Hahaaaaa
Hahaaaaa
xxThank you xx
Schillings have apparently spat out a statement, below. It's just taken off twitter so I can't verify it.
Scooby still hasn't surfaced, I wonder if Schillings have told him to STFU.
View attachment 259348 q
View attachment 259349 q
Brilliant news!
Some of the things scoobie claimed could of course be claimed to be poetic licence. The pissing in the bushes thing never sat right with me because they were staying in an upmarket place on that trip and nobody inexperienced and in their right mind wanders into the African bush to take a dump/piss ... so I think smeggy can easily disprove that Finding Freebies pissing story by revealing that they weren't camping and had no need to piss in the woods. Has she deliberately planted stories like that with scoobie that she could later easily refute the veracity of?Isnt the judge saying that Meghan is going to have such clear substantial evidence that she had nothing to do with Finding Freedom, and that none of the stories in there are accurate, that she will be easily able to prove that she didnt contribute to finding Freedom at all, so that the Mail wont be able to use this evidence or prove that Meghan does choose to feed positive stories to the press!
Having read the stories on here......I have a feeling it might be quite complicated for her Douchness (thanks Freda!) to prove that she had nothing at all to do with ''Finding Freedom'' So many of the stories in there are anecdotal and must have come directly from her!
And of course there is the question of why on earth Scobie isnt being prosecuted for breaking her privacy ...when everyone else is!
Theres also things like...Scobie does say in the book, he had direct access to them! in the bits at the end, where he talks about verifying his sources! And the links /association with the Andrew Morton, Diana , biography , where it did come out, after her death, that she had contributed substantially to the book. Which is an association an awful lot of people will remember!
Yes I agree, she doesn't have the necessary self-doubt and emptiness. It's everyone else that's the problem you see!I personally dont think she has BPD. I think she just wanted to make front pages (famous) at all costs and has a very strong sense of self entitlement and arrogance.
JCMH is fine..his balls are in Smegs handbag. Or round her wrist, or dangling from her ears, depending on what mood she is in.Thank you ❤ xx
Loooool x
They all got very tight trousers on xx
Can't be very comfortable
Best bit in the Fortune word salad explosion is where she claims that her pre-recorded embargoed speech to her high school Immaculate Heart was 'rough and ready and spontaneous' because it came from the heart.
(The interviewer needs to get the Order of the OTT for claiming The Duchess has been threatened by mobs and the like )
Stupid witch. If she doesn't care then why all the litigation attempting to erase criticism of her or reports of her behaviour.https://www.12ft.io/https://www.dai...focus-criticism-flattery.html#article-8786507
What bullshit!! Of course you care you self obsessed bleep.
My thoughts exactly...she really believes everyone is stupid.Stupid witch. If she doesn't care then why all the litigation attempting to erase criticism of her or reports of her behaviour.
She cares big time.
I don't think it will be a Christmas family reunion trip anyway. Daily Mail today has a story about how the Queen's Sandringham household staff are refusing to work in a bubble over the Christmas weeks. So if they're taking things as seriously as that with the staff, I can't imagine they're going to let a madam from California waltz into the house with who knows what germs and virus particles all over her.
https://www.12ft.io/https://www.dai...staff-revolt-Sandringham-Christmas-plans.html
Thank you for the laughs today, Pom. Brilliant.
Thanks for the video you linked earlier, Scotch. I thought it was a very good analysis of MM's behaviour. Many people in the comment section were also spot on, too!