Harry and Meghan #123 Too scared to speak to Gan-Gan because he’s a pathetic little man

Status
Thread locked. We start a new thread when they have over 1000 posts, click the blue button to see all threads for this topic and find the latest open thread.
1
I have a hope that if (when) H&M divorce, he meets and falls madly in love with a nice lassie from the Scottish Western Highlands, who says to him "why would I want to live in any of those fancy cities, when I have all this amazing nature here on my doorstep" and insists on them living in a remote croft with no internet connection apart from what is available at the local pub 10 miles away.

Come on, out with it.
What did the poor lassie you have in mind, ever do to you that you would line her up as PWBW2.0? :eek: :ROFLMAO:
 
I can see why they've got Farch at No.7 but I think they'll remove him at some point. They've left him there for the time being as there would be an outcry if they took him off. Once he's on it's difficult to take him off. I think that the absence of Lil, if she remains absent which I think she will, is the RF intention for both of them and neither will eventually be listed.
They can remove the ginger root vegetable later as well while they're at it. Job done, Monarchy trimmed. 🥕

Remove the ginger root vegetable looooool 😄😄😄😘 xx.


I've made a root vegetable chart 😄 Harry is on there in his rightful place 😄 x.

Resizer_16257944952300.jpg
 
Come on, out with it.
What did the poor lassie you have in mind, ever do to you that you would line her up as PWBW2.0? :eek: :ROFLMAO:


Aye yer right. Mah apologies to all Scottish lassies, I wasnae thinkin aboot them, only the wee ginger numpty and how tae git him oot mah hair.


(as a side note, I grew up in the north west highlands of Scotland, so I was thinking more about how remote some of the villages are and how it would be great to stick H up there and forget about him. Also how none of the locals would put up with his fancy nonsense or his talk of being 'triggered' and he would get a good education in keeping it real and may after 20-30 years be somewhat less of a woke pillock)
 
So what did I miss?! I'm thinking it's good I've been elsewhere because it means since that statue they are actually on baby leave and nothing significant and annoying happened. Don't worry, don't fill me in I'll scroll but I thought in case you missed me or didn't even realise I was missing 😱 i'd announce my airport check in 😜
Less about me and back to them, watching the footie and PW attending, I did think that H will not have the kind of events where you feel the royal presence of royals as you do in England. Even if a Hollywood party happens (yeah right 😏) H&M aren't royal or enigmatic enough and besides La La land events have bigger egos than to care about a Primark version of a royal.
 
It's not difficult to put billboards up, and Republic have been flogging their dead horse for a long time and it's not gained traction or become more popular. So lovely to hear the crowds and William belting out our National Anthem. Anti-monarchists every one of them! Like the crowds singing for HM when she arrived at the races, showing their support, and when PP died.
The RF is going through a difficult time with HM nearing the end of her reign, worries about Camilla and the attacks by the treasonous son. But I think Charles will be OK, William and Catherine have turned out to be treasures along with Sophie and Edward, and the vast majority of people love our Monarchy.
I'd like to know who the sour Republic stiflers of our patriotism propose to install in place of the Monarch. An Erdogan or Macron? Tittering creepy dwarf Macron spent over 60,000 Euros on make-up in one year.
Republic won't happen, the Monarchy is safe and being quietly guided by us Tattlers. I'm not joking. BP need feedback, and they may have noted our approval of their grey-rock tactics. Our conclusions and observations have been picked up and implemented so clearly Geidt and Young follow this thread, discuss our advice over kippers in the morning, and then present our / their advice to HMTQ. Also the newspapers comments sections, which mirror what we say here.
There are lots of clever people on this site with legal and technical know-how, and unlike the gormless uneducated SS bots we are a different kettle of fish. I would say hand on heart that we are the voice of Middle Britain and that we are being quietly listened to.

On a bum note because it relates to Minge, the new Freda avatar recycled from threads back is haunting. I can still see it when I close my eyes....I saw the Minge face in a pile of swedes in Asda today... :love: !!
Excellent. Can I also add the Commonwealth country of Australia to the voice of “middle Britain” too. We get the Republicans spewing their stuff here too but it usually goes nowhere. I also think most of us have proven that we do support the RF. Having said that, I am sure when it’s PC turn, they will amp up the push so hopefully he is already aware of that and it won’t faze him too much.
 
