Harry & Meghan #53 Ginge & Cringe have no shame, manipulating the public using Diana’s name

Status
Thread locked. We start a new thread when they have over 1000 posts, click the blue button to see all threads for this topic and find the latest open thread.
1
bubbadabut said:
I was in the shower earlier when an idea came to me (I get all my best ideas in the shower). I was going to ask Pom but I didn't want to overburden her as she is spinning plates at the moment, so I thought I'd give it a go myself.

The scenario is...Pom is doing some moonlighting at the Palace, and picks up a mingey trail on the way to the vaults. She senses something is amiss, so calls on Scooby and the mystery crew. When they open the vault they find Meghan, filling her pockets with the Queen's jewels. Harry (aka Shaggy) is aghast, Scooby (Omid) is...confused, and Pom (Scrappy) is very pleased with herself for cracking the case. Have a biscuit.



I need you to know that I have been working on this ALL NIGHT and I was an MS Paint novice (not any more!) so you know... #BeKind and all that shite 😂
Click to expand...

The corgi has the best lines 😂

So just when you think they can't get any more cringeworthy, they announce that they're going into comedy. It just beggars belief what their next truly "unroyal" (don't think that's a word, but you Tattlers get my meaning) thing will be.

Cmon Hazza, get a grip on your boss wife before she has you taking part in another embarrassing episode of Living Life The Markle Way (never seeing pops, bro, nephews, niece, Grandmama, Grandpapa, uncles, aunties, friends, anyone else who knows you).
 
Just_me1954 said:
Click to expand...


We all have to invite those relatives we don’t really care about to family events, and just hope they decline the invitation. Covid travel restrictions is a good reason. 🍿 In any case, we know that this is the H&M camp putting this out there. H&M may be yapping from across the pond, but they do not have the balls to come over.

YeltsinsTank said:
Nobody in the US outside of the Suits fandom knew who Meghan was, and we barely knew who she was as an actress if at all. As someone who watched the show until season 7 or so I think I looked her up on IMDB maybe one time. Her character did a lot of whining (in the end all of them did but hers was the worst) and was probably the worst part of the show. You can actually see the show decline as the main character starts dating her and more of the story revolves around them and less of it revolves around actual legal cases. I didn't know she had a blog-- I didn't even know her name. I think if she disappeared right now in two weeks I'd forget about her. That's probably her worst nightmare. :ROFLMAO:
Click to expand...

She had but a supporting role in Suits, but one would swear she was the main character and she was very well known actress of A-list proportions. She has a massive chip on her shoulder to be the best and that is why she always puts her name first as if SHE was always the well known part of the couple. She is beyond narcissistic.
 
Last edited:
Lufia said:


I tend to only read here, but became curious. Think the birth certificate from Archie was weirdly cropped, the above has the signatures at the bottom.

I usually gossip in the family section of tattle, but I am curious (and hopefully not stepping on anyone's toes), but if they were to show off Archie everyone would claim that they are selling him out, now that they don't, everyone assumes he doesn't exist... what should they do to be believed? Honest question, might have also missed a lot of explanations..you guys are fast o_O:LOL:
Click to expand...
To be believed they have to stop lying. They have to stop their fake PR.
I don't think Archie is the issue. I think the fact that she wants privacy but is all over the place with the facts is the problem.
She was happy to show her bump to everyone, highlighting it at every appearance. There then rise questions because of the change in size of that bump. She sues everyone at the drop of a hat and yet she hasn't sued anyone about that. Yes it might be hard to pick one person but there's been nothing to counter any gossip.
So now she still won't be believed just by showing him because of her previous behaviour.
Archie is only a small part of the problem with their believability.
 
