Harry and Meghan #33 When Needy met Greedy

Status
Thread locked. We start a new thread when they have over 1000 posts, click the blue button to see all threads for this topic and find the latest open thread.
1
Excellent news! Roll on Wednesday
(could someone post the text of the telegraph article please?)
Harry and Meghan biography expected to be brought into Mail on Sunday privacy case
Telegraph understands that new biography 'Finding Freedom' set to be drawn into privacy action against newspaper
Hannah Furness, Royal Correspondent26 July 2020 • 8:00pm

The new biography of the Duke and Duchess of Sussex will be used as evidence against Meghan Markle in her legal claim against a tabloid newspaper for breach of her privacy, The Telegraph understands.
The Duchess is suing Associated Newspapers, the publisher of the Mail on Sunday, over its decision to publish parts of a handwritten letter she sent to her father, Thomas Markle, in August 2018, three months after her wedding.
The legal action returns to the High Court on Wednesday when the Duchess will try to keep anonymous the so-called "Five Friends" who briefed People magazine for an article in which the existence of the letter was first made public.
The Telegraph understands that the controversial new biography, "Finding Freedom", is likely to be drawn into the privacy action against the Mail on Sunday over whether the Duchess's friends, aides and public relations team spoke to the authors or acted on her behalf.
In the court case against the Mail on Sunday, Meghan has denied that she gave the green light to the "Five Friends" to speak to People magazine. But her case would be potentially undermined if the Mail on Sunday could show that the new biography was based on information provided by well-placed sources with the couple's consent.
In a statement, Prince Harry and his wife, who now live in California, have tried to distance themselves from the book.
A spokesman has insisted the couple "were not interviewed and did not contribute to 'Finding Freedom'", adding: "The book is based on the authors' own experiences as members of the royal press corps and their own independent reporting."
TELEMMGLPICT000188896211_trans_NvBQzQNjv4BqOivrFxznyCebJDmlgdQ-3tDFZjw6fEA8zxMs7expML0.jpegimwidth=480

Harry and Meghan have tried to distance themselves from the book Credit: Samir Hussein
A source close to the Sussexes said on Sunday that Meghan "was fighting the Mail on Sunday very vigorously" and "didn't even know the People magazine article was going ahead, let alone the specifics". The source said the claims in the book also "are not coming from the couple".
But royal watchers, as well as media lawyers, will be intrigued by levels of detail raised in the book, written by Omid Scobie, a British journalist said to be close to Meghan's inner circle, and American television journalist Carolyn Durand.
Among extracts published in a Sunday newspaper, the book disclosed intimate details of Meghan's final attempt to contact her father on the eve of her wedding. It reads: "Sitting in a bath later that night, FaceTiming with a friend, the bride-to-be said she had left her dad a final message, adding: 'I can't sit up all night just pressing send'."
According to The Sunday Times, the book also claims to know Meghan's "perfect pose" in a yoga position after discussing marriage with the Duke while on holiday in Africa; the expression on Archie's face when he was born; the previously undisclosed name of the couple's labrador, which has been kept a closely-guarded secret; and "sensitive conversations with members of the royal family".
Mark Stephens, a leading media lawyer and partner at Howard Kennedy solicitors, said: "I think this book is really interesting. The Mail on Sunday lawyers will look to introduce this book as similar fact evidence.
"Private briefings and curation of her reputation is going on through anonymous spokespeople and friends and the allegation with regards the People magazine article is that five of Meghan's friends – she says without her knowledge – spoke about matters that were confidential, including the letter."
The Mail on Sunday is arguing that the duchess did not expect the letter to her father to remain private, anticipated that it would be published, and that publication was in the public interest.
The newspaper is keen to point out that Mr Markle was in possession of the letter for some time before making it available to the newspaper only after he was angered by references to it in the People magazine article.
In a newspaper interview to publicise the book, Mr Scobie said when asked about the level of access, if any, that was granted to him: "The book doesn't claim to have any interviews with Harry and Meghan. And nor do we."
When then asked whether there had been an "off-the-record" discussion, he said: "You've read the book. There's no on-the-record interviews with the couple."

Asked again, he replied: "No, and I think that you can tell from the reporting, my time around the couple is enough for me to know my subjects."
Meghan Markle is suing Associated Newspapers over its decision to publish parts of a handwritten letter she sent to her father, Thomas Markle, in August 2018
 
So now it appears they were engaged 2 months before they officially became engaged. Is anything they say the truth? Like my husband says - I wouldn't believe their radio 😂
 
They never chose Windsor. Not for one second. Will and Kate have most of KP and Amner Hall. Charles has Clarence House, Highgrove, Birkhall and Llwynywermod. Prince Andrew has Royal Lodge on the Windsor estate, Sophie and Edward have Bagshott Park, Princess Anne has the Gatcombe Estate. All are massive properties worth millions. Harry and Meghan weren't offered Frogmore House, they were offered a former staff cottage. I think that was when HM sent them a clear message that they weren't the "big shots" that they felt they deserved to be and what started the whole downward spiral because Meghan realised that she was never going to waft around a palatial English estate and/or a grand London residence and entertain Hollywood royalty from there.
An appaetmebt
I wonder if Omid was one of the five friends.
Not according Meghan herself.
I bet the Daily mail are all over this book, lots more lies and embellishments. H&M clearly spoke to the authors, bet their case against the mail is totally tanked by this.