I've just taken another look at the line of sucession on the royal family website and Lilibet still isn't on the list, although Lucas Tindall (born a month earlier) is on there and Eugenie's son August.

I don't believe that this is due to an oversight or staff being too busy to update something as important as this.
How intriguing. I bet the Harkles haven't sent any photos or a birth certificate to them. So the RF are probably still waiting for some proof that the baby exists (like the rest of us).

I wonder how long it will be until the sugar lumps suss this out and start screaming about discrimination 😁

I'm pleased to hear that the Mail on Sunday are going to interview Yankee Wally. I hope she makes some money out of it too. Scrotie is going to get savaged 😁

Perhaps that's the reason he's upset today 🤔
 
The National Enquirer was/is one of the US tabloids available & in your face at every check out line in the grocery stores & pharmacy stores. One of the ones that used to post constant pictures of Diana & family back in the day.

The thing I remember it for is the photos they published of Whitney Houston's room full of drugs paraphanalia etc
I think it was one of the first, er, "publications" to publish proof of her downward spiral.

It isnt a classy paper/magazine but it does sometimes publish accurate info.

I havent seen a copy for ages. Does it appear to be pro or anti Meghan?

Somebody asked about Wally’s big news. On one of the fb groups they say she has done a big interview with the Mail On Sunday about bullying, bots etc. So if true we should see it this weekend.

'Twas me who asked.

I was just curious. I'm also curious to know why she isn't a Tattler. She mentioned once that she was aware of the site and she even quoted posts from here.

I've just taken another look at the line of sucession on the royal family website and Lilibet still isn't on the list, although Lucas Tindall (born a month earlier) is on there and Eugenie's son August.

I don't believe that this is due to an oversight or staff being too busy to update something as important as this.
How intriguing. I bet the Harkles haven't sent any photos or a birth certificate to them. So the RF are probably still waiting for some proof that the baby exists (like the rest of us).

I wonder how long it will be until the sugar lumps suss this out and start screaming about discrimination 😁

I'm pleased to hear that the Mail on Sunday are going to interview Yankee Wally. I hope she makes some money out of it too. Scrotie is going to get savaged 😁

Perhaps that's the reason he's upset today 🤔

If its true that the ITV documentary cut his unsubstantiated comments about Prince William instructing his staff to "plant" stories in the press, Im guessing it was because William's lawyers were involved.

And if itv pulled content because of a threat of legal action, it wouldn't be unreasonable to assume Omid Scobie was given a legal warning, ie the UK equivalent of a "cease and desist" letter.

That will have frightened him.
 
Last edited:
The thing I remember it for is the photos they published of Whitney Houston's room full of drugs paraphanalia etc
I think it was one of the first, er, "publications" to publish proof of her downward spiral.

It isnt a classy paper/magazine but it does sometimes publish accurate info.

I havent seen a copy for ages. Does it appear to be pro or anti Meghan?



'Twas me who asked.

I was just curious. I'm also curious to know why she isn't a Tattler. She mentioned once that she was aware of the site and she even quoted posts from here.



If its true that the ITV documentary cut his unsubstantiated comments about Prince William instructing his staff to "plant" stories in the press, Im guessing it was because William's lawyers were involved.

And if itv pulled content because of a threat of legal action, it wouldn't be unreasonable to assume Omid Scobie was given a legal warning, ie the UK equivalent of a "cease and desist" letter.

That will have frightened him.
Good, it's about bloody time too.
 
For the above post that did not show

View attachment 654454 q

Thank you for taking a screenshot too.

By the time a lot of us read the thread, the tweets in the Twitter links are no longer available so we’ve no idea what they said.
Please could we all post a screen shot as well as the Twitter link so that in the (highly likely) event that the tweet is subsequently deleted, we all know what is being discussed? Thank you for your cooperation! 😜😁
 
"Baroness Bruck on Twitter: "It's been 14 weeks since the END of the Megxit review period... 🤔🔍⏳ When is the Palace going to announce NEW Patrons, Military honours & leadership for the Queen's Commonwealth Trust ?? 🤷🏻‍♀️ The Sussexes had their fair time to mope -- maybe it's time to move on, non ?? 🔥 https://tattle.life/threads/19920/" / Twitter"
 
Status
Thread locked. We start a new thread when they have over 1000 posts, click the blue button to see all threads for this topic and find the latest open thread.
Back
Top