Harry and Meghan #45 Still flapping their gums and talking out their bums

Status
Thread locked. We start a new thread when they have over 1000 posts, click the blue button to see all threads for this topic and find the latest open thread.
1
LadyMuck said:
The way they are constantly liking sm to the devil incarnate is nauseating. Why dont they just use those things at the end of their hands, called fingers, and either block, delete or come off it if it's too much for their sensitive souls. And I'm not even on sm!
Click to expand...
Know what rips my knitting? Two things really.
First, SM (and of course sea faring SMBD) is what paid her bills pre trev and hazza. Hypocritical bleep.
Second, she is squawking like a demented harpy about being attacked via SM since marrying her eunoch prince, yet the real Royals have been dealing with this tit for years over and over and over. Endless battering (yes, sometimes deserved) but they know it's best ignored most of the time . They suck it up and mosey along doing their bits and bobs. Always one or more in the firing line. Kate had 9 years of it pre marriage to William, but cuntchops dismisses all that as beneath her attention because SHE has had some harsh criticism and a lot of her secrets are worming their way out.
The bleep is on a one woman campaign to try to build a dam to prevent more leaks about her, yet the stupid tart has started a war with the media through vexatious litigation ... even to the point of sueing on behalf of her one year old child because gosh almighty, that horrid unwashed public may have caught a glimpse of one chubby cheek of his. Seriously? She's Hollyweird immersed but yet the Streisand effect has passed her by. I know for sure from workmates that most of them assumed the baby images she's sueing over were of nappy changes or something similarly personal. so they were in her corner till I suggested they look for themselves. The girls were unaware of the child so they googled him. They cannot believe she's sueing over a chubby cheek image or two while having herself posted a video of him on her knee in a vest and rather full looking nappy. Sheesh. Get a grip cuntchops.:rolleyes:
 
freda19 said:
Know what rips my knitting? Two things really.
First, SM (and of course sea faring SMBD) is what paid her bills pre trev and hazza. Hypocritical bleep.
Second, she is squawking like a demented harpy about being attacked via SM since marrying her eunoch prince, yet the real Royals have been dealing with this tit for years over and over and over. Endless battering (yes, sometimes deserved) but they know it's best ignored most of the time . They suck it up and mosey along doing their bits and bobs. Always one or more in the firing line. Kate had 9 years of it pre marriage to William, but cuntchops dismisses all that as beneath her attention because SHE has had some harsh criticism and a lot of her secrets are worming their way out.
The bleep is on a one woman campaign to try to build a dam to prevent more leaks about her, yet the stupid tart has started a war with the media through vexatious litigation ... even to the point of sueing on behalf of her one year old child because gosh almighty, that horrid unwashed public may have caught a glimpse of one chubby cheek of his. Seriously? She's Hollyweird immersed but yet the Streisand effect has passed her by. I know for sure from workmates that most of them assumed the baby images she's sueing over were of nappy changes or something similarly personal. so they were in her corner till I suggested they look for themselves. The girls were unaware of the child so they googled him. They cannot believe she's sueing over a chubby cheek image or two while having herself posted a video of him on her knee in a vest and rather full looking nappy. Sheesh. Get a grip cuntchops.:rolleyes:
Click to expand...
Well said, Freda! Lots of people who were pro are now anti, and she wonders why!? She just can't help herself coming across as a bona fide tit stirring twit, self pitying, yet entitled as duck. (By the way, tattlers, second part of Henry VIII tonight on ch 5, and the similarities keep on coming! There is def a history of mental instability in th RF, skips a bit and pops up again and again through history. From the clips, the shade is there againi, like last week. Urge you to watch)
 
freda19 said:
Know what rips my knitting? Two things really.
First, SM (and of course sea faring SMBD) is what paid her bills pre trev and hazza. Hypocritical bleep.
Second, she is squawking like a demented harpy about being attacked via SM since marrying her eunoch prince, yet the real Royals have been dealing with this tit for years over and over and over. Endless battering (yes, sometimes deserved) but they know it's best ignored most of the time . They suck it up and mosey along doing their bits and bobs. Always one or more in the firing line. Kate had 9 years of it pre marriage to William, but cuntchops dismisses all that as beneath her attention because SHE has had some harsh criticism and a lot of her secrets are worming their way out.
The bleep is on a one woman campaign to try to build a dam to prevent more leaks about her, yet the stupid tart has started a war with the media through vexatious litigation ... even to the point of sueing on behalf of her one year old child because gosh almighty, that horrid unwashed public may have caught a glimpse of one chubby cheek of his. Seriously? She's Hollyweird immersed but yet the Streisand effect has passed her by. I know for sure from workmates that most of them assumed the baby images she's sueing over were of nappy changes or something similarly personal. so they were in her corner till I suggested they look for themselves. The girls were unaware of the child so they googled him. They cannot believe she's sueing over a chubby cheek image or two while having herself posted a video of him on her knee in a vest and rather full looking nappy. Sheesh. Get a grip cuntchops.:rolleyes:
Click to expand...

Dead on (nope, still not Irish😉)!

No one forced her to instagram her boobs or tiggy bog (not a typo) way back when and no one is forcing her to read the comments in the DM now. Social media is what it is and if cuntchops doesn’t like what’s being said about herself, she needs to turn off her computer and building her own damn SM platform that she can control. In the meantime, she should stop being a bleep but that’s just wishful thinking.
 
Last edited:
Red Rum just called. He’d like his tail back. 😆

79FAD5E0-9091-4DAF-9430-63EDA31429B3.jpeg
 
I agree to some extent that social media and fake news can be awful.....

In the same way that child poverty, disease ridden water, and animal cruelty is awful.....But its far too easy to say something is wrong, its a lot harder to stop or change or address it properly.....

And I did have the impression that Ms Markle had previously exploited social media and acted as an influencer with the TIg and Sussex Royal websites.....so why is she saying it is so bad now....when she has used and taken advantage of it in the past? Does she really expect anyone to be such a fool as to believe her??

And is Harribo saying that he has always been 100% truthful.....and never ever put out a fake news story? Did he advertise the fact he was on active duty in Afghanistan? or was it quietly .......hidden........until he was outed....??? Wasnt that a fake news story? That he was involved in...directly?
 
I just tried to watch a little bit of the Time 100 chat but oh my, it's so tedious and even the interviewer's voice was grating!

Just wanted to pass on a little observation - whenever it is Harry's scripted time to talk, Meghan still has to make little noises 'supposedly in agreement' with him.....but it all seems so unnecessary. I feel like she can't keep quiet for Harry to even have his 12 seconds!.....she still needs the attention to be on her. Everything about it again...seemed so affected. And the "adoring looks lof love" from Harry.................eeek.....they are scary!

I'm glad to see that they still had their coffee table books on display but this time upright.....different...makes a change I suppose!
 
Last edited:
Status
Thread locked. We start a new thread when they have over 1000 posts, click the blue button to see all threads for this topic and find the latest open thread.
Back
Top