Is this a job for a spy or something a little racier - I can't decide.
In other news that Zara article is as Moody kitten says - such bullshit
Harry & Meghan #453 Nowhere Near The Action Man.
- Thread starter Chita
- Start date
-
- Tags
- harry and meghan
- Status
1
Is this a job for a spy or something a little racier - I can't decide.
In other news that Zara article is as Moody kitten says - such bullshit
Cinnamon.girl
VIP Member
Don't they talk a lot of rubbish, not even a pretence of keeping to the facts or what they told us last week.
GB News, GordonBunn Fruitcake
"A source has claimed the Sussexes might not be joining the rest of the Royal Family at Balmoral"
"King Charles will miss out on seeing his grandchildren Archie and Lilibet amid tension with Prince Harry.
"The Firm will be making their way to Scotland next month for their royal summer holiday, to spend family time together in the Highlands."
"There had been some rumours that Prince Harry and Meghan Markle could join them, and bring their children along too to help build a bond with Harry's family.
"However, a source close to the Sussexes told The Daily Express that it is unlikely, despite the fact the King wants to build a relationship with Archie and Lilibet."
....................
I love "The Firm will be making their way to Scotland", like wildebeest over the Masai Mara treading their ancestral paths.
The Firm will travel by private jet or helicopter. I'd be surprised if the Waleses went.
We were told the Stoats had not been given an invitation anyway. Snubbed.
If they weren't going in the first place, how can they now "not be joining TRF?"
We're told the Ho won't set foot in the UK because of security fears - especially around Balmoral.
On no account can the Stoat and his father afford a thaw in relations which would remove the excuses preventing the Flatpacks from visiting.
So, keep up the "tension".
As with Thomas Markle, falsehoods have been peddled to maintain the distance, falsehoods now accepted more or less as the truth thanks to scoundrels.
Chuck is safe in pretending to be heartbroken at lack of contact with the Flatpacks, and comforts himself with zoom calls to see how they're getting on. We're regularly reminded that he misses them, and that they'll grow up missing out on their true family.
Why is a mainstream broadcaster peddling these lies?
Load of gaslighting nonsense to disorientate us and hide the truth as long as they can.
GB News, Gordon
"A source has claimed the Sussexes might not be joining the rest of the Royal Family at Balmoral"
"King Charles will miss out on seeing his grandchildren Archie and Lilibet amid tension with Prince Harry.
"The Firm will be making their way to Scotland next month for their royal summer holiday, to spend family time together in the Highlands."
"There had been some rumours that Prince Harry and Meghan Markle could join them, and bring their children along too to help build a bond with Harry's family.
"However, a source close to the Sussexes told The Daily Express that it is unlikely, despite the fact the King wants to build a relationship with Archie and Lilibet."
....................
I love "The Firm will be making their way to Scotland", like wildebeest over the Masai Mara treading their ancestral paths.
The Firm will travel by private jet or helicopter. I'd be surprised if the Waleses went.
We were told the Stoats had not been given an invitation anyway. Snubbed.
If they weren't going in the first place, how can they now "not be joining TRF?"
We're told the Ho won't set foot in the UK because of security fears - especially around Balmoral.
On no account can the Stoat and his father afford a thaw in relations which would remove the excuses preventing the Flatpacks from visiting.
So, keep up the "tension".
As with Thomas Markle, falsehoods have been peddled to maintain the distance, falsehoods now accepted more or less as the truth thanks to scoundrels.
Chuck is safe in pretending to be heartbroken at lack of contact with the Flatpacks, and comforts himself with zoom calls to see how they're getting on. We're regularly reminded that he misses them, and that they'll grow up missing out on their true family.
Why is a mainstream broadcaster peddling these lies?
Load of gaslighting nonsense to disorientate us and hide the truth as long as they can.
Churchill's Ghost
VIP Member
Or she wants to rebrand as American Royal Orchard. There are no depths to their cuntishness.
It's already been put out that they cannot use those names...if they do, then could KC3 put their titles in abeyance? Or maybe just put Sussex in abeyance and and make them use Dumbarton?
D. A.
VIP Member
I just came to post this - I figured Sussex Royal too!
Although my opinion on the chat with KC differs; I think it's PR bullshit, I mean when does she ever ask?
Elainne
Chatty Member
It's strange how he was allowed to have Diana buried at Althorpe, he wouldn't give her sanctuary when she asked him for it.
You would think that the future monarchs mother would have been buried somewhere more accessible to avoid exactly this type of situation occurring, if it is true.
wibble
VIP Member
I really don't see how American Royal Orchard is any better.
---
The only reason for Sussex Royal is that the instagram may have more followers.I just came to post this - I figured Sussex Royal too!
Although my opinion on the chat with KC differs; I think it's PR bullshit, I mean when does she ever ask?
mammaof3
VIP Member
Allegedly he did offer her a house but it wasn't suitable.
He took the papers and then his own lawyers to court because of this.
Why Princess Diana's post-divorce request was rejected by her brother Earl Spencer
The late Princess of Wales divorced in 1996
www.hellomagazine.com
Her brother, Earl Charles Spencer, offered Diana a place to stay at their childhood home of Althorp, but it turns out he had the hard job of rejecting her request when it came to living arrangements.
