Harry & Meghan #469 wave pool wanker

Status
Thread locked. We start a new thread when they have over 1000 posts, click the blue button to see all threads for this topic and find the latest open thread.
1
Prince George and Princess Charlotte are extremely well behaved. So Prince Louis' normal child behaviour stands out. He definitely needs to be steered in the right direction but I think William and Catherine are doing a good job.

He was well behaved here

1729446462412.png

1729446796825.png

1729446470462.png
1729446952400.png
 
Cinnamon.girl said:
Daily Mail 20 October
"Sydney officials 'disappointed' King Charles didn't need to use £30K 'soundproof' toilets built for late Queen's 1992 visit. Officials in Australia were disappointed after missing out on a 'royal flush'."

"Officials were left disappointed after hoping for a ‘royal flush’ when King Charles visited the New South Wales Parliament in Sydney today.
They had been secretly hoping the sovereign might be tempted to avail himself of their facilities during an engagement - what’s known in the royal household as a ‘comfort break’.
That’s because, according to the Australian Daily Telegraph, MPs were desperately hoping to finally get their money’s worth after costly renovations to the toilets 30 years ago in advance of a visit by Queen Elizabeth.
Apparently no expense was spared for the 1992 visit, with the toilet specifically upgraded ahead of Her Majesty’s arrival, to ensure it was ‘soundproof’.
The bathroom renovations are believed to have cost some AUS$18,000 (£9,263) at the time, the equivalent of around $40,000 (£30,000) in today's money - and taxpayers picked up the bill."
....................
This must have been a crushing disappointment for the Aussies, but Chuck was only there for 20 minutes. He'd likely not have wanted to use their loo anyway as he always takes his own specially shaped toilet set everywhere he goes, custom- moulded to the Royal gluteus maximus. Plus a supply of Kleenex Premium Comfort Lavatory Paper.
Plus two highland paintings "Stag At Bay" and "Dead Brace Of Grouse".
Click to expand...
What a waste of bloody money, it's probably true that the royals think everything smells of paint when they visit public places.
 
Cinnamon.girl said:
Daily Mail 20 October
"Sydney officials 'disappointed' King Charles didn't need to use £30K 'soundproof' toilets built for late Queen's 1992 visit. Officials in Australia were disappointed after missing out on a 'royal flush'."

"Officials were left disappointed after hoping for a ‘royal flush’ when King Charles visited the New South Wales Parliament in Sydney today.
They had been secretly hoping the sovereign might be tempted to avail himself of their facilities during an engagement - what’s known in the royal household as a ‘comfort break’.
That’s because, according to the Australian Daily Telegraph, MPs were desperately hoping to finally get their money’s worth after costly renovations to the toilets 30 years ago in advance of a visit by Queen Elizabeth.
Apparently no expense was spared for the 1992 visit, with the toilet specifically upgraded ahead of Her Majesty’s arrival, to ensure it was ‘soundproof’.
The bathroom renovations are believed to have cost some AUS$18,000 (£9,263) at the time, the equivalent of around $40,000 (£30,000) in today's money - and taxpayers picked up the bill."
....................
This must have been a crushing disappointment for the Aussies, but Chuck was only there for 20 minutes. He'd likely not have wanted to use their loo anyway as he always takes his own specially shaped toilet set everywhere he goes, custom- moulded to the Royal gluteus maximus. Plus a supply of Kleenex Premium Comfort Lavatory Paper.
Plus two highland paintings "Stag At Bay" and "Dead Brace Of Grouse".
Click to expand...
If he had used the toilet, the seat would have been on eBay within minutes.
In fact, several seats would have been on ebay
 
Cinnamon.girl said:
I agree, but don't think for a minute it's the Ho's cup of tea as she likes LA glitz, coke and red carpets. If a place has been bought more likely it's a strategic move for residence? Don't know.
Funny how the Montyshitto residents are up in arms and don't want them ruining their peace and quiet, and now the Comporta residents are up in arms and don't want them either. They're like these tankers full of toxic waste that keep trying to dock but get turned away.
This development has been pottering along quietly since 2019, but here some the Stoats and everyghing goes to tit!
---

I think this is right, and that we have our American friends to thank for tipping us off that the Ho was planning on hijacking the mourning walkabout for our Queen.

I think that the walkabout was already been planned by TRF, as the crowds knew and were there waiting as is normal to pay their respects. Maybe the Stoats planned to get there before W&C and be the main attraction, but given the warning from our US friends the Waleses were able to intercept them and all arrive together. This will have caused a delay, as well as getting rid of the film crew that the Sussexes will have organised to capture their grief shots for NetFlix understandable deep sorrow.
No wonder the Ho was spitting mad and dishevelled.
Click to expand...
No wonder the Ho was spitting mad and dishevelled

Stop being polite, say what you mean .......... Pissed as a fart
 
TheCutiePatootie said:
Prince George and Princess Charlotte are extremely well behaved. So Prince Louis' normal child behaviour stands out. He definitely needs to be steered in the right direction but I think William and Catherine are doing a good job.

He was well behaved here

View attachment 3230029 q
View attachment 3230047 q
View attachment 3230031 qView attachment 3230051 q
Click to expand...

