Harry & Meghan #421 You're so Unfair! I lied in Spare!

Status
Thread locked. We start a new thread when they have over 1000 posts, click the blue button to see all threads for this topic and find the latest open thread.
1
Wasn’t this a judicial review, so the outcome will be deciding on if there are any issues with the policy / process that determined Harry wouldn’t get the security he wants?

So even if Harry ‘wins’, the government will just have to change their policy/process and follow that again to make their decision about Harry’s security. He still may end up with none.

So what I mean is, Harry doesn’t automatically get the funded security he wants even if he ‘wins’ tomorrow.
 
The official notice
 

Attachments

  • Screenshot_20240227_192329_YouTube.jpg
    Screenshot_20240227_192329_YouTube.jpg
    38.5 KB · Views: 21
  • Screenshot_20240227_192337_YouTube.jpg
    Screenshot_20240227_192337_YouTube.jpg
    39.1 KB · Views: 21
Cinnamon.girl said:
There was a hearing in camera in December to see if he could challenge the HO decision, ruling on this tomorrow.

On Wednesday it seems that Harald " is due to learn whether he has won a High Court challenge against the Government over a decision to change the level of his personal security when visiting the UK."
Click to expand...
So many moons ago I worked on judicial reviews. From memory what will happen is this:
The judge will rule if the civil servants who made this decision followed due process. If they didn’t; the judge will rule that the decision has to be reviewed. This judgement will not state if Harry gets what he wants but rather the decision just needs to be examined.
I can guarantee that if the decision is to be reviewed there will be some very peeved civil servants who will make damn sure that the decision remains the same lol
 
wisebutwild said:
Can you imagine if this memorial service had taken place during the 26 hours Hazno was over here ‘seeing’ his father. He would have been over at Windsor like a shot declaring he was standing in for Wills and he would have wanted to be top dog walking at the front of the RF. Remember when he was walking behind PP’s coffin and moved from his designated position so he could be better seen by all the cameras. I think it was Peter Phillips place he pinched which was the designated place for the eldest grandchild.

What is it with the spares always wanting to be the centre of attention, Andrew?

Many thanks @Chita for starting this new thread and recap and thanks to @SkiesOfBlue for the great title.
Click to expand...

Oh Hazno would love to have attended - pretty sure he was not invited though. Not only Prince Pavlos - King Constantine eldest son - is married to one of the world's most prominent socialites, Chantal Miller, but one of his grandsons is married to the daughter of Thomas Fiohr, a billionaire owner of VistaJet an aviation company for the very rich to rent a private jet to travel. I am sure Hazno and his wife would love to have a "partnership" with the Fiohrs.

Also, bare in mind that when I say Chantal Miller is a top socialite, she has nothing to do with Kardashians and Oprahs. She is a billionaire daughter, who went to school/befriended people from the wealthiest, oldest families from all over the world. She was even bitchy - and I supported her - to Queen Letizia when she was plain rude with Queen Sofia some years ago. This is old money for real (kind of, her father was new money but he really made his daughters the epitome of society these days) and the kind of group where the ILBW will never, ever have a place. And I bet she would love to.
 
penpitstop said:
So many moons ago I worked on judicial reviews. From memory what will happen is this:
The judge will rule if the civil servants who made this decision followed due process. If they didn’t; the judge will rule that the decision has to be reviewed. This judgement will not state if Harry gets what he wants but rather the decision just needs to be examined.
I can guarantee that if the decision is to be reviewed there will be some very peeved civil servants who will make damn sure that the decision remains the same lol
Click to expand...

You explained this much better than me 😂

in some ways it would be quite funny for harry to think he’s won tomorrow and then in a few months get told no again 😂
 
Why is Invictus even having a church event in London?

To compete with the Princess of Wales' Christmas Carols?

Also, there is a very clear agenda against and I am truly aghast as to why Camilla would do this. You can't convince me that it isn't her.


1709063681576.png



Infering that Prince Harry was caught smoking, but Prince William did too.

Maybe he did, but if he wasn't caught why even infer it that way?


1709063731110.png



I suggest not to buy this book. It's clearly, Charles and Camilla propaganda dressed as a Prince William book. Just like Jobson's book.

1709063973729.png
 
Tofino said:
You explained this much better than me 😂

in some ways it would be quite funny for harry to think he’s won tomorrow and then in a few months get told no again 😂
Click to expand...
No your explanation was perfect-I hadn’t read yours before I posted or I wouldn’t have bothered!!!

he will be told no again, it’s such a massive waste of time and money, the home office will not want the embarrassment of having to say the wrong decision was made first time round
 
I didn't know what to make of this below post by @Hitch11 from P. 51 last thread, on Lady C.
I've not seen this posted by @mardymare ? Has anyone?

"I saw Lady C live on Sunday night. Couple of pearlers:

1) There is 'a photo which proves they have played the system'. The press have it, and it's coming in the Spring.
2) The children "exist" (as she often uses this word, emphasised) - she has checked with the Palace. M creates all the mystery as she is a completely boring non-entity, and it's all done to make the world think she is more interesting than she is. The mystery surrounding the children is not needed on this level, but, "on another level it is required"...

Both statements were followed with "it's in the book!". She has a book out in April. I think it may be Meghan and Harry - The Real Story (updated)

I wonder if the photo is of her putting on her moonbump?!"
...................
Points from @Hitch11 's post:

▪The Sussexes have "played the system".
Not true, there's no "system" to play and no precedent for this lunacy.
▪Photographic proof in Spring from the press, held back for 5 years?
Unlikely / impossible.
▪The children exist, confirmed by the Palace.
Of course. They're not going to say they're fake are they.
▪The Ho did all this to create mystery as she's so boring.
Not buying it. In no way does fear of being thought boring justify this huge effort by BP and the Sussexes.
The Ho has an ego the size of Everest, and this alone suggests that what Lady C says here is nonsense.
▪The mystery surrounding the children is not needed on this level, but is required on another level.
Very true.
▪Lady C is writing a book maybe called "Meghan and Harry - The Real Story".
She has a book to sell. In spring, when she says the Big Reveal will be. Coincidence?
................
I wonder if Lady C and her book are going to be used by TPTB to gently bring us The Big Reveal? She hints at it more than anyone else, is spaniel-friendly and is a known face everywhere and on here, the forum dedicated to defending our Monarchy. Wears pearls, looks like a friend but I suspect isn't, and would do favours to stay in favour imo. Might be a good choice.

From what @Hitch11 says, the above points he or she made she could possibly suggest the way the Palace and the Stoats are going with this. Anodyne, bland, boring, a biracial actress desperate to appear interesting. The RF kindly obliged......nothing to see here, here are the legal birth certificates....all kosher... move on.
Only possibly, just speculation.
Or @Hitch11 's post is invented.
In which case, apologies.
 
Last edited:
TheCutiePatootie said:
Why is Invictus even having a church event in London?

To compete with the Princess of Wales' Christmas Carols?

Also, there is a very clear agenda against and I am truly aghast as to why Camilla would do this. You can't convince me that it isn't her.


View attachment 2784027 q


Infering that Prince Harry was caught smoking, but Prince William did too.

Maybe he did, but if he wasn't caught why even infer it that way?


View attachment 2784028 q


I suggest not to buy this book. It's clearly, Charles and Camilla propaganda dressed as a Prince William book. Just like Jobson's book.

View attachment 2784034 q
Click to expand...

Yeah, Harold seems just the straightforward, let's get this sorted type...




...not :rolleyes: 🤣
 
Status
Thread locked. We start a new thread when they have over 1000 posts, click the blue button to see all threads for this topic and find the latest open thread.
Back
Top