Jack Monroe #588 Slop making sense

Status
Thread locked. We start a new thread when they have over 1000 posts, click the blue button to see all threads for this topic and find the latest open thread.
1
I couldn't give a hoot about her socks on twitter. If she is sad enough and pathetic enough( and we all know she) to attack a man on twitter where only a handful of people can actually see, because her socks will have little to no following and is i am sure isn't massive. To me its a bit like farting in a field and asking does it stink! If that bloke wants to moan for the rest of his life about her not buying his house that is his right. She would and any of her monkeys would be better to just to ignore him. He will either get bored or others will eventually ignore him.
 
I’ve said it before but I am very much over the house sale. I’m staggered he’s still going on about it.
Morally she was out of line but she did not need to buy that house and if I were her I wouldn’t have bought it either (for several reasons). The fact he’s content to argue about it on Twitter with either her as a sock, or a perfect stranger, suggests to me he’s as much of a wanker as she is.
Suck it up and move on - if his house was that great, someone else would have bought it by now.

I’m sorry for his loss and the impact that Jack acting like Jack has had on him, but FFS, how long is he going to keep it up for?

Yes, she clearly has the best part of 200k at her disposal. That’s the real story here IMO.
 
It’s not odd he found it, it’s odd that he’d choose to randomly start using it given it’s not her name now or something that most people would think to refer to her as. Calling her grifter would make sense or cack or slopgoblin, there’s an obvious motivation there but to use her old name? Odd.
He started using it as the sock said “I’m not Jack” although clearly it was. So he said “okay how about Mel then”?
She’s not trans at all so I have no issue with how she is referred to. Hateful person.
---
I’ve said it before but I am very much over the house sale. I’m staggered he’s still going on about it.
Morally she was out of line but she did not need to buy that house and if I were her I wouldn’t have bought it either (for several reasons). The fact he’s content to argue about it on Twitter with either her as a sock, or a perfect stranger, suggests to me he’s as much of a wanker as she is.
Suck it up and move on - if his house was that great, someone else would have bought it by now.

I’m sorry for his loss and the impact that Jack acting like Jack has had on him, but FFS, how long is he going to keep it up for?

Yes, she clearly has the best part of 200k at her disposal. That’s the real story here IMO.
He’s still going on about it because SHE keeps going on about it by creating sock accounts and then following him around.
I’d bloody well be doing the same on his position.
 
It felt like it! We got told off, I think? It was heaps funny though, someone will know exactly which thread. Not me, maybe @Valiofthedolls?
Lol I genuinely can’t even remember that happening, sorry dearestheart! ❤
IMG_5577.gif

As soon as the pottery popped up, I must have gone into one of Jack’s fugue states caused by the memory of scampering for sea pottery.
IMG_5578.jpeg
IMG_5580.jpeg
 
Last edited:
He started using it as the sock said “I’m not Jack” although clearly it was. So he said “okay how about Mel then”?
She’s not trans at all so I have no issue with how she is referred to. Hateful person.
---

He’s still going on about it because SHE keeps going on about it by creating sock accounts and then following him around.
I’d bloody well be doing the same on his position.
Well he could not engage and they’d soon go away. As I’ve said here before, she said in a guardian interview years ago that she had sick accounts as far back as 2014 - those accounts will still be knocking around now and will look like established accounts. I know there are some on here who aren’t convinced it’s her, but the chances are it is - or another absolute whack job. One way or another, you get the behaviour you allow, so by continuing to engage is giving her what she wants.
 
I don't recall any of them being so sugar deprived and/or having such a sugar addiction that they had to carry a big jar of sweets with them around the house. If they were craving something sweet, they just....went to the kitchen and ate something sweet. But no, guest being the most sober soberest person of all time, had to elevenrife this into lugging a gigantic stash of goodies everywhere :rolleyes:
Including carrying in her bag at all times a a bottle of barbecue sauce and a tin of Del Monte wrapped in a jazzy shirt
IMG_5581.jpeg
Tragic twit.
 
MCM, was it Toby jugs? I don’t remember Jack as Toby jugs but found this and wondered if it was the start of something?

 
He’s still going on about it because SHE keeps going on about it by creating sock accounts and then following him around.
I’d bloody well be doing the same on his position.
That’s my impression too. He’s getting on with his business, posts an angling video and the latest sock/troll pops up to say, “Oh, fishing is it, stopped wanging on about your crappy flat then have you?”
Meanwhile the sworn enemies of Pokey & The Chimp jump in to howl, “There are swans in that lake you absolute monster!”
A shower of tit the lot of them.
 
