Harry and Meghan #32 Enough of your woke! By the end of the year you'll be broke!

Status
Thread locked. We start a new thread when they have over 1000 posts, click the blue button to see all threads for this topic and find the latest open thread.
1
I can only imagine the stifled smirk and sidelong glance during the pastor’s homily. Which only made me like her more.



9’02”


Thank you for that. I didn’t watch the wedding and just saw bits of it on the news. All the
little royal glances and smiles. No understanding whatsoever. They wouldn’t recognise the gospel if it bit them on the bum. I actually enjoyed that. Well, it is a Sunday. 😇
 
duck face Smeagol has some bleeping nerve. By wearing a bangle that her ex husband gave her. Not only is she making a bleep of just H, she is being a snidey arse wipe. Her ex and his new wife are expecting a baby.The witch Markle would know that it would reach the news. I wouldn't like an ex of my hubby insinuating there is still a thing between them. She is awful.
Sorry i didn't realise that the bangle was anything else other than an old piece of jewellery. I see your point now
Harry is such a pathetic wimp he probably doesn't realise that there is any significance to it!
 
Here come the deluded sugars.........
Welcome to the thread.:m
No offence meant but personally I'd rather not read reams of sugar stuff. I avoid them like the plague, same as I do the bloke who runs around our local park screaming about Jesus coming back to zap all unbelievers with a ray gun. Nuttier than squirrel tit the lot of them and best avoided.

But H&M only seemed to have two witnesses (the legal requirement) her mum and his dad, so I don’t think it’s really significant that William didn’t sign. William and Eugenie and their spouses chose to have more, as they are allowed to do.
To be honest I could picture haribo saying to Wills "Well if you don't approve of my choice of bride then don't witness at the wedding Mr Fucken Know all!" And Wills calmly replying "Ok bro". and granting his wish.

I dislike Smeagol as much as everyone else on here but I don't really see why wearing an old bangle that belongs to you is a big deal.

Engelson is probably delighted that he doesn't have to have anything to do with her ever again. He probably thanks his lucky stars that he's now with someone else and having a family so i doubt he would know or care about slutface wearing an old bangle. He probably switches the TV off if her plastic face pops up on it laughing that he escaped.

As for Harry' he's thick as tit 💩 and probably wouldn't even notice.
I disagree. I think it's very disrespectful in such a very public setting. I had a ring, a necklace and a bracelet, all really good quality gold from a previous long term boyfriend, that I stopped wearing when I got engaged to my now hubby. Hubs knew where they came from and while he never commented I felt it might make him feel awkward with me wearing jewellery from two blokes. Over time I swapped them with my sisters for similar jewellery they'd tired of and that was that sorted.
I think smeggy was tit stirring for Trevor and his wife and emphasising her total control of haribo by wearing a love token from her ex and flaunting it on camera.
 
Last edited:
Actually Camilla didn’t go to Eugenie’s wedding.
Apparently she was ill.
Fergie was one of Diana’s closest friends so there may be a bit of bad blood there.
Her absence was however discreet, and Camilla, in whatever shape or form is the wife of the next King of England.
(and for what it’s worth; despite everything, she has turned the press round and I like her. She seems like fun.)



Camilla wasn't ill, she had two long standing engagements at schools in Scotland that would have been difficult to change apparently?


https://www.townandcountrymag.com/s...illa-isnt-attending-princess-eugenie-wedding/
 
Hi, long time lurker here! Thank you for enlightening me over the past few months! As an American, I am embarrassed that Meghan Markle is from here. The moment I watched her performance during the engagement interview with Harry a few years ago my bs meter immediately went off. She’s what I call an eager beaver (mind you, not the kind of beaver you all referred to upthread, ha! But now that I think about it, that applies too!) Anyway, way too eager, way too talkative and interruptive. My reaction to it was, “slow your roll, girl!” She came off phony, it was uncomfortable to watch and I was suspicious of her. I actually never knew she was black until it was mentioned at the wedding. I assumed she was Hispanic, not that it matters, but everyone was making a big deal about her being African American and I was thinking, why?

To me, it was more jaw dropping that he was marrying an American, and I was not happy with his choice. I figured she was going to go in and try to single handedly attempt to modernize the monarchy with Oprah Winfrey chirping in her ear and that she would embarrass herself and finally slow down after a strong dose of reality. I never bought that she was a victim of racism.

I think most Americans are probably just beginning to see MM as problematic. Most don’t really know 25% of what is discussed on these threads. I’ve always had interest in the Royal Family and follow more closely than most. When we go through the grocery line and see headlines about MM and PH in magazines we assume most of it is false and breeze past it.

It wasn’t until they made the decision to leave the UK that I realized what a pair of entitled Douchebags they were. Eyes wide open now and I’m disappointed with Harry, Meghan not so much. They’re both trash.
Hello little lurker, welcome. We I like the cut of your jib.
 
