lilchicken
Well-known member
This vid takes on a whole other tone
Isobel Lorna
- Thread starter chapterthree
- Start date
1
This vid takes on a whole other tone
ldngirlxoxo
Active member
Such hard work spreading your legs a few times a week 
she is literally a prostitute. Just proves so much of social media is just smoke and mirrors. It’s a shame she didn’t finish her apprenticeship because she wont be getting an income like this forever and when it dies down she will have nothing to fall back on career wise as she isn’t this successful business woman she portrays.
she is literally a prostitute. Just proves so much of social media is just smoke and mirrors. It’s a shame she didn’t finish her apprenticeship because she wont be getting an income like this forever and when it dies down she will have nothing to fall back on career wise as she isn’t this successful business woman she portrays.trashtalker36
Active member
She has referenced this thread before so if she chooses to ignore these allegations it’s a sure admission of guilt.
Killerheels
Well-known member
Absolutely. She's
lying. She's looking away from the camera at certain times, it's an involuntary reaction we all do when we're hiding a secret. She might have started the company for sure, but found a easier way to make cash, as a call-girl. I'd be interested to see some of her punters......
---
She isSuch hard work spreading your legs a few times a week
a prostitute. You can dress it up but as her client says - she's a working girl. Now she might not carry on with it *if* this SM following takes off. But the more famous she becomes the harder the fall will be, when it becomes public. As it will....
Last edited:
trashtalker36
Active member
Absolutely. She's
---
She is
Literally no better than that Lily Phillips or Bonnie Blue
---
On second thoughts, she’s worse than Lilly Phillips or the other one. Both those girls, albeit crudely, are open about the fact that they make money from sleeping with men.
Isobel flaunts a faux boss girl aesthetic and says that she wants to be inspirational to young girls. She is purposely misleading young women and trying to convince them that they too, can purchase a birkin and VC jewellery if they work hard enough. It’s totally unrealistic and quite concerning given that she is literally selling her vagina. Showing off material possessions is more important to her than protecting her own worth.
Even if she does not do this anymore and now makes enough money from influencing, she is not making money from this ‘company’ and she needs to address this before it gets out of control.
Last edited:
lilchicken
Well-known member
Also… you can 100% see what someone makes via companies house, or at least gauge. Businesses submit accounts which don’t go into granular detail but give a rough idea of profits and overheads.
I used it to do some due diligence on tradespeople I hired for hired renovations and a wedding. My florist for my wedding ripped me off, and I was able to see she was in financial difficulties via companies house, so I’ve used it ever since to get a picture on what’s going on.
she’s talking utter rubbish.
And what can companies house tell us about Voir Social and Isobel?
well for one, the business associated with her personal insta - “Isobel media and consultancy Ltd” is dissolved. its statement of capital was for £1. At the point it was created, she’s used her parents address and not an accountant. So in short… looks as though there wasn’t much money, or an accountant would’ve used their business address and they’d have submitted annual accounts as per their obligations. Even a micro entity has these obligations. And the cash that went through that buisness..was about £200. It owed £200 to be exact.
so she’s dissolved that business in Jan 2024.
at this point she’s created Voir Social Ltd in April 2022 (both as a registered buisness and as an insta account). She uses an accountant to create this business but statement of capital is still £1, not wholly unusual.
companies house have then issued a strike off gazette - presumbably due to lack of filing accounts. But she’s obviously instructed an accountant to negate this.
the company did submit accounts for April 2023 - her incomings were about 20k, but outgoings (debt) was about £10k. So she roughly made about £10k in profit that year. It looks as if this buisness is an accumulation of both her personal insta and any voir social work she apparently gets - the two seem to be intertwined. But these aren’t the records of a thriving buisness with large clients. It looks more like a nice little cash cow but not a thriving business. It definitely doesn’t marry up to the lifestyle she’s showing online.
her accountant seems to be “the showbiz accountant” which is a weird choice… one, it’s based in Liverpool. She has no obvious connections there. It also has no reviews and is tucked away in the Liver building. Very odd.
and why would a marketing agency want a “showbiz” accountant? In a different city?
---
Further to the above…
she registered Voir Social to an address she’s rented by the looks of things.
looks like it was through thelondonoffice.com. The initial address for voir was 167-169 Great Portland Street London W1W 5PF.
thelondonoffice.com
look up the address and there are a ton of businesses using the same address on companies house.
the company is pretty open about helping a business look like it has a “prestigious address”. Reading between the lines… help it look more legitimate.