He explained: "Diana had a lovely dream that she could live a normal life afterward. But the one house that she set her heart on in the park [at the family home of Althorp] was three bedrooms and 100 yards from the road. And it was just not possible. The police knew it wouldn’t work. I offered every other property that was suitable on the estate. I really felt it was the right decision for her. But she probably couldn’t see it."
Princess Diana’s brother 'refused to let her stay with him after Charles split'
Earl Spencer, 54, is also said to have been a 'useless husband,' according to papers published in the High Court
This includes one in which he refused to let Diana stay at Althorp House in Northamptonshire, the family estate, following her divorce.
The father-of-seven issued a writ against his former lawyers Schillings, saying they messed up part of a libel action he brought against a newspaper a decade ago.
Cinnamon.girl
VIP Member
Thanks @LadyMuck
BookWorm said that what Harald and Moehringer edited out of Spare was enough for a second book. After the Porker interview he said that the material on the cutting-room floor was enough for another interview. True or not, these veiled threats are a form of blackmail.
What is Harald trying to hide by pretending to have destroyed correspondence with Moehringer? BookWorm didn't think it concerned protecting Chelsy or the Ho, it's deflection as Harald wouldn't have written about Chelsy, and the Ho had a lot of input especially towards the end where you can hear her voice.
So what's the hidden evidence? Bookworm thinks it was material that the lawyers thought it could have had legal repercussions for Harald, mention that the Palace had tried to reach a secret agreement with the media which prevented him from acting until 2019. He was a victim, had no say and no part in the negotiations.
Harald's phone was hacked 15 times between 2003 and 2009. Catherine's 155 times. Harald is trying to hide the fact that he knew about the Palace secret deal with the media, and his excuse that he was only told a year later is rubbish. In a convoluted way he admitted to Moehringer that he knew about it.
The secret agreement with the press was that William and Harald wouldn't take action if there was an apology. There wasn't one, so the brothers brought claims through a mutual lawyer. However in 2019 Harald filed a separate lawsuit through his own lawyer. Bookworm thinks this was the Ho's doing as she wanted money, and this is why this is going on now. William reached a settlement and donated over $1 million to IG.
How can Harald say he knew nothing? It's on record that his father wrote to him on this subject. The case in January will be frivolous. There may well be other salacious bits edited out not related to hacking, which the Royal Family don't want to be revealed.
Sami Lee
VIP Member
Receptionist? Yep! Definitely a gateway job to something a tad more exciting... especially if you have spelling and Cluedo skills. After all, didn't Miss Moneypenny start off as a tea girl? (Though I suspect this is Classified information still....)
Is this a job for a spy or something a little racier - I can't decide.
In other news that Zara article is as Moody kitten says - such bullshit
BTW, what's next door to MI6....the MI5 crew by any chance...?
(Do I get the job...?
)
Cinnamon.girl
VIP Member
If you Google Sussex.royal.com it still comes up with RF links to "Community, Monarchy and the Commonwealth." I thought that they'd been barred from using this Royal name, but it's been there since 2020. Does this mean TRF didn't grab it so they couldn't use it? It seems to be running parallel with Sussex.com. It's not right that they should be flogging products through any RF links, as it's against the rules.
I'd employ you! I thought it was a cover for MI5 too.Receptionist? Yep! Definitely a gateway job to something a tad more exciting... especially if you have spelling and Cluedo skills. After all, didn't Miss Moneypenny start off as a tea girl? (Though I suspect this is Classified information still....)
BTW, what's next door to MI6....the MI5 crew by any chance...?
(Do I get the job...?
I have to be careful because as a student in the 70's I went for a job as a waitress in a Gentleman's club in St, James's and I had visions of Bertie Wooster and Noel Coward and the Drones and a black uniform with a little cap and apron. I have to admit it looked like a Gentleman's Club too. It wasn't, however (and I didn't return after the interview which I feel I must make clear)
Amiyaya
VIP Member
This keeps bugging me and I have said this right from the early threads but I am convinced there is something physically wrong with Rachel. Be it EDS, hyper mobility, something - her body doesn’t move well. This photo also suggests to me that there may be something underlying.
If this is the case she should hang her head in shame - imagine the positive PR such as the York girls with scoliosis and dyslexia; that she could have brought.
If this is the case she should hang her head in shame - imagine the positive PR such as the York girls with scoliosis and dyslexia; that she could have brought.
Attachments
What could go wrong?
Chatty Member
I just knew those oh-so-desirable bandanas and pencil toppers hadn't been consigned.
Hands up for a perky Sussex Royal tee
Palpatine
VIP Member
Receptionist? Yep! Definitely a gateway job to something a tad more exciting... especially if you have spelling and Cluedo skills. After all, didn't Miss Moneypenny start off as a tea girl? (Though I suspect this is Classified information still....)
BTW, what's next door to MI6....the MI5 crew by any chance...?
(Do I get the job...?
Thames House is on Millbank on the other side of the river. It’s more likely that the job is at the offices of the London Philharmonic Orchestra which is right next door to MI6.
wibble
VIP Member
I don't think so.
She just has a short attention span, which in turn means she is never still - thus you get all the weird ticks and body shapes.
- Status