Harry & Meghan #437 When life gives you lemons, make overpriced strawberry jam

Status
Thread locked. We start a new thread when they have over 1000 posts, click the blue button to see all threads for this topic and find the latest open thread.
1
Last edited:
Who is Barker.
Interesting comments also. Not sure what it means though.



View attachment 2895600 q

someone on Reddit called them "the Italian Neil Sean": they seem to be always barking up the wrong tree.

speaking of SMM and the Gerardo Rivera Jam, also found and nicked this funny:

Screenshot 2024-04-25 at 06.10.59.png
 
Last edited:
Back to ripping off Catherine's courgette chutney...

And in what sense is that vomit bolognese?


Courgette chutney? The one she gifted to HMTLQ? Had no idea it was made with courgette!

It would be a nightmare for so many people 😂 I don't understand why, but it's a whole thing to hate summer veggies, especially all the squashes/gourds 🙄


I would be shocked if Smegs ever managed to make a decent mint-coriander chutney (which doesn't even require any cooking) 🙄
 
Nothing will ever convince me otherwise that KC isn't funding the house(s) and basic security for them. Let's be honest, the Duchy of Lancaster is a bottomless pot of money - valued at £652 million in 2022. A couple of million to Harry yearly is barely going to be missed.
https://www.12ft.io/https://www.the...king-charles-queen-duchies-cornwall-lancaster
I agree, plus everything @Cinnanon.girl says. Just my Kiwi Colonial thoughts about the King: yes, he has a sense of humour, yes he's OK chatting to ordinary people, and (more important!) he likes dogs and they like him! But I can't move on from his murky past, the Saudi cash deals, that gun-dealing with Kashoggi? "Well, if I hadn't done it, someone else would have", (I was sure i remembered this incident from my youth - but can't find any online reference, so dunno?) his VILE PEDALO PALS. Nuff said.
 
Tbf Catherine looks annoyed too. Bet that woman was trying to talk while they were watching the tennis.

I think she was pissed off that the lady ignored her and appeared to be talking to Catherine. Probably a comment about the tennis which the ho has zero knowledge about. She absolutely loathes not being centre of attention it's hilarious to watch.
I think she's the wife of the Wimbledon Chairman, so will be extremely knowledgeable about tennis.
---
Who is Barker.
Interesting comments also. Not sure what it means though.



View attachment 2895600 q

Barker is the 'Bark' half of Bark Jack.
 
BIB - I think that that is one of the things that makes Hazno what he is. For years he had people behind the scenes doing all the work and giving him cues so he would show up, being a handsome and beloved young man (and leveraging on the collective memory of a boy behind his Mother's coffin) say some jokes, being cheeky and he was a success. Today, he is nearly 40, he has lost his looks, he has lost everyone's sympathy by making his own family lives a living hell, disrespecting his very old grandparents, insulting his brother and sister in law, acting like an entitled brat and he has no one, NO ONE, with a brain behind him leading him on anything in life. So he is a man-child, unprepared and entitled, throwing tantrums via courts and lawyers and speaking gibberish, hypocrisy at public events.
Well... that's being Royal, innit...
 
Here's a thing...

So we know Harry is security conscious, and paranoid, and would do anything to protect his family etc...

So...
... welcome to the Companies House blog on GOV.UK...
And here is the rules for company directors....

"As a director of a company, you need to supply 2 addresses, one where we can send correspondence (a correspondence address) and the second, your home address (or usual residential address).

Your correspondence address appears on the public register, for all to see. Your usual residential address is kept on a private register that’s only available to certain public authorities such as the police.

If you’ve given the same address for both purposes then your private, home address will appear on the public register.
"

That all seems straight forward...
But suppose I don't want my residential address on this private register?

"If you do not want your home address to be available on the register, you have a few options."

Tell me more...

"You can simply supply a different address, this could be:
your accountant
business adviser
your registered office address

You must have permission to use the address, and the company must be contactable at the address given. Alternatively, there are many companies who will provide you with a director correspondence address for a fee."

So...

If you don't want the world to know where you live, it seems there are plenty of options and it seems reasonably easy for the information not to be available to potential tomato chuckers.

The Travelyst registered office address is...
" C/O Cms Cameron Mckenna Nabarro Olswang Llp Cannon Place, 78 Cannon Street, London... etc"

The correspondence address for Harry, as 'a person of significant control' within the Travelyst company is...
"Cannon Place, 78 Cannon Street, London... etc"
Which is presumably the offices of CMS et al Llp...