Mikesqueen said:
According to the Daily Mail (also know. As H&M’s diary) they have had a ‘painful’ year as their nanny came back to the UK and moving 4 times left them feeling displaced. Now whose fault is that? It was their choice! How on earth do these two and their minions think we will ever feel sorry for them? All they are doing is coming across as being pathetic as they are complaining about something of their own making. Total drivel.😡
Click to expand...
Falkor said:
If Pom could rustle up Meghan as Delboy and Harry as Rodney...??!
Click to expand...
Ooh yes that would be brilliant... “This time next year, Hazza, we shall be (complete the caption comp)”
 
Just_me1954 said:
Read down to comments of crystal martin. Heaps of ☕ here, especially for the newbies, mostly in Australia.

www.quora.com

Jenn Mary brings up some interesting points, and photos.http://www.quora.com/What-do-you-think-of-Harry-and-Meghan-stepping-down/answer/J...

Jenn Mary brings up some interesting points, and photos.http://www.quora.com/What-do-you-think-of-Harry-and-Meghan-stepping-down/answer/Jenny-Wren-65
www.quora.com www.quora.com
Click to expand...
Thanks it's all interesting stuff.
I'm intrigued about Harry and Meghan having separate bedrooms when they were in Australia as I find that strange for newlyweds.
If they did use a surrogate for the pregnancy then Harry must have been in on the whole deception. I know he's thick but how could she have organised it all without him being any the wiser?
That seems impossible to me.
 
12 days into the new year and I finally get my act together to comment again. I read everything but usually in bed in the evenings and can't be bothered to type any replies😞. Anywhoo..

Reading the speculation on Trooping the Colour and go-no go of the Harkles showing up. I'm sure it's their PR churning out the speculation but I can't see them showing up even if it's privately behind closed doors. Publicity is their oxygen and if the only way to be involved (after pissing literally everyone in the family off) is joining private afternoon tea or a lunch with the family, it would be awkward AF for everyone.

Their self-righteous airy fairy bullshit is so out-of-touch and out-of-place in the current world. On a micro level same goes for everyday people on FB etc. posting about donations to food banks or their kids donating toys; just bleeping do it, without expecting some major pat on the head. Sick.of.it.all😤
 
Ms_Fi said:
With the birth certificate - I don’t think the copies have signatures as they’re a certified copy of the original entry (not the actual original document). The handwritten document is the original entry.

What I think is odd is that the ‘signature’ says “Harry”, not “Henry”. surely he would have had to sign with his legal name (as detailed in the ‘fathers info’ but, not his nickname.
Click to expand...
Yes I agree and I hate to play devil's advocate where these two are concerned, but that's what my kids birth certificates look like. We definitely signed in the presence of the registrar but then she fed it all into the computer and it was only she who signed the printed copies, which were then given to us.
 
mardymare said:
Excerpt from season 2/3 Suits promo/interview - this will have you all cringing İ am sure - you have been warned.........notice that she mentions that her Dad is a lighting director in passing....

Click to expand...

It strikes me from watching her body language in that , that the best way to irritate her going forward would be for lots of people to just keep getting her name slightly wrong....
 
Chum said:
12 days into the new year and I finally get my act together to comment again. I read everything but usually in bed in the evenings and can't be bothered to type any replies😞. Anywhoo..

Reading the speculation on Trooping the Colour and go-no go of the Harkles showing up. I'm sure it's their PR churning out the speculation but I can't see them showing up even if it's privately behind closed doors. Publicity is their oxygen and if the only way to be involved (after pissing literally everyone in the family off) is joining private afternoon tea or a lunch with the family, it would be awkward AF for everyone.

Their self-righteous airy fairy bullshit is so out-of-touch and out-of-place in the current world. On a micro level same goes for everyday people on FB etc. posting about donations to food banks or their kids donating toys; just bleeping do it, without expecting some major pat on the head. Sick.of.it.all😤
Click to expand...
View attachment 385201 q
Yes definitely. Their PR works non stop with guff stories just to keep them in the public eye. The above post sums it up well. That's what the Harkles are paying thousands per month for.
 