I have four children. I am married to someone who does things with property. The games and photos I have of all of them are insanely brilliant and insanely embarrassing.

My youngest baby nearly finished me off - she had all the spirit and fun and everything; and she was off the charts. She is the one that everyone waits for the bat tit crazy from….
 
Chita said:
I've just been looking at the pics of William and Lady Kitty Spencer and her sisters at the recent Centrepoint event.

Lots of comments about "I never knew Lady Kitty has been a Centrepoint ambassodor for 8 years or that William has been patron for 19 years."
Why dont they know?
Because the press don't write about it.
Why not?

Doesn't this just emphasise that the Media ignores all the good work these Aristocrats do and instead puts a constant spotlight on the Harkles pretending to do good work.
The only service they carry out is self service.

The Spencer girls are Diana's blood, they are beautiful, aristocratic, they dress well and have all the ingredients that make people buy print media or click on.
So why does the media focus on the Harkles and not the others who actually do real work for charities?
Click to expand...
Cinnamon.girl said:
@wisebutwild , from your earlier post
".....neither of the Gruesomes spoke up in her defence when it was ‘leaked’ that she was one of the two who was supposed to have made racist remarks about their unborn child."
....................

The Sussexes weren't going to speak up in Catherine's defence when it was "leaked that Catherine was one of the racists", because they spun the lie through Scrotus in his book in the first place. Scrotus denied all knowledge and blamed the publisher, but this came from the Ho, carefully routed through Chuck who foolishly wrote to the Ho about unconscious bias and expressed his regret, then Scrotus, then the Dutch publisher.

The one who should have stood up for DiL Catherine was Chuck, but he threw her under the bus and didn't support her at her Carol Service the week after. Made himself scarce and went to fondle mushrooms with Cam instead.
None of TRF are racists, but any conversation was between Cam and Chuck, not Catherine and Chuck, but Catherine was branded the other racist and carried the can for Cam imo to appease the Ho. It was an agreement and not denied in the press, no RF clap-back or objection, no defence of Catherine.
Click to expand...

I think we all assumed/knew the names of the so called ‘racists’ had been fed to Scobie by the Ho for his book but how do you know it was ......

‘carefully routed through Chuck who foolishly wrote to the Ho about unconscious bias and expressed his regret, then Scrotus, then the Dutch publisher.’

I can’t believe he did this or that it would have been made public if he had. Was it a media story to fill column inches?
 
FrancesDundee80 said:
We all know there was no need for things to happen as they did. But I think we are all glad TRF didn't concede to the demands of two idiots with a disturbed sense of self importance.
Click to expand...

After reading this DM article I suspect the SA tour documentary was the final straw for BP.

.
An indication of just how much the royals had invested in Harry and Meghan's trip to Africa came in the accounts published the following year, which showed the 10-day tour was the most expensive royal trip of the year.

An astonishing £245,643 was spent on scheduled flights and a private jet for the couple and their entourage.

As it unfolded amid favourable press coverage, it was regarded by both government and the Royal Household as a great success.

But then, on the last day of the tour, Harry and Meghan issued a lengthy bombshell statement on their website, in which they whined about the press's treatment of them.

The resulting storm ensured that any lingering goodwill from the tour evaporated in an instant.

And when a few weeks later ITV screened 'Harry and Meghan: An African Journey', reviewers were united in disbelief at the couple's apparent self-absorption in the face of so much real pain and suffering.

Suddenly, the Sussexes seemed not so much the new, modern face of the Royal Family, but a pair of self-absorbed narcissists with deeply flawed judgement.
Click to expand...

https://www.12ft.io/https://www.dai...today-three-months-effectively-cast-Firm.html

Sorry @JAR21 it's not letting me archive.
 
Mollywobbles said:
When I had my knee replacement I found having a wee was hard work. All that sitting down on the loo with a knee that wouldn’t bend, then the effort of standing up.
For a few weeks I didn’t bother with knickers, wore dresses and stood over the toilet and peed straight down into it. Exactly the same stance as Meghan.
Click to expand...

My she-wee has been my friend for years.

I always liked the joke about the little girl marvelling at a boy peeing behind a tree and thinking 'that's a handy thing to bring on a picnic'

Next best thing and it costs a tenner...
 
GeorgiePup said:
Here’s the article:

www.nickiswift.com

Why We Rarely See Kate Middleton's Son Prince Louis In Public - Nicki Swift

While Prince Louis is one of the most entertaining royals to watch, Kate Middleton has a good reason for limiting her youngest child's public appearances.
www.nickiswift.com www.nickiswift.com

In the video you referenced he was pretty disrespectful to his mother. Hopefully his behaviour is better nowadays.
Click to expand...
Louis is a boy with a lot of energy. I don't think that there is any emotional component that is similar to the behavior of Harry at the same age. At the Big Help Out of 2023, there is a video of him shoveling dirt from a wheelbarrow and I was pretty impressed at his strength and diligence. He has shown that he can behave when he has to. Go to 1:51 to see Louis doing his bit.

 
Status
Thread locked. We start a new thread when they have over 1000 posts, click the blue button to see all threads for this topic and find the latest open thread.
Back
Top