Or did her children, change plans?They are at an age now where they can decide where that want to be, surely?She did drop hints about all the Christmas plans changing at the last minute to accommodate him, I think?
The gluten free meal was after Christmas I think, when she was back in London. While it is sad if her kids weren’t with her for very long at Christmas, her kids are now older and possibly want to be closer to their own friends and local area than go to a holiday home or an Impersonal London rental away from friends, etc.She has definitely been with the kids, she mentioned the boys at some point and she also mentioned a restaurant she had been to and referenced gluten free food options. I’m assuming that would have been for her daughter.
The gluten free meal was after Christmas I think, when she was back in London. While it is sad if her kids weren’t with her for very long at Christmas, her kids are now older and possibly want to be closer to their own friends and local area than go to a holiday home or an Impersonal London rental away from friends, etc.She has definitely been with the kids, she mentioned the boys at some point and she also mentioned a restaurant she had been to and referenced gluten free food options. I’m assuming that would have been for her daughter.
There's probably a blanket ban on invading the privacy of Mr F or the kids via Instagram as part of the divorce.
Or did her children, change plans?They are at an age now where they can decide where that want to be, surely?
---
The gluten free meal was after Christmas I think, when she was back in London. While it is sad if her kids weren’t with her for very long at Christmas, her kids are now older and possibly want to be closer to their own friends and local area than go to a holiday home or an Impersonal London rental away from friends, etc.
---
The gluten free meal was after Christmas I think, when she was back in London. While it is sad if her kids weren’t with her for very long at Christmas, her kids are now older and possibly want to be closer to their own friends and local area than go to a holiday home or an Impersonal London rental away from friends, etc.
She used to refer to one as "The Aspie" as he has Aspergers. Now I have no experience raising children with Aspergers but I thought it was slightly derogatory or could be taken to be. Anyway - good the kids aren't featured online. I suspect as they are older they have refused to anyway, I know mine would!50:50 agreement is usually just in name only with older kids and just means there’s no childcare financial agreement for either party. The kids are of ages where they can come and go as they please.
Although, that’s easier if you live close by!
I agree she’s not allowed to talk about them at all online. To be honest, if I was Kat, I would be muttering about him being fine about it when he was getting free holidays.
The trouble is, I’m not sure Kat is very good at thinking of future repercussions and so I can see why it’s a blanket ban. It was obviously a bone of contention before they split though.
I also spotted this comment on a post of her from a week ago - she hadn’t answered it.
View attachment 2679067 q
I'd imagine that is exactly it.Really? She must have? I thought she was just keeping quiet about anything to do with them. If she hasn’t though that’s really sad.
Why choose it then? Imagining myself in her position, I would *never* move somewhere my dog couldn't come too!I’m assuming her rented flat doesn’t allow dogs