have lost their lives to parents, carers etc and how they’ve been let down by the powers that be. There are suppose to be services to protect those vulnerable paid for by us the tax payers, they’re clearly not doing their job properly so I don’t think we should assume it’s being taken seriously.
 
The trouble is though I feel that Harvey has been primed from a very young age to just say 'yes mum' to anything KP says to him. So she would say 'you do want to go to a nightclub with me don't you Harv?' and he would just say 'yes mum', same as he does with any question she asks him. Is that really capacity to make decisions though?
I hear your concern - but KP would not have been with H for his capacity assessment. He would be supported by familiar carers and social worker would ask H questions in a way he would understand and ask him to answer in his own way - eg what does he think nightclub would be like, does he know it is very noisy, what would he do if people shouted to him etc.
H's anwers would indicate if he really understood what a nightclub was like and that he was not being coerced and just parroting what KP wanted him to say.

Adults have the legal right to make unwise decisions too - I can choose to do dangerous sports for example.
In the same way, H can make unwise decisions if he has the mental capacity to understand the risks involved.
 
Last edited:
I hear your concern - but KP would not have been with H for his capacity assessment. He would be supported by familiar carers and social worker would ask H questions in a way he would understand - eg what does he think nightclub would be like, does he know it is very noisy, what would he do if people shouted to him etc.
H's anwers would indicate if he really understood what a nightclub was like and that he was not being coerced and just parroting what KP wanted him to say.

Adults have the legal right to make unwise decisions too - I can choose to do dangerous sports for example.
In the same way, H can make unwise decisions if he has the mental capacity to understand the risks involved.
And would they also have explained the dangers of him catching Covid (especially at an indoor venue where people are no longer wearing masking or doing LF tests) and what that could do to him if not why not? You are talking about him as if he is capable of making decisions about his health when it’s very clear he isn’t. It‘s bad enough to put him in that environment pre Covid but this is a different time altogether, it’s complete madness and totally irresponsible of all those responsible for Harvey that have given it the go ahead. I doubt very much his specialists at the hospital would approve.
 
Harvey‘s face is that of a confused, innocent child and a child is really what he is because of his medical condition. You wouldn’t put a child in that situation unless you're evil and that’s exactly what his mother is!


I’ve watched it and it made me feel beyond uncomfortable. You can tell when he walks in to his booth he is overwhelmed. They sit him in front of a train track whilst the whole crowd shout out to him and take photos. He hasn’t a clue what’s going on. He doesn’t understand that he is being mocked by the crowd. I can’t actually believe this has been allowed to happen. Every single adult involved with this should be ashamed of themselves. That footage is just horrendous.
 
To be honest, I don’t think any kind of public outrage will stop her from doing exactly what she wants.As long as the money keeps rolling in.
I was thinking about the total lack of morality where this is concerned She .just doesn’t care.I noticed a deafening silence from her family as well.
If it makes money, and the law/authorities don’t intervene, then it’s all systems go as far as Price is concerned.
Every last person who organised, supported or attended this farce is lowlife scum.
The fact that Harvey wasn’t traumatised is beside the point.This was an explotation masterclass.Possibly the one masterclass she excels in.
And I find it difficult to believe £6k was all that she got.
 
In a noisy nightclub???

The college would have known where Harvey was going last night. They would have done an assessment with him about where he was going and what it would entail, and if he had some understanding of where he was going. They would let Harvey make the decision, if he wanted to go. Whether he made the right decision is immaterial, you cannot take away his right to choose. We all make mistakes.
 
Noodlenips posted this last night. It looks like Skank posted it at just before 10:00pm. The "event" was supposed to start at 9:30pm. I don't know what time she actually turned up but those people that paid £150 for one-to-one could hardly have had any 'quality' time...! None of the papers have mentioned that she was really late to the party...!

View attachment 1232227 q
Gosh that must have been the queue of chavs trying to get to that crudhole to see her :ROFLMAO::sneaky:;)

Did the club sell and supply the Harvey "what a day" t-shirts then? How much did they charge? Gross🤢
I expect that was her doing - gotta rake in a few shekels when you can

Very average. Nothing special. Horses are probably on full livery.
But she's got them back at the tit pit, they were no doubt chucked out of livery because she's not paid the bills for a year or two
 
She put some videos on tick toc from the meet n greet, was so loud in there..
 

