Harry and Meghan #75 Hostage Haz out for show, blink once for yes and twice for no

Status
Thread locked. We start a new thread when they have over 1000 posts, click the blue button to see all threads for this topic and find the latest open thread.
1
I'm not a robot said:
It is only the grandchildren that are technically owned by the Monarch, so this won't apply until Charles is King. I feel that the monarchy would not want to be seen to remove the children from their mother (unless she is certifiably insane?) so will probably have 50/50 custody similar to how Prince Charles and Diana had with William and Harry. If Harry ever manages to escape her clutches, those poor children better get used to International flying,
Click to expand...
Maybe I’m really reaching here but is it a huge stretch that Meghan would give them up? She just doesn’t seem maternal in the slightest, and it would allow her to continue her LA lifestyle. She doesn’t have a problem with dropping other previously beloved family members such as her father. I know your kids are different though of course and maybe I’m being unfair saying that. Just a thought anyway.
 
There are so many inconsistencies.
But apart from all the lies can we take a moment to give thanks to the seagull who shat on her shoulder 😂
 

Attachments

  • Screenshot_20210313_173243.jpg
    Screenshot_20210313_173243.jpg
    37.6 KB · Views: 76
Inforapenny said:
Isn't it called 'love bombing' ...that's what she did.
I used to date a guy, the relationship was abusive and after a while I realised he was abusing me. I was mentally and emotionally vulnerable when we met, he must've thought he'd hit the jack pot.
I went down the rabbit hole of narcissists and psychopaths and he fitted the checklist textbook. It was crazy. It left me broken after 14 months. Looking back it was scary and creepy and caused me PTSD. In the end he became violent and the police had to protect me. This man left me suicidal, and this will happen to Harry. I guarantee.
If Harry was to harm himself this would be the PERFECT excuse for Meghan to be the victim once again, whilst all the time enabling Harry to be unwell and not get help.
Meghan is most definitely a narcissist and a sociopath (not a psychopath).
I know how Harry is feeling.
Although I dislike him and he's stupid he's a human and he's being abused.
When it does come out I wonder what Oprah, Beyonce and Serena will then say.
Click to expand...
I'm sorry that you experienced this. I can relate and it is utterly debilitating and frankly cruel.
Oprah, Bey and Serena will turn it to be MM as the victim. REmember -- she "loves rescuing"

Bastille said:
The second photo cannot be real surely?
Click to expand...
she is pissed off that the truly pregnant woman in grey is more credible than her....
 
mb1202 said:
Maybe I’m really reaching here but is it a huge stretch that Meghan would give them up? She just doesn’t seem maternal in the slightest, and it would allow her to continue her LA lifestyle. She doesn’t have a problem with dropping other previously beloved family members such as her father. I know your kids are different though of course and maybe I’m being unfair saying that. Just a thought anyway.
Click to expand...
That would include giving up HUGE maintenance payments and control. I can't see it.
 
NotDumbNotBlonde said:
Thank you for your concern - I did a double take at first when I screenshotted it, but It's from Piers's Instagram, presumably of his own Amazon account, it must be his postcode.
Click to expand...

Yes, I went back and edited my post after I came to the same conclusion.
Piers, as you’ve got some spare time on your hands, you may be reading here so be careful with your postcode- there are some nutters out there! ;) 😁
 
mb1202 said:
I don’t understand her whole thing that she was snubbed when asking for mental health assistance, and that they refused it for her because she wasn’t a paid employee or something? Erm a) why is it their job, you’re a grown woman with autonomy and plenty of money b) it’s not up to them to ‘refuse’ medical assistance, you’re not a hostage although that’s what you keep making out and b) as if she actually went to a member of the family saying she was suicidal and they told her to sod off. It just doesn’t ring true at all.
Click to expand...
If her makeup artist is such a good friend, he should have helped her, no?
On a separate note, I've been thinking about the Charlie Hebdo cover - it is in such poor taste BUT perhaps that is what it is doing: putting the racism accusation into perspective: really? big bad nasty 94yr old monarch who has never set a foot wrong in her over 70 years of reign? errr.... and poor vulnderable Meghan a victim of racism.... really? really?? come on. she really cannot compare her problems to what is REAL racism.
dunno - not trying to justify it but maybe that is their poorly executed attempt at ridiculing the M&H sob story?

mb1202 said:
Maybe I’m really reaching here but is it a huge stretch that Meghan would give them up? She just doesn’t seem maternal in the slightest, and it would allow her to continue her LA lifestyle. She doesn’t have a problem with dropping other previously beloved family members such as her father. I know your kids are different though of course and maybe I’m being unfair saying that. Just a thought anyway.
Click to expand...
she will demand to keep them for maintenance/child support. Doria will be the fully paid nanny. they will be "home schooled" as well and doria will be paid for that as well. She will demand to get alimony that will keep her AND THE CHILDREN in a lifestyle to which they have become accustomed, including security and chauffeurs (she will pay herself the chauffer salary).
 
Status
Thread locked. We start a new thread when they have over 1000 posts, click the blue button to see all threads for this topic and find the latest open thread.
Back
Top