Juice Plus Past & Present #10 So many huns have gone, but the Kumrous and Aldridges are clinging on

Status
Thread locked. We start a new thread when they have over 1000 posts, click the blue button to see all threads for this topic and find the latest open thread.
1
I_mean_reaaaalllly said:
News report suggests the offences may have been committed in Eau Claire , Wisconsin…. This is where Faith lives.
Click to expand...
Let’s leave names out of it but we can say that Luke lived in Eau Claire Wisconsin and Stillwater Minnesota and was charged in Sarasota. Minn police reached out to Sarasota police so it would appear that it started in Minn. which if it did that’s when Kadee met Luke wen he was renting a house in Minn. just read 2 articles. A Facebook Sarasota page show mugshots and someone already tagged Rebecca in the comments on Lucas Wren.
 
mariamorgan said:
Let’s leave names out of it but we can say that Luke lived in Eau Claire Wisconsin and Stillwater Minnesota and was charged in Sarasota. Minn police reached out to Sarasota police so it would appear that it started in Minn. which if it did that’s when Kadee met Luke wen he was renting a house in Minn. just read 2 articles. A Facebook Sarasota page show mugshots and someone already tagged Rebecca in the comments on Lucas Wren.
Click to expand...
Can you share that post? I found one with people asking for the death penalty for Luke....
 
Boombirdie said:
Can you share that post? I found one with people asking for the death penalty for Luke....
Click to expand...
You have to scroll down to the arrest date Aug 24
 

Attachments

  • IMG_5087.jpeg
    IMG_5087.jpeg
    40.4 KB · Views: 93
I don’t want to be a tell you so, but all those posts of his daughter dancing in bikinis etc just didn’t sit right with me. I mentioned it on here a couple of times and was told it was normal and how happy she looked, but no child should be put on the internet near naked.

I always had a weird feeling about him, but this has shocked me!
 
harveydean said:
I don’t want to be a tell you so, but all those posts of his daughter dancing in bikinis etc just didn’t sit right with me. I mentioned it on here a couple of times and was told it was normal and how happy she looked, but no child should be put on the internet near naked.

I always had a weird feeling about him, but this has shocked me!
Click to expand...
Idk. From dancing in a bikini to raping a girl there are a whole lots of different shades of grey. Lots of people post swimming pool/dancing photos of their kids
 
In all of the drama that surrounds the Raveys/Wrens, I definitely did not expect this at all. Completely shocked!
I agree it’s a bit dangerous to speculate until all of the facts are presented, or anything is proven, but this is certainly quite horrifying.
Just so mindful of all of the innocent lives involved in this, and the horrible impact on them.
 
Boombirdie said:
Idk. From dancing in a bikini to raping a girl there are a whole lots of different shades of grey. Lots of people post swimming pool/dancing photos of their kids
Click to expand...

Lots of people do. Doesn’t make it right though. Not in regard to this case, but I’m sure you’re aware that pedalos take photos from the internet and photoshop them.

No semi naked child should be put on the internet by their parents.
 
No it’s not the opposite. $0.00 on a bail or bond means that it either all tied into one bond/bail charge and it’s been paid either via loan or cash. OR when the defendant doesn’t have to pay any money to be released from custody as it’s not a murder charge, they aren’t considered a flight risk, but they have had to sign a personal recognisance bond whereby they are released on their own recognisance and required to return to court by a set date. Guessing from the article that’s October.

Personal recognisance means that There would have been a set fee that he had to pay for example $300,000 and if he doesn’t appear on that date set for court then he has to pay that amount.

It’s only when they state “NO BAIL” that the crime and evidence is serious enough that they don’t allow the person out of jail and they must stay there until their court date.

It means right now he is out, they possibly don’t have all the evidence, it’s a historic crime which means it takes time to gather evidence, aged and depleted, and a lot of victim testimony if these girls in question are older now.
 
spillalltheteatome said:
No it’s not the opposite. $0.00 on a bail or bond means that it either all tied into one bond/bail charge and it’s been paid either via loan or cash. OR when the defendant doesn’t have to pay any money to be released from custody as it’s not a murder charge, they aren’t considered a flight risk, but they have had to sign a personal recognisance bond whereby they are released on their own recognisance and required to return to court by a set date. Guessing from the article that’s October.

Personal recognisance means that There would have been a set fee that he had to pay for example $300,000 and if he doesn’t appear on that date set for court then he has to pay that amount.

It’s only when they state “NO BAIL” that the crime and evidence is serious enough that they don’t allow the person out of jail and they must stay there until their court date.

It means right now he is out, they possibly don’t have all the evidence, it’s a historic crime which means it takes time to gather evidence, aged and depleted, and a lot of victim testimony if these girls in question are older now.
Click to expand...
So he's home. I'm assuming he wouldn't be allowed to have Lake around, not that Kaddie would allow it of course.
 
Status
Thread locked. We start a new thread when they have over 1000 posts, click the blue button to see all threads for this topic and find the latest open thread.
Back
Top