Harry & Meghan #421 You're so Unfair! I lied in Spare!

Status
Thread locked. We start a new thread when they have over 1000 posts, click the blue button to see all threads for this topic and find the latest open thread.
1
Sami Lee said:
.


I can't find the words to describe just how deeply disgusted and exhausted I am by this deluded trollop's brazen, shameless, interminable efforts to make herself vaguely interesting by exploiting her tenuous connections to the United Kingdom's RF.

Shame on Harold Shithead for dragging this pustulent pestilence to our shores.
Click to expand...

@Sami Lee

I love your articulate wording and you sound just like Maggie Smith!

You really are a class act, you should enter Parliament😁😁😁 I can come with you and give them my Tootingite gob, we could clear up between us😂😂😂
 
LadyMuck said:
Sick of all the royal reporters on tv this morning saying H should get his security as although it was his choice to leave, it wasn't his choice to be born into the RF.

They're saying 'we all know smegz has received many far right threats'.

Show us the evidence then! H just wants the Intel more than security imo
Click to expand...

:mad:

You could say that about pretty much any titled member of the RF then, couldn't you? Would these idiots like the taxpayer to cough up for security for all of them?

What about Andrew? Seeing as that's a phrase they're rather fond of uttering when it suits them.

Should he get his security back? If Hazbeen's so eligible, why wouldn't Andrew be? Second son of Monarch. Active service. CoS.

Should Anne, the Edinburghs and the Gloucesters get full-time protection? They are full-time working Royals after all. And the Duke of Gloucester definitely didn't choose to be. He had a good career and gave that up to step forward and do his duty when his brother died.

Absolutely sick to the teeth of them all thinking Hazza is somehow unique, more special, more important and more deserving of superior treatment. No wonder his ego's the size it is.
 
Last edited:
Happy Lady said:
Why do people get their knickers in a twist. They were attending a memorial, you know a sad service of remembering and celebrating the life of someone. Lots of people shed a tear so I wish people would stop being so stupid making stuff up to suit their own agenda.

Let me tell you my take on it. If Charles was really badly, there's no chance in hell that Camilla wouldn't have been by his side. Camilla didn't have to go to the service, as Anne attended.

Now let me talk about Andrew. This was a family affair and the family had invited him and Sarah to attend. So they went. The truth is he mixed with JE, but we know nothing else. The truth is Charles mixed with Saville, but he doesn't get the flack that's thrown Andrew's way. He never went to court, he was never found guilty of anything.
Click to expand...
Still catching up but wanted to add......

And Andrew is NOT a paedophile. She was over the age of consent in this country, which, allegedly, is where the deed took place. He's a creep but not a pweirdo, I wish people would stop referring to him as one.
 
Judicial review decision expected today about Harrys security i.e. did the Home Office/Ravec in deciding that “effective” security was sufficient for H&M make their decision in a lawful manner? It is at a ridiculous stage now where even if the Judge rules in Harrys favour then decisions about his security gets kicked back to the Home Office/Ravec (the ones who decide on Royal security and who have already made it clear he won't be getting tax payer funded security) who will then go about making the exact same decision which was to give effective security but do so in a lawful way after a judicial review.
 
jonathanlynch said:
Judicial review decision expected today about Harrys security i.e. did the Home Office/Ravec in deciding that “effective” security was sufficient for H&M make their decision in a lawful manner? It is at a ridiculous stage now where even if the Judge rules in Harrys favour then decisions about his security gets kicked back to the Home Office/Ravec (the ones who decide on Royal security and who have already made it clear he won't be getting tax payer funded security) who will then go about making the exact same decision which was to give effective security but do so in a lawful way after a judicial review.
Click to expand...

A waste of everybody’s time and money just to satisfy a trumped up little gob shite who can’t take NO for an answer. I wish Charles or Di had given him a good slap round his ear hole when he was a kid ( you were allowed to do it in those days without fear of being prosecuted) when he wouldn’t accept NO for an answer then we wouldn’t have had to put up with all his childish tantrums now!
 
Screenshot_20240228-103117_kindlephoto-7823207.png
 
Dooley Doo said:
This is turning into an awful year.
I am starting to worry that the gruesomes are going to get what they want.

I wish there was some investigation into who is backing them.
Click to expand...
Do you mean half in half out or Do you mean William giving up the throne Dooley ?
Half in half out yes l can see that happening but William giving up the throne? Surely George would just be next in line ?
If either things happened l can see us becoming a republic in time , depending upon George .
---
ChipDex said:
This is who should be the face of Invictus.

Strong, positive and without an ounce of self pity.

View attachment 2784935 q
Click to expand...
Now that IS a hero
 
Status
Thread locked. We start a new thread when they have over 1000 posts, click the blue button to see all threads for this topic and find the latest open thread.
Back
Top