I went down a Google 🐇hole earlier and ended up at an article comparing recent Royal wedding dresses.

Eugenie didn't wear a veil in order to show off the low back of the beautiful dress, proudly revealing the scar from her spinal surgery to correct scoliosis. The fabric featured the white rose of York and ivy leaves 'representing the couple's home of Ivy Cottage,'

Next in the article came Meghan's Givenchy dress 'One of the main features of the gown is the boat ⛵neckline bodice - a favourite with Meghan' representing....? 🤭
 

Attachments

  • Screenshot_20200719-132141_Chrome.jpg
    Screenshot_20200719-132141_Chrome.jpg
    38.9 KB · Views: 196
I went down a Google 🐇hole earlier and ended up at an article comparing recent Royal wedding dresses.

Eugenie didn't wear a veil in order to show off the low back of the beautiful dress, proudly revealing the scar from her spinal surgery to correct scoliosis. The fabric featured the white rose of York and ivy leaves 'representing the couple's home of Ivy Cottage,'

Next in the article came Meghan's Givenchy dress 'One of the main features of the gown is the boat ⛵neckline bodice - a favourite with Meghan' representing....? 🤭

😁 Naughty.
I thought Meghan looked lovely on her wedding day and so did her dress. I can’t take that away from her just because she has turned out to be hypocritical and annoying.
 
😁 Naughty.
I thought Meghan looked lovely on her wedding day and so did her dress. I can’t take that away from her just because she has turned out to be hypocritical and annoying.

I didn’t like Meghans dress at all and her hair was just a mess.

A bit ‘meh’ about Beatrice’s dress too, but I really like the symbolism of wearing her Grans dress. The tiara was beautiful though as were the flowers round the church.

So long as she’s happy 🤞 that’s all that matters.
 
😁 Naughty.
I thought Meghan looked lovely on her wedding day and so did her dress. I can’t take that away from her just because she has turned out to be hypocritical and annoying.
The wedding dress was badly fitted. The hair was a mess. The second dress she wore was better. She use to dress and look better before she joined the Royal family. Her hair use to look really good.
 
My question was more, why they didn’t decide to have a small intimate gathering the minute they realised the big wedding wouldn’t happen. They could have married weeks ago. If they decided to stay completely private, all power to them. They certainly pulled it off (just proving that it is possible by the way). But that could have been done earlier as well as now. Instead we got a note that it would be delayed and no other plans revealed (as opting for an intimate, private ceremony for now). Neither COVID, the Queens age nor Andrew’s troubles or her wish for a family came up yesterday. I find it just surprising that’s all.

Re: the cheating rumours. I think his ex alluded to this in an interview? If he is a cheat that’s certainly not a nice character trait but not my problem. It’s Bea’s now. So many people cheat, it’s hardly a crime and private business. But it seems things have settled down between all of them which is especially nice for the boy.
Moving to Italy might be a good call for her. I think we will see way less of her, just as she likes it. Hopefully it opens the eyes of some, that royals are absolutely capable of finding privacy if they actually seek it.
Social distancing regulations?

This to me is clearly why she wore the queens dress?

Plus, good on her for not hanging on for the full tax payer extravaganza! Smeg and mug could take few leaves out of Beatrice and Ed's 'how to have some class and decorum in tough times' book!
 
Yes that could have made a big difference. I just didn’t like the bit added on the bottom either.

When was Beatrice supposed to get married originally? Surely her dress would have been designed and ordered, possibly even made a good few weeks before then?
May I believe, though lockdown would have prevented fittings etc so maybe that's why, if a change of dress occured, her gran's was altered.
 
Social distancing regulations?

This to me is clearly why she wore the queens dress?

Plus, good on her for not hanging on for the full tax payer extravaganza! Smeg and mug could take few leaves out of Beatrice and Ed's 'how to have some class and decorum in tough times' book!

Possibly they also hoped when the wedding was cancelled that the rules would change quicker than they actually have for mass gatherings.
I think at the start of this covid nightmare we all thought (hoped) it would be over far quicker than it has been. But yes, good on them. It’s put quite a romantic spin on the whole event. Almost like a wartime wedding.

May I believe, though lockdown would have prevented fittings etc so maybe that's why, if a change of dress occured, her gran's was altered.

I’m sure though that she had to have fittings etc in order to get her grans dress altered. I would have loved to have seen her original dress. Needs must at the moment though.

Meghan's two dresses were both beautiful, but they were so ill fitted. She'd either lost a huge amount of weight all over, or she hadn't had a fitting in the days before. Considering the budget and designers for them, it didn't make sense.

I really liked the second (evening) one she wore.
 
Status
Thread locked. We start a new thread when they have over 1000 posts, click the blue button to see all threads for this topic and find the latest open thread.
Back
Top