The Twitter reviews aren't kind. 😁
It reads like a Mills and Boon novel. There is nothing new in it. It must have taken a hot second to hash together.
I don't like Dan Wootton, don't like his nasal voice and smugness but he's been bang on with every scoop.
 
Harry and Meghan biography expected to be brought into Mail on Sunday privacy case
Telegraph understands that new biography 'Finding Freedom' set to be drawn into privacy action against newspaper
Hannah Furness, Royal Correspondent26 July 2020 • 8:00pm

The new biography of the Duke and Duchess of Sussex will be used as evidence against Meghan Markle in her legal claim against a tabloid newspaper for breach of her privacy, The Telegraph understands.
The Duchess is suing Associated Newspapers, the publisher of the Mail on Sunday, over its decision to publish parts of a handwritten letter she sent to her father, Thomas Markle, in August 2018, three months after her wedding.
The legal action returns to the High Court on Wednesday when the Duchess will try to keep anonymous the so-called "Five Friends" who briefed People magazine for an article in which the existence of the letter was first made public.
The Telegraph understands that the controversial new biography, "Finding Freedom", is likely to be drawn into the privacy action against the Mail on Sunday over whether the Duchess's friends, aides and public relations team spoke to the authors or acted on her behalf.
In the court case against the Mail on Sunday, Meghan has denied that she gave the green light to the "Five Friends" to speak to People magazine. But her case would be potentially undermined if the Mail on Sunday could show that the new biography was based on information provided by well-placed sources with the couple's consent.
In a statement, Prince Harry and his wife, who now live in California, have tried to distance themselves from the book.
A spokesman has insisted the couple "were not interviewed and did not contribute to 'Finding Freedom'", adding: "The book is based on the authors' own experiences as members of the royal press corps and their own independent reporting."
TELEMMGLPICT000188896211_trans_NvBQzQNjv4BqOivrFxznyCebJDmlgdQ-3tDFZjw6fEA8zxMs7expML0.jpegimwidth=480

Harry and Meghan have tried to distance themselves from the book Credit: Samir Hussein
A source close to the Sussexes said on Sunday that Meghan "was fighting the Mail on Sunday very vigorously" and "didn't even know the People magazine article was going ahead, let alone the specifics". The source said the claims in the book also "are not coming from the couple".
But royal watchers, as well as media lawyers, will be intrigued by levels of detail raised in the book, written by Omid Scobie, a British journalist said to be close to Meghan's inner circle, and American television journalist Carolyn Durand.
Among extracts published in a Sunday newspaper, the book disclosed intimate details of Meghan's final attempt to contact her father on the eve of her wedding. It reads: "Sitting in a bath later that night, FaceTiming with a friend, the bride-to-be said she had left her dad a final message, adding: 'I can't sit up all night just pressing send'."
According to The Sunday Times, the book also claims to know Meghan's "perfect pose" in a yoga position after discussing marriage with the Duke while on holiday in Africa; the expression on Archie's face when he was born; the previously undisclosed name of the couple's labrador, which has been kept a closely-guarded secret; and "sensitive conversations with members of the royal family".
Mark Stephens, a leading media lawyer and partner at Howard Kennedy solicitors, said: "I think this book is really interesting. The Mail on Sunday lawyers will look to introduce this book as similar fact evidence.
"Private briefings and curation of her reputation is going on through anonymous spokespeople and friends and the allegation with regards the People magazine article is that five of Meghan's friends – she says without her knowledge – spoke about matters that were confidential, including the letter."
The Mail on Sunday is arguing that the duchess did not expect the letter to her father to remain private, anticipated that it would be published, and that publication was in the public interest.
The newspaper is keen to point out that Mr Markle was in possession of the letter for some time before making it available to the newspaper only after he was angered by references to it in the People magazine article.
In a newspaper interview to publicise the book, Mr Scobie said when asked about the level of access, if any, that was granted to him: "The book doesn't claim to have any interviews with Harry and Meghan. And nor do we."
When then asked whether there had been an "off-the-record" discussion, he said: "You've read the book. There's no on-the-record interviews with the couple."

Asked again, he replied: "No, and I think that you can tell from the reporting, my time around the couple is enough for me to know my subjects."
Meghan Markle is suing Associated Newspapers over its decision to publish parts of a handwritten letter she sent to her father, Thomas Markle, in August 2018

Thank you @Norbs

Erm.... how the duck did Meghan see « the expression on Archie's face when he was born; »?

that must be some advanced bleeping yoga, or she was right there whilst the surrogate was trying to push him out.
 
Change of topic but documentary about a Princess Anne turning 70.
(Wednesday 9pm)
 
Last edited:
Eh? @antinoos is Aunty Legal

That’s what I thought 🤔

Change of topic but documentary about a Princess Anne turning 70.

Looking forward to that.
 
They are either being incredibly insincere in that video or the book is a load of rubbish. I suspect it is the latter. When people have a victim mentality, they can actually start to believe and perpetuate their own lies after a while. Meghan might actually be completely delusional at this point.
After watching the engagement interview and all the attempts to get it right for the cameras I'm not sure how sincere it was..!
 
Status
Thread locked. We start a new thread when they have over 1000 posts, click the blue button to see all threads for this topic and find the latest open thread.
Back
Top