Harry & Meghan #469 wave pool wanker

Status
Thread locked. We start a new thread when they have over 1000 posts, click the blue button to see all threads for this topic and find the latest open thread.
1
Elainne said:
How do these committees square it with each other, do they pretend that there isn't a problem, why is everyone scared of saying no to the grifters. There must surely be some people who are disgusted seeing charity money being squandered on first class travel and accommodation, and like you mention clothes for the ho.
I really can't abide this kowtowing to the so called elite by everyone, it's about time we had a revolution same as Russia and France I am starting to think, and that has only been in my thoughts since Elizabeth died.
What a shower of useless wankers we have running things lately.
Click to expand...
I've always been puzzled by the involvement of the RBL. Here's a post from their official website...
download (13).jpeg

(Poppy picture posted just because. ...)

"Working in partnership with the Ministry of Defence, RBL will deliver Team UK to the Invictus Games Whistler Vancouver 2025, following the Invictus Games Dusseldorf 2023."

Dusseldorf 2023 was when whistleblowers Lawless and Cooper were sacked in November for no apparent reason, after the Sussexes were suspected of stealing money. They were asked if they had a hand in the sackings. Sussexes say they pay their own expenses but that's not true. This missing money was never reported in the press, let alone investigated or accounted for.
The Dusseldorf Games had a $30 Million government Grant but were still over budget.
As everything with the Stoats, a veil of secrecy is drawn over their crimes and the serfs are told to move on.

The Whistler games also had a $30 Million Grant but are apparently also over budget and no idea how the gap will be closed. Don't know if this is true.

IG CEO Dominic Reid stood down in July this year for no apparent reason but after Harald accepting the Pat Tillman Award fiasco.

All a shambles pointing in one rotten direction, so why are the Games going ahead with the same shady thieves at the helm? Why are the MoD and RBL enabling the Sussexes?

It's become the Harrold & Ho show, with the veterans as PR fodder for the Stoats who use the vets' disabilities to showcase their own superior royal status and poisonous fake compassion.
 
Cinnamon.girl said:
From your post
"Is blackmail the reason that Charles is acting so peculiar, he knows that if he doesn't accede to the stoats wishes, then his going along with the fake pregnancy or surrogacy will be brought into the public arena?"

Yes I think it is, and I first posted this on here over three years ago, but nobody else has said it's blackmail to my recollection until your post. I think the children are a scam and TRF went along with it, possibly with promises from the Stoats at the time that the end game would be different but the Stoat intention was always this.

The Stoats have achieved the impossible, and if the children were real they wouldn't have got where they have. Chuck knows there are no children or at least no children who should be in the LoS. He put them there against the rules, this is what this circus is all about and the rest is gaslighting.

The Flatpacks are and always have been the key, and racism was a tool used by the Stoats to instil fear into the Monarchy. There's no Never Complain Never Explain, no Grey-Rocking, Chuck is treading water and doing everything he can not to upset the Stoats even though it means throwing William and Catherine under a bus.
Click to expand...
There's no Never Complain Never Explain, no Grey-Rocking, Chuck is treading water and doing everything he can not to upset the Stoats even though it means throwing William and Catherine under a bus.

The more that happens, the more I think you are right. What a selfish, cowardly bar-steward our king is.
 
Last edited:
CELESTE CROCKETT said:
Apart from the limp wet lettuce KC I cant imagine anyone in The Firm wanting them anywhere near Central Europe
Click to expand...
I agree, but don't think for a minute it's the Ho's cup of tea as she likes LA glitz, coke and red carpets. If a place has been bought more likely it's a strategic move for residence? Don't know.
Funny how the Montyshitto residents are up in arms and don't want them ruining their peace and quiet, and now the Comporta residents are up in arms and don't want them either. They're like these tankers full of toxic waste that keep trying to dock but get turned away.
This development has been pottering along quietly since 2019, but here some the Stoats and everyghing goes to tit!
---
FrancesDundee80 said:
If I remember correctly this was an impromptu walkabout. The ILBW and the dimwit were planning on doing a "surprise" walkabout on their own but had contacted American press (of course) and word got out and the one with the four of them was harshly put together.
For everyone it was clear that the ILBW was after a picture of her solo putting flowers on the display - they blocked her from doing it on camera.