Mikesqueen said:
According to the Daily Mail (also know. As H&M’s diary) they have had a ‘painful’ year as their nanny came back to the UK and moving 4 times left them feeling displaced. Now whose fault is that? It was their choice! How on earth do these two and their minions think we will ever feel sorry for them? All they are doing is coming across as being pathetic as they are complaining about something of their own making. Total drivel.😡
Click to expand...
The only interesting line in Scobie's Grazia story, summarised in the Mail, is the bit about the Nanny not going to LA, but returning to the UK.

That fits with the theory they had part time access to 'Archie' in Canada (remember the security team saying Archie lived in a separate property so they had to patrol three locations) but haven't had access since then. That child lives in Canada, I'd guess, with its birth mum.

https://www.12ft.io/https://www.dai...ear-Megxit-Finding-Freedom-authors-claim.html
 
Tiddlypom said:
It strikes me from watching her body language in that , that the best way to irritate her going forward would be for lots of people to just keep getting her name slightly wrong....
Click to expand...
She has such an air of slight menace about her. The sort of person you really wouldn't want to catch on a bad day. She tries to hide it more these days. It still comes out in the micro-expressions but it was definitely more evident back then.

The interviewer should've done her research better but Megzy clearly doesn't like the fact she doesn't possess instant name recognition. 😂
 
20 seconds in and Rachel MM is basking in the Suits glow yet again. 'Foodie' vibes. İ am being unashamedly mean when İ say İ think she is obviously wearing a wig here - look at her real side hairline.......İ don't care - if she were a nice person İ would ignore and accept her in totality....

 
mardymare said:
20 seconds in and Rachel MM is basking in the Suits glow yet again. 'Foodie' vibes. İ am being unashamedly mean when İ say İ think she is obviously wearing a wig here - look at her real side hairline.......İ don't care - if she were a nice person İ would ignore and accept her in totality....

Click to expand...

Yes about the hair. Ive never been able to trust people who can go from a smile to the instant face-drop thing. It just makes me think they are fake and insincere. She does it twice there but it's a regular thing from what I've seen. A genuine smile fades gradually; hers in gone in a finger click.
 
Timeline - season 6 Suits tv appearance. İ believe this is her real hair straightened and smoothed because it looks natural and suits her the best. Funny one of the interviewers trod on her feet at the beginning. Shameless merching for dog biscuits and 'philanthropic' sandals. Can't imagine MM or her bunions would be seen dead in Fleeps.....


Timeline season 5 Suits tv interview in fashion week. Speaking bullshit about fitting and tailoring clothes to fit. Love the female intereviewer throwing shade by referencing Gwyneth Paltrow's Goop.....irritating as ever.....hair is another wig İ believe but this time she has brought the sides forward to hide her natural hairline.....

 
Last edited:
mardymare said:
Timeline - season 6 Suits tv appearance. İ believe this is her real hair straightened and smoothed because it looks natural and suits her the best. Funny one of the interviewers trod on her feet at the beginning. Shameless merching for dog biscuits and 'philanthropic' sandals. Can't imagine MM or her bunions would be seen dead in Fleeps.....


Timeline season 5 Suits tv interview in fashion week. Speaking bullshit about fitting and tailoring clothes to fit. Love the female intereviewer throwing shade by referencing Gwyneth Paltrow's Goop.....irritating as ever.....hair is another wig İ believe but this time she has brought the sides forward to hide her natural hairline.....

Click to expand...

Ugh I watched a bit of those interviews but I can't stand Smeggys voice for too long and her transparent fakeness.
Merching and talking about TV/fashion/lifestyle is the right level for her. She should never have thought that she could go higher.

When she tries to be the enlightened feminist 🤮 and saviour of the planet it just doesn't work because she seems so incredibly phoney.
 
Status
Thread locked. We start a new thread when they have over 1000 posts, click the blue button to see all threads for this topic and find the latest open thread.
Back
Top