Then he doesn’t have parental rights so it’s as much on him as it is on her. The bare minimum of Dadding is making sure you have rights so you can protect your kid if needed. Especially after she’s changed his name withoit your consent, that would be a wake up call to anyone who gave a duck.
I used to work within a related team, and is parental responsibilities not rights. Ie parents are responsible for makin ing choices on behalf of their children but don't have ultimate rights over them. If baby daddy is on the birth certificate or gone to court to get it he will have PR. A parent couldn't legally change a name without permission of the other parent, but could tell the school the child is 'known as'

. Essentially the resident parent doesn't need to consult on day to day decisions (what food they eat, what they wear) but need agreement on bigger decisions eh where they go to school.

It is a complex area of law and the baby daddy doesn't seem very bright so probably doesn't like understand.
 
Last edited:
MCM, was it Toby jugs? I don’t remember Jack as Toby jugs but found this and wondered if it was the start of something?

I'm sure it was plates or bowls? Bowls seems familiar. It went for a few pages? Gosh I hope I'm not remembering a dream....
---
Found one post, it's #18 on thread 554 so it must've been the previous thread. By @StatusWoe
IMG_5067.png
 
Last edited:
I used to work within a related team, and is parental responsibilities not rights. Ie parents are responsible for makin ing choices on behalf of their children but don't have ultimate rights over them. If baby daddy is on the birth certificate or gone to court to get it he will have PR. A parent couldn't legally change a name without permission of the other parent, but could tell the school the child is 'known as'

. Essentially the resident parent doesn't need to consult on day to day decisions (what food they eat, what they wear) but need agreement on bigger decisions eh where they go to school.

It is a complex area of law and the baby daddy doesn't seem very bright so probably doesn't like understand.

I worked in a school and if a mum with PR had told the school that a child called Jane Smith on her birth cert was now going to be known as Jane Jones and then the Dad also with PR came along and said “No, her name is Jane Smith” then the child would be Jane Smith regardless of how much the mum clawed and wailed. In the case of a dispute like that, the default was always what was on the birth certificate (or any formal deed poll). It wasn’t actually that uncommon for the situation to crop up either.

So even at a school level, if SB’s dad had PR then she couldn’t change his name.

Unless it turns out actually the “name change” was Christopher deciding he wanted to be called Chris or similar nickname. Then while formal docs would still go home as Christopher if the father objected, there’s a fair chance the day to day stuff would have the name the kid wrote himself on it.
 
Well he could not engage and they’d soon go away. As I’ve said here before, she said in a guardian interview years ago that she had sick accounts as far back as 2014 - those accounts will still be knocking around now and will look like established accounts. I know there are some on here who aren’t convinced it’s her, but the chances are it is - or another absolute whack job. One way or another, you get the behaviour you allow, so by continuing to engage is giving her what she wants.

I do think she has socks, but I’m just not convinced all these are her. Some seem to be taking great pleasure in winding Carpdude up in a more subtle way I’m not sure Jack is quite capable of - the voice doesn’t consistently sound like her to me, there’s phrases that anyone who’d read here could parrot then different tone.

But either way, absolutely he is encouraging either her or the other weirdos by continuing to engage. He was bigged up by pokesquig as going to be her downfall but he’s just not and she didn’t do anything that heinous to him. He needs to get over it and move on.
 
I worked in a school and if a mum with PR had told the school that a child called Jane Smith on her birth cert was now going to be known as Jane Jones and then the Dad also with PR came along and said “No, her name is Jane Smith” then the child would be Jane Smith regardless of how much the mum clawed and wailed. In the case of a dispute like that, the default was always what was on the birth certificate (or any formal deed poll). It wasn’t actually that uncommon for the situation to crop up either.

So even at a school level, if SB’s dad had PR then she couldn’t change his name.

Unless it turns out actually the “name change” was Christopher deciding he wanted to be called Chris or similar nickname. Then while formal docs would still go home as Christopher if the father objected, there’s a fair chance the day to day stuff would have the name the kid wrote himself on it.
The difference is for a legal name change anyone with pr would need to actively agree. For a informal name change they would have to actively object.

If baby daddy had approached the school and said he injected to the name change it wouldn't have happened. However I don't think he is bright enough to work this out.
 
Well, at least she didn't recommend saving money on fruit by shoplifting tins of Mel Donte.

The more I look at that article, the more ridiculous it gets. From seeing friends get sober, I know it's true that they have more of a sweet tooth because they're not getting the sugars they would be getting from booze. But I don't recall any of them being so sugar deprived and/or having such a sugar addiction that they had to carry a big jar of sweets with them around the house. If they were craving something sweet, they just....went to the kitchen and ate something sweet. But no, guest being the most sober soberest person of all time, had to elevenrife this into lugging a gigantic stash of goodies everywhere :rolleyes:
What about rotten ouchy teeth 🦷 Jack?
 
Status
Thread locked. We start a new thread when they have over 1000 posts, click the blue button to see all threads for this topic and find the latest open thread.
Back
Top