he is becoming like tanya, no mention of youtube, sorry one poorly sold book does not mean you are a writer above all else
he is becoming like tanya, no mention of youtube, sorry one poorly sold book does not mean you are a writer above all else
First ppl I heard say it was Jonathan and Anna Saccone Joly which says a lot they called Eduardo Mr Delicious all the time and Anna would # IG post with thatIt is so wierd. Delicious?
I literally have never ever heard anyone call a baby delicious before. And hopefully never will again. Very very odd.
Maybe it's because i'm from a place where delicious is only used to describe food or sex so it sounds extra bad to meI think you guys are being a bit over the top lol not a Jim fan whatsoever but but he’s hardly calling her a tasty wee morsel - I’ve heard people use delicious as a term of endearment tons!
delicious is a very common term of endearment in the part of england i'm from for babies. not weird at all.I think you guys are being a bit over the top lol not a Jim fan whatsoever but but he’s hardly calling her a tasty wee morsel - I’ve heard people use delicious as a term of endearment tons!
It’s normally “oh gosh you’re so cute I could just eat you up” really common I remember when my youngest sister was born people even strangers would just say it always especially with baby fat rollsPretty weird to say you'd want to eat a baby
Yeah, I'm a native Spanish and English speaker and in some countries when you say "el delicioso" (the delicious) it's a slang term for, kind of a sleazy way of calling sex. So I'd never call a baby delicious. You can say they smell delicious, I've heard that plenty which I don't get but okay, but they're NOT delicious themselves
OG Spanish made me laughDefinitely not Spain Spanish though is it? I find Latin American Spanish a lot more sleazy than og Spanish.
Definitely not Spain Spanish though is it? I find Latin American Spanish a lot more sleazy than og Spanish.
Maybe because identical twins split from the same egg their kids would in that way have been more connected in Sarah's mind as they would also have technically come from that same egg? I'm just guessing here though lol!I don’t understand this. According to Sarah’s logic, because Jim and his brother are not identical twins, their kids aren’t “more than cousins.”
Huh? Even if Jim and his brother were identical, their kids would still only be cousins. Whether they’re identical or fraternal twins or twins at all is totally irrelevant?
I think with the children of identical twins they would still be cousins but in terms of genetics it would be more like half-siblings.I don’t understand this. According to Sarah’s logic, because Jim and his brother are not identical twins, their kids aren’t “more than cousins.”
Huh? Even if Jim and his brother were identical, their kids would still only be cousins. Whether they’re identical or fraternal twins or twins at all is totally irrelevant?
Maybe because identical twins split from the same egg their kids would in that way have been more connected in Sarah's mind as they would also have technically come from that same egg? I'm just guessing here though lol!
True, children of identical twins would be more genetically similar than those of fraternal twins (who are basically normal siblings that just happen to be born at the same time). But they’d still be considered cousins on a social level because their dads are brothers… not the same person? I’m probably reading too much into this because I myself am a twin hahaI think with the children of identical twins they would still be cousins but in terms of genetics it would be more like half-siblings.