I used it to do some due diligence on tradespeople I hired for hired renovations and a wedding. My florist for my wedding ripped me off, and I was able to see she was in financial difficulties via companies house, so I’ve used it ever since to get a picture on what’s going on.
she’s talking utter rubbish.
And what can companies house tell us about Voir Social and Isobel?
well for one, the business associated with her personal insta - “Isobel media and consultancy Ltd” is dissolved. its statement of capital was for £1. At the point it was created, she’s used her parents address and not an accountant. So in short… looks as though there wasn’t much money, or an accountant would’ve used their business address and they’d have submitted annual accounts as per their obligations. Even a micro entity has these obligations. And the cash that went through that buisness..was about £200. It owed £200 to be exact.
so she’s dissolved that business in Jan 2024.
at this point she’s created Voir Social Ltd in April 2022 (both as a registered buisness and as an insta account). She uses an accountant to create this business but statement of capital is still £1, not wholly unusual.
companies house have then issued a strike off gazette - presumbably due to lack of filing accounts. But she’s obviously instructed an accountant to negate this.
the company did submit accounts for April 2023 - her incomings were about 20k, but outgoings (debt) was about £10k. So she roughly made about £10k in profit that year. It looks as if this buisness is an accumulation of both her personal insta and any voir social work she apparently gets - the two seem to be intertwined. But these aren’t the records of a thriving buisness with large clients. It looks more like a nice little cash cow but not a thriving business. It definitely doesn’t marry up to the lifestyle she’s showing online.
her accountant seems to be “the showbiz accountant” which is a weird choice… one, it’s based in Liverpool. She has no obvious connections there. It also has no reviews and is tucked away in the Liver building. Very odd.
and why would a marketing agency want a “showbiz” accountant? In a different city?
---
Further to the above…
she registered Voir Social to an address she’s rented by the looks of things.
looks like it was through thelondonoffice.com. The initial address for voir was 167-169 Great Portland Street London W1W 5PF.
Director Service Address | The London Office
Ensure your personal address is kept private by using one of our four Central London addresses as your Director Service Address - Only £10 per year.
look up the address and there are a ton of businesses using the same address on companies house.
the company is pretty open about helping a business look like it has a “prestigious address”. Reading between the lines… help it look more legitimate.
Last edited:
Going-dicey
Member
In respect of Companies House — that’s balance sheet only so it isn’t “incomings and outgoings”. Its assets and liabilities. You could be a business generating £1m in revenue and have only £100 in assets and £0 liabilities. Conversely, you could be a business generating £10k in revenue but have assets of £1m and £500k in liabilities. It’s also only a snapshot in time (the date of the balance sheet).
What Companies House does tell us though is that because she’s filing micro entity accounts (I.e. only needs to file her balance sheet), she meets two of the following criteria: (i) a turnover of £632,000 or less (ii) £316,000 or less on its balance sheet (iii) 10 employees or less.
She says she has a few employees. If we operate on the assumption that all of her items aren’t rented/borrowed (big assumption), then I suspect she needs at least £100k of gross revenue to fund her lifestyle (e.g. £15k watch, £20k bag, thousands on clothes, beauty treatments, couple grand on rent per month, couple grand on eating out, etc.). I say gross revenue because there will be corporation tax, capital gains on the dividend, income tax on anything she’s claiming as income, etc. Effective tax rate probably 50%. Appreciate I’m conflating her income/dividend as a director/shareholder and the business’ revenue itself but it’s representative only. She then needs to pay her staff, marketing, accounting software, etc. All in, if she was genuinely funding her lifestyle herself and paying her staff, I can’t see how she’d be able to turnover anything less than £200k. I don’t think there’s a chance in hell she’s doing that. The fact this is coming from an alternative revenue stream makes so much more sense. The money isn’t coming from her parents — they aren’t rich enough. It’s not self made (apprentice earning £17k). And it’s not from her SM business (as you’ve all pointed out she has no real clients).
She acts like she’s frugal on the car but that’s largely irrelevant with how much she’s (supposedly) spending on other luxury goods. It all makes sense now though.
Killerheels
Well-known member
Can we also address the "took care of a fetish" that the client mentioned in his review. Not a porta potty 
- too extreme and degrading for our high class escort - but maybe a golden shower, or role play?
