Wouldn't the fact that all these MP's who own multiple properties mean they are disproportionately affected by the cladding issue? They will be expected to pay for reclading each and every property they own. (Not that I feel sorry for them or anything, just pointing out the absurdity of her argument)
Is she suggesting that the government should pay for the reclading of these properties? Or is she is expecting the developers to pay? Because they would just dissolve the company. Or is she is expecting the freeholder to pay? They are often overseas owners, so good luck with that. If others do end up paying, these buy to let landlord MP's get let off the hook.
There should be help for owner occupiers without doubt, but many people used their money to buy retal properties as a pension income. It is not as easy as owner occupiers good, landlords bad.
Also it is not only Conservative MP's that are landlords and property developers either.
I was a Building Surveyor, spent many years studying to become qualified (not just a couple of weeks induction being given 1000 folders to memorise), and believe me, she hasn't got a clue. It is a complex issue, both in construction and legally, one that she couldn't ever understand. I could write for hours on the matter, but you'd be bored to tears.