Re Furlough. No I won’t drop it
Jack claimed to be paying Caroline out of her own pocket, and that she’d purchased her a laptop and/or tablet (assuming previously she’d used a moleskine and a BIC 4 colour pen, WFK)
This prompted a great big PayPal tip jar rattle, for reasons. Everyone knows an austerity cook (lols) who publishes recipes (double lols) on her blog and SM needs a PA in the middle of a national lockdown.
Or two? Jack seemed to allude at one point IIRC there were two Carolines working diligently, full wages paid, shiny new laptop in hand.
But Caz MkII was never heard of again so likely never existed and was invented to double the nonexistent burden on our saviour of the poors and therefore increase the TYFATYD cashos into her PayPal. Much grift.
However, the HMRC site shows Jack claimed furlough for two people. So at best (??) that would be herself and Caroline. Making her ‘paid out of pocket’ claims a big fibby fib.
She further claims that Caroline, owner of hands, LEFT on the very day furlough ended. Does this make sense? Wouldn’t furlough ending indicate ‘back to work’ for Guest and she’d be able to pay Caroline as presumably she had done prior to Covid?
Did Caroline work for her pre Covid? (Is there evidence?) If not, why would you take on a PA at the quietest time work wise then complain you’d have to pay her out of pocket?
Now… bear with me here… but did Caroline actually exist? Don’t we only have Jack’s Twitter feed and a few posts on Patreon (and a new joiner here desperate to prove they were she).
As for the two people on the claim.. it could be ANYONE. Family members for example. It’s amazing how many employees some businesses suddenly had when money was on offer!
Then, with no evidence of a penny paid back, the company is dissolved.
It’s all very Netflix investigation but.. what if?