Harry & Meghan #474 Crease is the word, is the word...

Status
Thread locked. We start a new thread when they have over 1000 posts, click the blue button to see all threads for this topic and find the latest open thread.
1
They were supposed to host Christmas lunch at Anmer Hall for Carole and Michael, Catherine's sister and brother and their OHs and all the children. More room there as you say to run around.

If William and Catherine were going to host the family lunch they'd have made preparations some time back. Now with W&C going to Sandringham the rest of the family will go somewhere else, likely the Middleton family home Bucklebury Manor? If so, Carole will need to get a move on. The cousins the Wales children will be catching up with now will be the Tindalls plus any PBs, at Sandringham.

It's a big last-minute change to make, especially as it's the hosts who are cancelling it, and imo it's against their wishes as there's no contest between Sandringham with TPB et al and her own close family who have always supported her.

I think William has not been in a position for some time to either do what Catherine wants or defend her.
Maybe KC is not as healthy as it seems and this might be the last time he can face a full family gathering.
Camilla hasn’t been too well either.

It’s only lunch. There will be other get togethers over the Christmas visit.
Probably including Catherine and Sophie and a nice bottle of wine while the men take the children out for a bracing walk
 
You should enjoy the:

View attachment 3294578 q

Whereas I think:

View attachment 3294579 q

I bet your the sort of person who has already sneaked a look at your Christmas presents and opened your advent calendar :ROFLMAO:;)
opened your advent calendar

I couldn't help it - there were chocolates in it.

PE9fb_ZAz3DirqEdMpxKDO_LjIGMkETxC4_UodV48&usqp=CAU.jpg
 
Daily Mail
"The Prince and Princess of Wales will celebrate Christmas at Sandringham with King Charles and the rest of the royal family.....

"... they will join srnior members of The Firm for the annual Christmas Day Service at St Mary Magdalene Church in Sandringham on December 25.

"Charles, who is currently in Sandringham, is 'delighted' that the whole family will be together for the holidays - with the monarch reportedly overseeing the planning himself.

"One insider said: 'The King is embracing the Christmas period already and really getting into the spirit. Staff who have seen him this week remarked how happy and healthy he was looking.'

"Charles and Camilla are reportedly spending the weekend at the Norfolk estate, with one source explaining how Charles is 'enjoying time outdoors' as he continues his cancer treatment.

"Charles was diagnosed with an undisclosed form of cancer earlier this year."

...................
D Mail also reports that Catherine will attend the Amir's lunch at BP. Every day it's different, as the last report said that she'd "head home" after taking the Amir + 1 to be greeted by Chuck at BP, so who knows.
 
Can chuck volunteer himself for assisted dying now? Or will he hold onto his Christian faith?
I'm so disgusted that this law is coming in. Our government truly hates us and our state will turn into Logans Run soon enough 🤬
I absolutely agree with an assisted dying law. Some of the people I work with are in a pitiful state. No quality of life whatsoever, but at the moment we drag them on to the very bitter end whether they want it or not. It’s downright cruel.
 
Re Christmas at Sandringham - the papers make it up as they go along to get clicks.
They contradict themselves often as well.

Even if we see all of the family and in-laws walking in and out of the Church service, we won't know who is having lunch (and/or staying over) at Sandringham.

Unless of course the press photographers hide in the bushes to snap cars coming and going.
 
I absolutely agree with an assisted dying law. Some of the people I work with are in a pitiful state. No quality of life whatsoever, but at the moment we drag them on to the very bitter end whether they want it or not. It’s downright cruel.


I agree. If I'm in a position where I might start going slowly (very likely, as per family history), I'd rather do it on my own terms - quickly, as painlessly as possible, and before my organs become unusable for others.

I've seen what the extended family did to my grandmother (she enabled them all her life, but no one deserves the drama and to be put on show, just keeping the heart beating long enough for the timing to be convenient for certain people) and grandfather (not her husband, the other one - a fiercely independent man who was deliberately isolated and forced into dementia. I hate how confused he must have been in his lucid moments. We didn't have the option to bring him to live with us. Karma hasn't hit the people involved), when they became slightly vulnerable.


I could just look at a close-up of Smegsy's feet when the time comes, but that seems like a horrific way to go 😱😂
 
Any Ho's iron any ho's iron any any any ho's iron
She looks beat never looks a treat
She thinks the iron is for strapping to her feet
Dressed in black like an old sack with her fathers old green tie on
Oh she wouldn't show her tuppence cos her tits might sag
Ho's iron ho's iron
 
I absolutely agree with an assisted dying law. Some of the people I work with are in a pitiful state. No quality of life whatsoever, but at the moment we drag them on to the very bitter end whether they want it or not. It’s downright cruel.
As my husband said, just because it is available doesn’t mean it is compulsory.

I volunteer at the hospital and see a lot of people with only days to live. Drugged up but conscious. It’s horrible. There needs to be some way of giving dignity in death.
 
Status
Thread locked. We start a new thread when they have over 1000 posts, click the blue button to see all threads for this topic and find the latest open thread.
Back
Top