Harry and Meghan #17 Not Thriving but Skiving.

Status
Thread locked. We start a new thread when they have over 1000 posts, click the blue button to see all threads for this topic and find the latest open thread.
1
The elephant segment on GMA.
The “ interview” was filmed last summer. It was just a trailer
www.goodmorningamerica.com

Meghan Markle talks about Disney+ ‘Elephant’ documentary

The Duchess of Sussex sat down with the filmmakers last year to talk about her experience working on “Elephant” and her connection to the “majestic” animals.
www.goodmorningamerica.com www.goodmorningamerica.com

however, it appears to be a lead in into bitching about the tabloids
 
Her pre-record for Good Morning America, talking about the elephant job snatch film, is up. Only talks about the nellies though, not Hazard or Archiedoll.



There's also this GMA report about her tabloid ban. She isn't interviewed, it's just a report.

 
A couple of points about todays drama .. 1st point re Harry's text to Thomas Markle ..... in the 1st text he texts U in place of YOU ,and in the 2nd text YOU replaces U so clearly sent by 2 different people ,and the threats in the texts are barely hidden, but they are there ....... Secondly RF must be absolutely raving if Philip has come out of retirement to comment as he has today in a message parts of which are clearly aimed at Harry
 
Charles and the rest of the family must be feeling so embarrassed about Harry's behaviour, I keep imagining them cringing seeing him on a pap walk looking so awful. I wonder if any of them are trying to contact him getting him to pipe down? Or find out if he's gone mad?

Why hasn't Harry questioned any of Meghan's decisions without taking advice from anyone? Of course he knows the family despise Meghan, along with all his friends who no longer have any contact with him. He still hasn't woken up to his own stupidity and given that he is really dim this could drag on for ages 🙄
 
Last edited:
DaisyDeluxe said:
I don't believe for a minute he wrote those texts.
Click to expand...
Yes, I do and for exactly that reason. A man so tone deaf as to behave how he does would not be so considerate to type American spellings in a text message.. Also, For some reason I just don't think Harry would use text talk such as 'u' for example.

Norbs said:
They call a spade an effing shovel, that’s for sure. 😍

Random thought; they’re promising ‘zero engagement’ with these papers, but does legal action not count as engagement...?
Click to expand...
I can't see the point in her taking the DM to court about publishing a letter that they had permission from the recipient to publish? Seems daft to me..

Jelly Bean said:
They just spoke to the editor of The Express on the radio - he said they weren't having much engagement with them at the moment anyway, but was a bit surprised at the timing as there really are more important things going on at the moment so he wondered why they felt it was so vital for them to do it now?
Click to expand...
She needs the attention
 
smellyfootballboots said:
Yes, I do and for exactly that reason. A man so tone deaf as to behave how he does would not be so considerate to type American spellings in a text message.. Also, For some reason I just don't think Harry would use text talk such as 'u' for example.


I can't see the point in her taking the DM to court about publishing a letter that they had permission from the recipient to publish? Seems daft to me..


She needs the attention
Click to expand...

It can only be that. Attention. Anyone who wanted privacy and normality would just get on with their lives and ignore the negativity. Why do they care so much about what’s printed? It’s here that they’re printing it, it has no affect to their lives over there. They have no part of life here so why care so much about what’s said?

Flipping Hell ! said:
No doubt pleaded with him to keep his mouth shut, I still believe he was told not to attend
Click to expand...

Why didn’t Harry at least meet the man before the wedding? And speak to him like a human being instead of sending him texts like he was some random stranger.
 
Reading those texts sent to Thomas Markle, what strikes me is that they sound very much as though they were aimed at public consumption, not just for a Thomas' eyes. Rather like the letter, in fact. There's too much explanation/justification (not sure that's the best way of putting it...), a bit like when, say, you read a book that's a sequel, there are odd bits in it that kind of fill in background detail so you can keep up even if you haven't read the earlier one. I may be completely wrong about it, obviously, but there's just something about them that doesn't ring true...
 
Status
Thread locked. We start a new thread when they have over 1000 posts, click the blue button to see all threads for this topic and find the latest open thread.
Back
Top