I believe Catherine was with her children who had lost Gan Gan and a circus walkabout with the dreadful duo who might or might not have brought cameras and mics along for their reality show was the last thing she wanted to do.

So I think that, by the end, Catherine had no patience at all left for the ILBW shenanigans. I wouldn't be able to have that class and probably would have spit on her ugly pretending face during that walkabout.

Finally, also bear in mind that during those days the ILBW was pushing for conversations about inheritance. Yes, she is a delight.
Click to expand...
I think this is right, and that we have our American friends to thank for tipping us off that the Ho was planning on hijacking the mourning walkabout for our Queen.

I think that the walkabout was already been planned by TRF, as the crowds knew and were there waiting as is normal to pay their respects. Maybe the Stoats planned to get there before W&C and be the main attraction, but given the warning from our US friends the Waleses were able to intercept them and all arrive together. This will have caused a delay, as well as getting rid of the film crew that the Sussexes will have organised to capture their grief shots for NetFlix understandable deep sorrow.
No wonder the Ho was spitting mad and dishevelled.
 
Last edited:
Daily Mail 20 October
"Sydney officials 'disappointed' King Charles didn't need to use £30K 'soundproof' toilets built for late Queen's 1992 visit. Officials in Australia were disappointed after missing out on a 'royal flush'."

"Officials were left disappointed after hoping for a ‘royal flush’ when King Charles visited the New South Wales Parliament in Sydney today.
They had been secretly hoping the sovereign might be tempted to avail himself of their facilities during an engagement - what’s known in the royal household as a ‘comfort break’.
That’s because, according to the Australian Daily Telegraph, MPs were desperately hoping to finally get their money’s worth after costly renovations to the toilets 30 years ago in advance of a visit by Queen Elizabeth.
Apparently no expense was spared for the 1992 visit, with the toilet specifically upgraded ahead of Her Majesty’s arrival, to ensure it was ‘soundproof’.
The bathroom renovations are believed to have cost some AUS$18,000 (£9,263) at the time, the equivalent of around $40,000 (£30,000) in today's money - and taxpayers picked up the bill."
....................
This must have been a crushing disappointment for the Aussies, but Chuck was only there for 20 minutes. He'd likely not have wanted to use their loo anyway as he always takes his own specially shaped toilet set everywhere he goes, custom- moulded to the Royal gluteus maximus. Plus a supply of Kleenex Premium Comfort Lavatory Paper.
Plus two highland paintings "Stag At Bay" and "Dead Brace Of Grouse".
 
Maggiemaynot said:
I love this.
A sweet little four year old takes her curtsy seriously unlike a certain mocking, raddled old nobody.
This little girl will remember this moment for her whole life ❤


View attachment 3229371 q
Click to expand...

When KC3 and QC got off the plane in Sydney not only were there Australian dignitaries waiting to meet them. There was also a 12 year old boy (along with his sister) waiting that was getting his wish to meet KC3 through the Make A Wish Foundation.

When I watched the news about KC3 and QC going to church in Sydney today there was a group of protesters but they were kept on the other side of the road and were outnumbered by the people that had gone to see the royals.

I also noticed that most were young (under say 55) and there was a woman and her 12 year old daughter that had travelled 15 hours from a French speaking island off South Africa to get a glimpse of them.
 
There's an article dated 20th October by Nicki Swift about why we don't see much of Prince Louis. Included in the article is video footage of the Wales family on the balcony for the Platinum Jubilee in June 22, but the date on the video by The Crown Chronicles (@crownchronicles) is dated 6.40 pm 29 December 22.
I don't know how to post it.
I've only ever seen a photo or two of Louis making faces, but this is different.
 
Last edited:
@wisebutwild , from your earlier post
".....neither of the Gruesomes spoke up in her defence when it was ‘leaked’ that she was one of the two who was supposed to have made racist remarks about their unborn child."
....................

The Sussexes weren't going to speak up in Catherine's defence when it was "leaked that Catherine was one of the racists", because they spun the lie through Scrotus in his book in the first place. Scrotus denied all knowledge and blamed the publisher, but this came from the Ho, carefully routed through Chuck who foolishly wrote to the Ho about unconscious bias and expressed his regret, then Scrotus, then the Dutch publisher.