Attachments

  • Screenshot_20220430-133022_TikTok.jpg
    Screenshot_20220430-133022_TikTok.jpg
    43.8 KB · Views: 372
  • Screenshot_20220430-133028_TikTok.jpg
    Screenshot_20220430-133028_TikTok.jpg
    41.9 KB · Views: 371
  • Screenshot_20220430-133025_TikTok.jpg
    Screenshot_20220430-133025_TikTok.jpg
    46 KB · Views: 364
  • Screenshot_20220430-133031_TikTok.jpg
    Screenshot_20220430-133031_TikTok.jpg
    41.9 KB · Views: 360
  • Screenshot_20220430-132612_TikTok.jpg
    Screenshot_20220430-132612_TikTok.jpg
    38 KB · Views: 359
  • Screenshot_20220430-132646_TikTok.jpg
    Screenshot_20220430-132646_TikTok.jpg
    44.8 KB · Views: 358
  • Screenshot_20220430-132618_TikTok.jpg
    Screenshot_20220430-132618_TikTok.jpg
    42.9 KB · Views: 348
The college would have known where Harvey was going last night. They would have done an assessment with him about where he was going and what it would entail, and if he had some understanding of where he was going. They would let Harvey make the decision, if he wanted to go. Whether he made the right decision is immaterial, you cannot take away his right to choose. We all make mistakes.
You really think they said but if you do choose to go you are putting yourself at risk of getting an illness that could make you seriously ill, or even worse lose your life and if they didn’t say that why not because it’s a fact of Harvey going somewhere like that atm. As for saying ‘whether he made the right decision is immaterial’ is shocking, it could cost him his life so it’s far from immaterial. To make an informed decision you have to have all the facts.
 
The college would have known where Harvey was going last night. They would have done an assessment with him about where he was going and what it would entail, and if he had some understanding of where he was going. They would let Harvey make the decision, if he wanted to go. Whether he made the right decision is immaterial, you cannot take away his right to choose. We all make mistakes.
I don' think Harvey really understood what this was all about, his vile mother must have talked him into it, Skanky is just a puppeteer.
 
And would they also have explained the dangers of him catching Covid (especially at an indoor venue where people are no longer wearing masking or doing LF tests) and what that could do to him if not why not? You are talking about him as if he is capable of making decisions about his health when it’s very clear he isn’t. It‘s bad enough to put him in that environment pre Covid but this is a different time altogether, it’s complete madness and totally irresponsible of all those responsible for Harvey that have given it the go ahead. I doubt very much his specialists at the hospital would approve.
As I said in my earlier post I am discussing the processes in place, not my personal opinion.
And current covid guidelines are that masks are not required in indoor settings.

I don't know if H has capacity, legally capacity is assumed until it is shown a person lacks capacity. Do you know if H lacks capacity to decide to go to a nightclub?

I'm just giving insight about current legislation - I don't make the rules 🤷‍♀️....
 
The college would have known where Harvey was going last night. They would have done an assessment with him about where he was going and what it would entail, and if he had some understanding of where he was going. They would let Harvey make the decision, if he wanted to go. Whether he made the right decision is immaterial, you cannot take away his right to choose. We all make mistakes.

Surely the right to choose is based on capacity to choose. Do we know Harvey’s mental age, does he have the capacity to understand the nuance of a situation like a nightclub? He just seems really out of his depth in the photos and I while I agree we all should have the right to make mistakes the impact of those mistakes can be worse for s vulnerable adult. I suppose we just have to trust the college are doing the proper risk assessments although as someone pointed out earlier, his carer having a username with witch in it doesn’t come across as very professional.
 
As I said in my earlier post I am discussing the processes in place, not my personal opinion.
And current covid guidelines are that masks are not required in indoor settings.

I don't if H has capacity, legally capacity is assumed until it is shown a person lacks capacity. Do you know if H lacks capacity to decide to go to a nightclub?

I'm just giving insight about current legislation - I don't make the rules 🤷‍♀️....
Can I ask as you have an insight to the processes in place do they not also take into account Covid and how vulnerable the person would be if they caught it. If the powers that be don’t why on earth not as it’s a danger like any other danger and these vulnerable people aren’t protected at all they are like lambs to the slaughter.
 
Last edited:
And creepy carl staying out of the way ...unless he was knocking one out in the mens toilets ........and does he only have one set of clothes?
those ripped jeans seem to be his going out attire..or are they ripped because hes had them for so long lmfao
I wonder why he is staying out of the way when he's obliged to drive it all over the place? Not seen in Court, hidden away at this crudhole?

One might think he is distancing himself from the explosion that is coming...................................... LOL
 
I wonder why he is staying out of the way when he's obliged to drive it all over the place? Not seen in Court, hidden away at this crudhole?

One might think he is distancing himself from the explosion that is coming...................................... LOL
There is something brewing Rita,must be..wonder if it’s court case coming up..it’s weird nowhere to be seen but is there.🤔
 
Status
Thread locked. We start a new thread when they have over 1000 posts, click the blue button to see all threads for this topic and find the latest open thread.
Back
Top