I agree that the patreon numbers look real, based on the public information about how many subscribers she had at the time. The huge bump in Jan 22 is entirely feasible given that she surged to 800+ subs off the back of the VBI/Nigella plug and that many of those would have chosen to sub up for a year as its cheaper. Right now she's got about 300I think it's 100% real. The fact she hasn't tried to denounce it and has instead been frantically dirty deleting tells me she knows she's been rumbled and is shitting herself. I was going to say something about a guilty conscience but I honestly don't think she has the capacity for that. All she'll be thinking about is her own skin and how this impacts on the grift.
I know I've banged on about it before and there's all the spending but I still think she's got a good nest egg hidden away. She's a cunning, manipulative grifter. You can be thick and still have a kind of base intelligence.
She will be absolutely fine. People like her always are. Chaff rises.
I've just been reading some of the comments on Xwitter about this and I can't see how she can come back from this. At the very least, she ought to be investigated on some level. Do you think she's been declaring any of this income to HMRC?
I agree that the patreon numbers look real, based on the public information about how many subscribers she had at the time. The huge bump in Jan 22 is entirely feasible given that she surged to 800+ subs off the back of the VBI/Nigella plug and that many of those would have chosen to sub up for a year as its cheaper. Right now she's got about 300suckersSubscribers - if we assume they're paying close to the lowest tier (£3.50pm) then the sum of £1200 that's now displayed on her Patreon and by the hack checks out. It's all absolutely feasible based on the public numbers - what boggles me is her bare faced lies about it. Also I can well believe one of the reasons Harold did a runner was her messy money stuff.
We can't know, of course, though we may have our suspicions. I really, really hope she hasn't.I've just been reading some of the comments on Xwitter about this and I can't see how she can come back from this. At the very least, she ought to be investigated on some level. Do you think she's been declaring any of this income to HMRC?
I don't think so tbh, I think she's got a spending addiction and when she gets a lump of money in, spends compulsively on sideboards, make up, penhaligons, fancy designer clothes etc etc.
Then she panics and does a blog beg. Gets more money in. Repeat.
If you match her biggest blog begs against evidence of spending (eg DKL - Edinburgh trip & sideboards; Jan '22 - massive snowfall; HH2 - European trips) you can see this pattern, imho.
On a related note, HH2 gets more egregious and shameless every time I re-read it. It's like every time I re-read, something new and terrible reveals itself that I hadn't noticed before, like grifty Cormac McCarthy novel. Sheesh.
I'm certain this is all real. It really ties up with everything we've been speculating on for years on here. The info may be ill-gotten, but it's accurate. The only thing I don't believe is the claim that she's NEVER sent out anything. We have screenshots in earlier threads about rewards being sent out in the early days of Patreon. Her way of Patreoning is actually particularly stupid (there's a surprise). Sending out lots of physical rewards regularly (ONCE A WEEK for TSOB) is time consuming AND expensive (postage, printing). That's why most Patreon's work best with digital rewards, like podcasts, e-books, music, etc. and only occassional physical rewards for long-term or high-tier subscribers.I agree that the Patreon numbers look real, based on the public information about how many subscribers she had at the time. The huge bump in Jan 22 is entirely feasible given that she surged to 800+ subs off the back of the VBI/Nigella plug and that many of those would have chosen to sub up for a year as its cheaper. Right now she's got about 300suckersSubscribers - if we assume they're paying close to the lowest tier (£3.50pm) then the sum of £1200 that's now displayed on her Patreon and by the hack checks out. It's all absolutely feasible based on the public numbers - what boggles me is her bare faced lies about it. Also I can well believe one of the reasons Harold did a runner was her messy money stuff.
I also suspect she billybullshitted her way through that weekend away for Harold’s mum’s birthday to such an extent that they rang him afterwards and told him what they thought of her.
I‘d love to know their conversations in the car on the way home.
I also suspect she billybullshitted her way through that weekend away for Harold’s mum’s birthday to such an extent that they rang him afterwards and told him what they thought of her.
I‘d love to know their conversations in the car on the way home.
She's the Al Capone of "food". All the crappy things she's done, and it'll be tax that takes her down.
Which is what Essex Girl said about her.
That guest never managed to save anything in a month where she was doing well so she had savings for a month where she had little or no income. The minute she got any money, she spunked the lot on tat.
From what we know of her since then, I doubt she's changed at all.
As for her being behind the Patreon leak? Nah, she's too thick and lazy, and everything she touches she makes an unholy mess of.
Agree. The patreon physical rewards as promised were completely unsustainable as a business model. Much easier to not deliver them and just pocket the cash!I'm certain this is all real. It really ties up with everything we've been speculating on for years on here. The info may be ill-gotten, but it's accurate. The only thing I don't believe is the claim that she's NEVER sent out anything. We have screenshots in earlier threads about rewards being sent out in the early days of Patreon. Her way of Patreoning is actually particularly stupid (there's a surprise). Sending out lots of physical rewards regularly (ONCE A WEEK for TSOB) is time consuming AND expensive (postage, printing). That's why most Patreon's work best with digital rewards, like podcasts, e-books, music, etc. and only occassional physical rewards for long-term or high-tier subscribers.
If she had fulfilled her Pateron as designed, the £130,000 over 6 years wouldn't have been that much, because something like £50,000 would have had to be spent on the actual rewards and the remaining money works out at around 20 hours per week on minimum wage. I suspect she would have to spend close to that time per week on keeping the Patreon rewards going - remember, it's not just the physical job of constantly printing and posting postcards, but also creating new recipes, photographing everything, writing scathing essays, etc. If she actually did any of this, her Patreon earnings would be justified and if anything, low.