The one who should have stood up for DiL Catherine was Chuck, but he threw her under the bus and didn't support her at her Carol Service the week after. Made himself scarce and went to fondle mushrooms with Cam instead.
None of TRF are racists, but any conversation was between Cam and Chuck, not Catherine and Chuck, but Catherine was branded the other racist and carried the can for Cam imo to appease the Ho. It was an agreement and not denied in the press, no RF clap-back or objection, no defence of Catherine.
 
Cinnamon.girl said:
There's an article dated 20th October by Nicki Swift about why we don't see much of Prince Louis. Included in the article is video footage of the Wales family on the balcony for the Platinum Jubilee in June 22, but the date on the video by The Crown Chronicles (@crownchronicles) is dated 6.40 pm 29 December 22.
I don't know how to post it.
I've only ever seen a photo or two of Louis making faces, but this is different.
Click to expand...
Here’s the article:

www.nickiswift.com

Why We Rarely See Kate Middleton's Son Prince Louis In Public - Nicki Swift

While Prince Louis is one of the most entertaining royals to watch, Kate Middleton has a good reason for limiting her youngest child's public appearances.
www.nickiswift.com www.nickiswift.com

In the video you referenced he was pretty disrespectful to his mother. Hopefully his behaviour is better nowadays.
 
Chita said:
Does she EVER get to the point?
I gave up after only a short while. She was waffling about having a nightmare when she used to live in Portugal.

Did she say anything of interest?
I'm sorry but I can't be arsed to listen to her.
Click to expand...
One of the things she was complaining about was that when she rang the British police when Madeleine McCann went missing (because she had lived at Pria de Luge ('scuse spelling) and she left because the place Felt Evil and she could Tell Them Things) they refused to listen to her.

I said to Mr Mice - that's probably because she sounds unhinged. I sympathise with her when she is angry about her daughter being attacked online - that's awful for the poor girl - but I really think she' sounds cracked sometimes.
 
Last edited:
GeorgiePup said:
Here’s the article:

www.nickiswift.com

Why We Rarely See Kate Middleton's Son Prince Louis In Public - Nicki Swift

While Prince Louis is one of the most entertaining royals to watch, Kate Middleton has a good reason for limiting her youngest child's public appearances.
www.nickiswift.com www.nickiswift.com

In the video you referenced he was pretty disrespectful to his mother. Hopefully his behaviour is better nowadays.
Click to expand...

There Is that but, a 4year old sitting for that amount of time says more about a bored,tired young child and 4 year olds do not understand disrespect!

At least we see him warts and all unlike the invisibles.
 
GeorgiePup said:
Here’s the article:

www.nickiswift.com

Why We Rarely See Kate Middleton's Son Prince Louis In Public - Nicki Swift

While Prince Louis is one of the most entertaining royals to watch, Kate Middleton has a good reason for limiting her youngest child's public appearances.
www.nickiswift.com www.nickiswift.com

In the video you referenced he was pretty disrespectful to his mother. Hopefully his behaviour is better nowadays.
Click to expand...
I suspect that they don't want to risk raising another Hazno. He'll be appropriately disciplined, and that may mean missing occasions that he would love to attend.
 
TheMiceInTheShed said:
I suspect that they don't want to risk raising another Hazno. He'll be appropriately disciplined, and that may mean missing occasions that he would love to attend.
Click to expand...

As i said above, he was just 4 years old and some people may have perfect kids but mine would have been as naughty and tbh little shits at this age.

10 minutes is an age for a child his age.
 
GeorgiePup said:
Here’s the article:

www.nickiswift.com

Why We Rarely See Kate Middleton's Son Prince Louis In Public - Nicki Swift

While Prince Louis is one of the most entertaining royals to watch, Kate Middleton has a good reason for limiting her youngest child's public appearances.
www.nickiswift.com www.nickiswift.com

In the video you referenced he was pretty disrespectful to his mother. Hopefully his behaviour is better nowadays.
Click to expand...


Good grief - he was a small child, just turned 4, who was at a concert that went on for hours late into the evening. Most kids of that age would have struggled

don't even ask me about the terrible overseas funeral I attended with my 4 year old
 
Status
Thread locked. We start a new thread when they have over 1000 posts, click the blue button to see all threads for this topic and find the latest open thread.
Back
Top