Harry and Meghan #127 Harry's got out his handwriting pen, time to tell his truth again

Status
Thread locked. We start a new thread when they have over 1000 posts, click the blue button to see all threads for this topic and find the latest open thread.
1
Bugger, thread closed and I wanted to reply to this @Cinnamon.girl post -

" I think that the Therapy Harry is having is making him worse rather than better. After all the whole point of therapy in cases like his is to enable you to move on from the events and issues of the past. But it seems to be achieving the exact opposite with Harry. He is becoming ever more fixated on the past and the way he sees it to the point where he is utterly unable to think of anything or anyone else, put his issues into any kind context or move on at all.
If he was having therapy he would be getting better. The tapping and twitching and REM were just a play-acting con for Apple to pretend to help MH sufferers but I bet it's not helped a single person. He's totally out of touch with reality, and if he was having therapy he'd be advised to take a step back, go somewhere quiet, have his therapy sessions and allow himself to heal by looking forward not back.
We are supposed to believe that these two have just had a child and are taking parental leave to bond, but instead they're on the attack yet again.
Anyway Minge wants him angry and on the back foot as it fuels their project. A healing drug-free NoBalls wouldn't suit at all. He may have had therapy in the past but I doubt he's having it now."



He lied to Oprah when he said he started having therapy four years ago.
He had said previously that William had encouraged him to start therapy long before he even met Meghan.


So...................... how about this theory........he STOPPED having therapy 4 years ago.
We think he stopped taking his prescribed medication around that time, so it isn't too big a stretch to assume he handed over his mental health care to Meghan completely at that time.
 
PWB has released his new book sleeve just for us
 

Attachments

  • 9C094E3E-9478-46DC-96FB-A2C82883E507.jpeg
    9C094E3E-9478-46DC-96FB-A2C82883E507.jpeg
    54.7 KB · Views: 179
Thanks for the new thread @Doodlebug005 and yay for my title 💃 (That's me doing a happy dance btw, I'm not trying to flash you all my knickers!)

I'm a little bit concerned for PWB and how his crayon's hold up in the Montecito heat! I'm assuming that he lives in the wendy house in the garden (probably no air conditioning down there), so I hope he's not knee deep in a rainbow coloured puddle of melted wax whilst he's penning his best seller!
 
That is the ostriching thing, if something was done before, the RF will bury their heads in the sand, and do nothing.

Or to react, the Queen whose mind operates in precedents will need one, to react.
The gender reveal for example, could be one.

The rest, memoirs, tell all, Oprah, title usage for merching it was all there.
They where ostriching then with previous Royals, and now the Harkles are having an excuse.
It's disgusting, but valid, a media battle which the RF could not win.

That BP statement is also glorious, we finally have the balls to point out that Sunshine Sachs and the Harkles are not consulting us, and are flying solo basically.

See Lilibucks name, see Queen approved this, Queen approved that.

Harry may go after the courtiers, implement them with the conspiracy, how they drove Diana into paranoia, how they were plotting, then he will add Peg, without the courtiers Diana would be alive, she would have RPO, she would have protection...

Its all been done before, yep it's fucked.
 
If Harry Markle's blog is right and there is a film about St Di's dying in the offing, based on the Traitor's memoir, it seems that Harry has markled himself very succinctly in his little high heeled booties. Undermined everything he was supposedly tap-tapping himself about.


Thank you @spangly for the title and @Doodlebug005 for the recap.

There was a comment in reply to my post on the previous thread that there have been conspiracy stories about Diana's death for years. This is true, but what I meant to say was that her son Hazzno hinting at it now is a very different kettle of fish for the RF as he's one of their own. Hazzno suggesting that his mother was bumped off by his grandfather with the connivance of his uncaring father although ludicrous is very dangerous and this is why I think he's sealed his fate.
It doesn't have to be in print, the hint is out there now - as of yesterday? - from the horse's mouth and Hazzno has been unbelievably stupid.
It came from him directly, and is being discussed in the media with ages to go before publication. Maybe NoBalls thinks this will give him and his Ho plenty of time to leverage the RF with the "children", money and titles in exchange for toning down his "memoir" or such. But it may finally push the RF into dealing with the pair of them once and for all in a way that we might not expect.
 
Last edited:
From The Telegraph:

The Crown wanted scenes of bottles being thrown at the Queen, John Lydon tells Sex Pistols court case
Former frontman said he refused to allow God Save the Queen to be used in the Netflix drama after learning how it was to be used

ByAnita Singh, ARTS AND ENTERTAINMENT EDITOR21 July 2021 • 6:08pm
John Lydon, aka Johnny Rotten, smokes outside the Rolls Building at the High Court, London

The producers of The Crown tried to invent scenes of a rioting crowd pelting the Queen with bottles during her Silver Jubilee procession, John Lydon has claimed.

The former Sex Pistols frontman said he refused to allow God Save the Queen to be used in the Netflix drama after learning how it was to be used.

"It was a very perverse interpretation of the history of the Jubilee," Lydon told the High Court, where he gave evidence as part of a dispute with his former bandmates.

It is the latest accusation of falsehood to hit the show, which has been accused of a series of inventions that portray the Royal family in an unflattering light.
On June 7 1977, the day of the Jubilee procession, the Sex Pistols staged a publicity stunt to perform God Save the Queen on a boat down the Thames.
Lydon said he was open to the idea of the song being used on The Crown’s soundtrack.

But in his witness statement to court, he said: “Then it turned into the producers wanting to use actors for a re-enactment of [the] famous boat trip.

The producers of The Crown wanted to distort the history of the day and depict me as a political protester and to show scenes of protest in front of the Queen in the middle of her Jubilee celebrations. Events that simply did not happen.

“The story that they presented was with the Queen in despair in her carriage, and all those ugly scenes on the streets of crowds fighting and chucking bottles, whilst others were celebrating the Queen.

“Nobody was rioting, and here is my real, serious problem with it. This never happened. This is a lie about history.

“There were no bricks and bottles thrown at the Queen… it’s a lie. The only people making any demonstration at all about the Royal family that day were the Sex Pistols on a boat trip down the Thames - lovely songs of protest in front of the Houses of Parliament, and that’s it."

“They can mish-mash history all they want, but they can’t do it using my name,” he said
 
The concise and insightful Douglas Murray gives Harry his pedigree.

“invading their own privacy”

Calls the “racist” claim libellous

For me the clincher was that he highlights the promise made by HMTQ to the British people and the Commonwealth to devote herself to their service, no matter how short or long her life would be. Now here she is 70 years later in her mid 90s indefatigable and tirelessly loving through her grief.
The contrast with me, me,me Harry and the ghastly wife couldn’t be more stark.

Feel free to skip ahead to 30 second mark

 
Status
Thread locked. We start a new thread when they have over 1000 posts, click the blue button to see all threads for this topic and find the latest open thread.
Back
Top