Bastille
Chatty Member
I found this from 2013 https://archive.voice-online.co.uk/article/will-prince-harry-ever-marry-black-girl
And that’s also why I find it hard to believe he’d have an affair. They are such a closed knit family and he loves them.If I was Meghan the one thing I would be completely jealous of Kate is her family. they are strong, defensive, loving and look out for her, will and the kids. They are invited into the circle and you can tell William adores them too. I bet they spend loads of time with them privately. She’s incredibly close to her sister too. When you consider her dad literally sold stories of her you can see why the Middletown’s would make her green. Ironically for most people family and the closest of friends are everything.
Imagine if this was a murder investigation, they’d be chief suspects - they can’t agree on when the conversion took place or indeed how many conversations there were.
I also suspect Harry can’t abide the fact he’s been usurped by three little kids. He himself said a few years ago once those kids grow up, so 10-15 years, he’ll be irrelevant.
Has he been body snatched -
- says to James Corden he’s never been on a bus - pictures of him on multiple buses
- says he was never on the back of a bike as a child - again multiple pictures (btw I was never on the back of a bike as a child, can I sue?)
Also in the James Corden interview royals don’t carry cash etc, still want to be royal then?
Did he say he’d never been on a bus I know he said about the bike and I’ve seen the pic but I can’t believe he’s done it twice. Does the utter idiot know the internet exists?!
Apparently estimates of her wealth have been exagerrated AND she can burn through it as witnessed by us all.I find that quite hard to believe, she was working full time on Suits for years when she met him?
America’s culture wars are an export the rest of the world doesn’t thank you for — especially we Britons, who are now saddled with a living embodiment of those wars in the figure of Meghan Markle.
By sending her our way, American culture has fired a woke missile right into the heart of the British establishment. She’s a one-woman family destroyer, only in this case, the family in question happens to form one of Europe’s most venerable and ancient institutions.
For years, Markle has had virtually no relationship with any of her own family. It seems that she wants to ensure that her husband, Prince Harry, similarly has no relations with his. She has sought to sever his blood ties through the medium of Oprah Winfrey.
During their interview, Markle showed herself to be a far better actress than her minor TV career might ever have suggested. In her two-hour special, she posed, preened, emoted and made constant unsubstantiated claims. Worst was her claim that someone in the family had asked Harry what he thought their first-born might look like. This was immediately asserted by both Meghan and Oprah to be an example of “racism.”
Was it? I very much doubt it. If one of the royals had said anything actually racist, then Markle would have used it to get another wheelbarrow of cash in another of her high-profile attempts to avoid the limelight. As it was, she relied on innuendo.
The royal question could have been — most likely was — an entirely innocent inquiry, made in what we used to call “private” (the Duchess will have to look up that word). Prince Harry is ginger-haired. It is conceivable that a family member asked whether he thought the baby would have ginger hair. Given that the baby’s mother is black, the questioner likely wondered, might the baby come out as non-pasty-white? That is the most likely human explanation.
Did the unnamed royal family member express disgust at the idea of a mixed-race baby? Of course not. Which is why all Markle offered were teary-eyed non-specifics. Later, she implied that her son wasn’t given the title “Prince” because of his race. In fact, a great-grandson of the Queen is never titled “Prince,” unless he is the son of the heir to the throne, which Archie isn’t.
But Markle in her mansion implied that she had never heard anything so racist or wicked. Ignorant as swans and as malevolent to boot, the millionaire Markle simply emoted to the billionaire Oprah about how uniquely unfortunate and bullied she is. And so the oldest institution in Britain, the monarchy, is now on the defensive, with Buckingham Palace having to release a statement expressing “concern.”
So the Queen and her 99-year-old husband, who fought the Nazis in World War II, have to watch their grandson’s nightmare of a wife try to destroy everything they have worked for through these bogus 21st-century racism accusations.
And things are getting worse. The atmosphere in Britain is toxic. Toxic like everything that Markle touches. To even say that you doubt Markle is to risk the whole stupid spirit of our age coming crashing down upon you.
One of Markle’s claims to Oprah was that she had mental health problems brought on by marrying into the royal family. Her hardships? She didn’t know she had to curtsy when meeting the Queen. She also didn’t know that the British tabloids wouldn’t fawn over her. Had she even heard of the royal family before directing herself straight at the unsuspecting Prince Harry? Of course she had. Can someone as wily as Markle not even use Google?
Still, express doubt over any of this and you risk losing everything. Piers Morgan — not generally my cup of tea — was one of the very few Brits who expressed doubt over Markle’s account. The result? Markle complained to his bosses, who promptly defenestrated Morgan’s career.
To deny that the British monarchy is racist, when it presides over one of the most diverse group of nations on Earth, the Commonwealth, is to attract the same ire.
Well, to hell with these divisive, race-baiting, self-pitying, self-advancing furies. And to hell with those who demand that we all say only one thing and look at the world through only one lens. We have the right to doubt a Duchess. You Americans do, too. Indeed, your nation was founded upon that right.
Douglas Murray is the author, most recently, of “The Madness of Crowds: Gender, Race and Identity,” now out in paperback.
People brought that up in the comments section of the article - about how she claimed she couldn't provide the evidence required in court because her phone automatically deletes things after 30 days or something? Either way, it looks like someone's lying...
Mirror poll, who do you believe about the racism, cast a vote! H&,m currently in lead
I find that quite hard to believe, she was working full time on Suits for years when she met him?
I was really upset when I realised I had lost nearly all of my old texts from an ex after a break up. I hadn't realised but my phone only keeps the last fifty or so messages received, and the older ones are gone forever. This could look like 30 days worth of messages to some.People brought that up in the comments section of the article - about how she claimed she couldn't provide the evidence required in court because her phone automatically deletes things after 30 days or something? Either way, it looks like someone's lying...
The half-baked hypocritical toerag. Just look at the three of them. Has this hit the headlines in America, yet? My god, the fallout is to be anticipated.
So why exactly would Omid Scobie have a copy of confidential KP correspondence sent by THE DUCHESS? Asking for a friendcalled Lord Justice WarbyAnyway, if this is a 'receipt' then I'm Claudia Schiffer's body double. Scobie says this:
Meghan Markle's friend Omid Scobie today quoted an email he claims the Duchess sent to Kensington Palace last year over an allegation she made Kate Middleton cry.
Mr Scobie, author of the Finding Freedom biography of the Sussexes, claims that Prince Harry was asked to cosign a statement refuting reports Prince William had 'constantly bullied' the couple ahead of their decision to step back as senior royals.
Writing in Harper's Bazaar, the author alleged Meghan then emailed a royal aide asking if Kensington Palace could 'set the record straight' about claims she made Kate Middleton cry during a children's dress fitting in 2018.
It is reported she said: 'Well, if we're just throwing any statement out there now, then perhaps KP can finally set the record straight about me [not making Kate cry]'. Her request, sent last January, was allegedly ignored.
Why would it have been ignored? Well, we know that KP refused to comment on press stories that were true, or largely true.
That doesn't make sense as she was described in the books and the name isn't an 'English Anglo Saxon name!
Some mad American woman claims 'the Royals taught us hate/racism.' I think it's a pretty wild claim, particularly on the global scale she claims, but there's lots of similarity hysterical comments. However, one of the replies is pure class. It turns the tables perfectly.
'How do you know how white people think, you're black.'