So how come it's in the papers, apparently gleaned from Travelyst info at Companies House, that he is living in Montecito?
Unless someone wanted it to be...
His details on the change of address form states New Country/State Usually Resident: United States:

https://s3.eu-west-2.amazonaws.com/document-api-images-live.ch.gov.uk/docs/rBOvNIAjoQDw4BJ00_wvZz2dnk8UgNejsIIjEIht5QE/application-pdf?X-Amz-Algorithm=AWS4-HMAC-SHA256&X-Amz-Credential=ASIAWRGBDBV3MF2HU67S%2F20240425%2Feu-west-2%2Fs3%2Faws4_request&X-Amz-Date=20240425T055820Z&X-Amz-Expires=60&X-Amz-Security-Token=IQoJb3JpZ2luX2VjEFAaCWV1LXdlc3QtMiJHMEUCIQDeD1ITYBYnf6aiGACJvTsMjDyKgu7JySHurRmKQH63PwIgA3C4UexjujvZ5Bo%2FjKvqXwYlmSMqaVFaJxwM8OEHg6QqxAUImf%2F%2F%2F%2F%2F%2F%2F%2F%2F%2FARAFGgw0NDkyMjkwMzI4MjIiDPj1E8n4Zvv%2FqIGd9yqYBVuwe6dS%2BEa8f1Ex1fWmFLr2qaY1ynh%2FCvee4rZgM2IvD436Hlv6j0R7RG3r%2FZgtZwUr3V24HRsfXZMlQUr7rJK%2FcroQcuiZTFq4MTB3tL9LWJsqU23b0J51TPfBypZFmoAw%2FwHp84w8lCqkfWSyxuPT0lKB5L3P8ZODFXVlHJP0yOoz2jSCU%2FaNGyTWUKeplgt2osOxTRLAirNqH6ziL7YYnOlaCZwRzng5syWqGtIwPRh9FfEVb2uda01DMFE02LYusNjSU%2FzWR2xSAwpiyD%2BWPAjWUfw7VUuDEmZSkoMiVbwNlcsEQxinj4S8pc1V0tCWSJ5cxlCmuBhPQNNEGzsLFkQeiOS8lXQVNVP9hM7WmQnjuLQcTgfnHJGUzKYIfSKLbi4fsydHldLXHsoBarD%2FhNOy%2FLT2mMsPC%2BFFPyErdioiENruIQUv93beRPklhAy1wX3QWWYgOUJ7swCkGfAJW7dBQ2J6I4CuSFwqt5ROXuLqIZC5Xct7hXfNiSGGRWpj6WuLVs0WAaJGPXXlbKRQGRA3FliDMmdaejEbRbhB8S5jxiHPY8LvqmCCF9kIKkLCz5IwsH2UGqj62F2ZJ7COCy5aG%2Bvl5PZaVdYNeuV2ZS7RGRr0p%2FobTPOoQ%2FFRd8RJVFWSdYIdAJvgKO0QiANbEs5F91lP3XsVN%2FR0ygAaq5%2FnSswEncQcOhywXGRlpSMhbHjkHFvbxVh22KF7H2gEtYBKmuluwpBp8kuWaUN66oZfVRpQub2uA2ej7JzZuFApeBmf4WyPrVNWmvfMbp7Ll7M%2FZwCvHYPAoGhehYaU1kngZlSYf7auzxy5BEOFrXifzgvOUkAXw6AmHix8ngruMf%2BTCUFGjQc%2Fw8ADwB6PCoxDNj%2FiFiAw1bmmsQY6sQF5P%2FNIdwNMKt%2FYxddXW8CE0gHKl2FAoBlpy0hH4FaMJUWPmz3X%2Fre33BxAdaKMJSHrmnFoJ%2FWQDvmb%2Ba%2FoyvupZqN7HArPFPEjTLVRwr6QP50LhuKWYVGaR1C21YYLedkFL%2FxniulJNDIunjoNGuB5X6XzcDAKcj61P5wcpEhcFIkG56vkT16VFzleDA6oKRAHYODQfi8eELC06FCk6GVvFyRK9bO3AN2IoNkbvmGM7sA%3D&X-Amz-SignedHeaders=host&response-content-disposition=inline%3Bfilename%3D%2212546940_psc04_2024-04-17.pdf%22&X-Amz-Signature=090ab2dec39e7eac7c63e63a39060035d6c92035b53772c4bbd9f2e9de419162
 
As a woman, I completely understand and agree with the annoyance you feel.
Except to say that headliner women who achieve great power do occlude the fact that sexism is thriving lower down the hierarchy and that government actively participates in it, when not turning a blind eye.
We women down here are still not treated with equality.

My annoyance with, as you say, "The whole feminist and womens Empowerment crap" is because whatever grassroots women's movement there was was hijacked a long time ago by radical leftists, radical feminists, radical lesbians - the neo-Marxist forerunners of wokeism and DEI - entirely for their own ends. Just like women like Markle and many others today use this 'Women's Empowerment crap' to further their own careers.
Did you know that these 'feminist' women never, ever factored mothers into their ideologies and campaign structures? We were simply personae non grata, no use to the cause. If they had then e.g. mothers in the US would have decent maternity leave now. Women in the UK would receive far better medical care.

Guess who IS getting mothers' needs on the official agenda, factored into mainstream policy and strategy? And has been working away quietly on this for the past decade?
Princess Catherine.
---
I am woman who had very strong women role models in my family. To me what really makes the whole thing a joke is the silence from these women who spout about womens empowerment when it comes to the lack of women’s empowerment or any form of equality when it comes to women in Islamic countries such Afghanistan. you notice they never talk about that
 
Status
Thread locked. We start a new thread when they have over 1000 posts, click the blue button to see all threads for this topic and find the latest open thread.
Back
Top