Jim Chapman #5 Show off my baby

Status
Thread locked. We start a new thread when they have over 1000 posts, click the blue button to see all threads for this topic and find the latest open thread.
1
Yeah, I'm a native Spanish and English speaker and in some countries when you say "el delicioso" (the delicious) it's a slang term for, kind of a sleazy way of calling sex. So I'd never call a baby delicious. You can say they smell delicious, I've heard that plenty which I don't get but okay, but they're NOT delicious themselves :p
 
Perhaps we shouldn’t get bogged down by debating whether phrases are weird or not, as context is key. I think it’s fair to say that Jim has a special talent for taking words and lending them an air of creepiness laced with a pinch of attention-seeking desperation, particularly when applied to, say, an acquaintance’s newborn baby. Lordy Lordy!

I must say from the recent stories he looks tired but genuinely happy, and Margot is so cute (or delicious, if you will!!)

I think the less he says the better he comes across 😆
 
I think calling your own baby delicious might just be at a push OK. But someone else's is just odd. Especially in the context of it written down so there is no nuance.
Poor Jim, lots of other people could say it and it probably wouldn't seem wierd and creepy. He has such an unfortunate SM manner though. He says such peculiar things.
 
Yeah, I'm a native Spanish and English speaker and in some countries when you say "el delicioso" (the delicious) it's a slang term for, kind of a sleazy way of calling sex. So I'd never call a baby delicious. You can say they smell delicious, I've heard that plenty which I don't get but okay, but they're NOT delicious themselves :p

Definitely not Spain Spanish though is it? I find Latin American Spanish a lot more sleazy than og Spanish.
 
Definitely not Spain Spanish though is it? I find Latin American Spanish a lot more sleazy than og Spanish.

Yeah, I've heard it said in Mexico and some Central American countries.

Castilian Spanish has its own sleazy phrases though, just not that one :P
---

I see that Jim's twin brother and his family already met Margot, the little cousins meeting was cute, I'll admit. And I guess it goes to show that there's really no hate from the Chapman family to Sarah or anything.
 
I don’t understand this. According to Sarah’s logic, because Jim and his brother are not identical twins, their kids aren’t “more than cousins.”

Huh? Even if Jim and his brother were identical, their kids would still only be cousins. Whether they’re identical or fraternal twins or twins at all is totally irrelevant?
 

Attachments

  • 4CA774AA-3297-4CFA-8A74-E0E76B29CB90.jpeg
    4CA774AA-3297-4CFA-8A74-E0E76B29CB90.jpeg
    83.2 KB · Views: 708
I don’t understand this. According to Sarah’s logic, because Jim and his brother are not identical twins, their kids aren’t “more than cousins.”

Huh? Even if Jim and his brother were identical, their kids would still only be cousins. Whether they’re identical or fraternal twins or twins at all is totally irrelevant?
Maybe because identical twins split from the same egg their kids would in that way have been more connected in Sarah's mind as they would also have technically come from that same egg? I'm just guessing here though lol!
 
I don’t understand this. According to Sarah’s logic, because Jim and his brother are not identical twins, their kids aren’t “more than cousins.”

Huh? Even if Jim and his brother were identical, their kids would still only be cousins. Whether they’re identical or fraternal twins or twins at all is totally irrelevant?
I think with the children of identical twins they would still be cousins but in terms of genetics it would be more like half-siblings.
 
Maybe because identical twins split from the same egg their kids would in that way have been more connected in Sarah's mind as they would also have technically come from that same egg? I'm just guessing here though lol!
I think with the children of identical twins they would still be cousins but in terms of genetics it would be more like half-siblings.
True, children of identical twins would be more genetically similar than those of fraternal twins (who are basically normal siblings that just happen to be born at the same time). But they’d still be considered cousins on a social level because their dads are brothers… not the same person? I’m probably reading too much into this because I myself am a twin haha
 
Status
Thread locked. We start a new thread when they have over 1000 posts, click the blue button to see all threads for this topic and find the latest open thread.
Back
Top