This is getting even more interesting........
---
And the client has been punting for a decade and has also reviewed other girls from escort agencies. Just goes to illustrate that it's not a specific 'IG baddie' thing and she's just the latest in a long-line of escorts for him.
He could be into Dom Sub or Daddy fetish play. I'll leave you to decide what rabbit hole you go down with that!
---
I'm going to wait until she trips herself up. It'll happen..... Don't want to get blocked.
Did think of sending her "review" anonymously to her father's LinkedIn, to rev up her Christmas.....
---
And yes she'd do Porta potty if the price was right.....
- too extreme and degrading for our high class escort - but maybe a golden shower, or role play? This is getting even more interesting........
---
Can we also address the "took care of a fetish" that the client mentioned in his review. Not a porta potty
And the client has been punting for a decade and has also reviewed other girls from escort agencies. Just goes to illustrate that it's not a specific 'IG baddie' thing and she's just the latest in a long-line of escorts for him.
He could be into Dom Sub or Daddy fetish play. I'll leave you to decide what rabbit hole you go down with that!
---
I'm going to wait until she trips herself up. It'll happen..... Don't want to get blocked.
Did think of sending her "review" anonymously to her father's LinkedIn, to rev up her Christmas.....
---
And yes she'd do Porta potty if the price was right.....
Last edited:
lilchicken
Well-known member
super interesting. Wish we could pin stuff to the start of threads lol. This should go into a wiki.
---
Can we also address the "took care of a fetish" that the client mentioned in his review. Not a porta potty
This is getting even more interesting........
do you have a grab of the Reddit user who posted the review? Might get more clues there… I have a few guesses but I’m too prudish to say
lilchicken
Well-known member
I know you’re joking, but in all seriousness I don’t think anything about this should be mentioned off tattle.
if she is engaging in SW (and an anonymous review online isn’t exactly conclusive proof of that) then that’s her private business.
I think the moral of the story here is… social media is rarely ever the full picture.
if she is engaging in SW (and an anonymous review online isn’t exactly conclusive proof of that) then that’s her private business.
I think the moral of the story here is… social media is rarely ever the full picture.
intoresting
VIP Member
Killerheels
Well-known member
Play stupid games, win stupid prizes.
Tattle is of course a public forum, so many lurk but don't post here, I know journos are here as well. (Not me!) As has been said before SW is her choice, but to fabricate stuff about her day job is another.
She has an audience both on TikTok and Instagram, it's grossly misleading. Especially if she's seeing multiple clients a week. I hope she stops now she's more successful, but large amounts of easy money is a powerful drug.
I think she thinks she's smart doing this.
She doesn't realise the health implications of what she's doing, the cancellation aspect if caught out, Tattle today, Sunday Sport tomorrow.
The shame for her family - especially her father a police officer (but that lot are as perverted as her client.) All for a Birkin and laundered cash.
lilchicken
Well-known member
True! But she never mentions any SW. and we shouldn’t be contacting anyone outside of tattle.She plasters her life all over social media
tbh, the first time I saw her profile it felt off, and all the comments and criticisms are out in the open. She is constantly responding to people in the comments or on video who don’t think it all adds up either. I think it’s very obvious she has another revenue stream she isn’t being open about and most people draw their own conclusions.
Killerheels
Well-known member
Well it is illegal to solicit. She's not that stupid.
Plenty of insta girls are on the game, either in Dubai or here. Easy money. If we've found out it's only a matter of time before someone else does. A punter perhaps?
intoresting
VIP Member
I agree I don’t think people should be contacted from chatting here ( think it’s against tattle rules)
But she shouldn’t be bragging across all platforms if she wants it to be kept a secret. People are obviously going to draw their own conclusions if she is dishonest
lilchicken
Well-known member
I mean she self published a book with a spelling mistake in the title. I don’t think anyone is seriously buying she’s an ultra successful girlboss. No one sensible anyway
PettyinPink
Well-known member
this is why I love Tattle - any young women who feel less than for not achieving what she’s “achieved” can see through the smoke and mirrors and decide for themselves if they want to do her literal job
Lechat
VIP Member
Glad there’s a thread on this woman… she came up on my insta explore page and I just found her videos a bit off. Like fair enough if she was from wealth but claiming she’s not but flaunting the Birkin and all the luxury gear… yeah it does not add up in the slightest.
is her bf William Wade?
is her bf William Wade?