Harry and Meghan #123 Too scared to speak to Gan-Gan because he’s a pathetic little man

Status
Thread locked. We start a new thread when they have over 1000 posts, click the blue button to see all threads for this topic and find the latest open thread.
1
Thalia said:
Has 6's wife dropped him faster than a sack of tit and flown over to "console" her future husband brother-in-law? No? I don't believe it then.

If I had to gamble on which of the four would be unfaithful it would be 6's wife because that's how she's always got on in life and if I had to bet on which marriage would crumble first, I wouldn't bet on the Cambridges.
Click to expand...
Bet she is thinking duck just 5 years. I should have waited.
 
Now that it has been 'established' that isolating due to Covid is a sign that you are about to divorce Prince William, I would like to share the reasons why I don't believe he had an affair:
1. He lived through his parents' acrimonious divorce and saw far too much especially as he was a child.
2. He seems to have a strong sense of right. I believe the reports that he was livid when he was told that HFEW had bullied their staff.
3. I don't believe that W & C could demonstrate such rapport if there was something like this between them.

So, what is the truth behind the rumours?
1. It has been mentioned on here that they could have come from HFEW. Well, she doesn't seem very nice does she?
2. Maybe W had a genuine friendship with Rose that made C uncomfortable so she nipped it in the bud. (Excuse the pun.)
3. I believe the Cambridges and the Cholmondeleys became friends because they were neighbours. People do make friends with new neighbours and then decide they don't really like them.
4. Maybe the Cholmondeleys borrowed the Cambridges ride-on lawn mower and returned it broken.
5. Maybe one of the 4 people concerned is irritating or boring.

Call me old fashioned if you will, but I think a more reliable sign of trouble in a marriage is when one person goes from happy and smiling to sullen and ill-tempered. Possibly even wearing brown shoes as a cry for help.:unsure:
 
The Wicked Lady said:
Now that it has been 'established' that isolating due to Covid is a sign that you are about to divorce Prince William, I would like to share the reasons why I don't believe he had an affair:
1. He lived through his parents' acrimonious divorce and saw far too much especially as he was a child.
2. He seems to have a strong sense of right. I believe the reports that he was livid when he was told that HFEW had bullied their staff.
3. I don't believe that W & C could demonstrate such rapport if there was something like this between them.

So, what is the truth behind the rumours?
1. It has been mentioned on here that they could have come from HFEW. Well, she doesn't seem very nice does she?
2. Maybe W had a genuine friendship with Rose that made C uncomfortable so she nipped it in the bud. (Excuse the pun.)
3. I believe the Cambridges and the Cholmondeleys became friends because they were neighbours. People do make friends with new neighbours and then decide they don't really like them.
4. Maybe the Cholmondeleys borrowed the Cambridges ride-on lawn mower and returned it broken.
5. Maybe one of the 4 people concerned is irritating or boring.

Call me old fashioned if you will, but I think a more reliable sign of trouble in a marriage is when one person goes from happy and smiling to sullen and ill-tempered. Possibly even wearing brown shoes as a cry for help.:unsure:
Click to expand...

Great post and it just shows what a spiteful, desperate pair of arseholes they have now become.

How bitter and twisted is Paxo, I would say she has opened a can of worms and can't control it anymore, she would be better to cut and run and revert to seedy movies and shagging rich old wrinklies, serves her right but what can the RF do about him?? Long term asylum care comes to mind shoved away in a backwater somewhere.

I really do not care what happens to either of them but the family need to tell him his fortune and she will leg it, and at least here we do not revert to telling lies we look, opine and wait for the truth to emerge.

Children will be the biggest problem for the RF. I cannot help feeling angry for the surrogate/s who handed over a dear innocent baby to these two bleeping lunatics, do they not check who is taking them??
 
Jusa said:
Yes, it's true that the Royal Family website hasn't been updated, and makes no mention of Lil D.
I included a screenshot of PWBW info on the website yesterday in a post on here, and I've just rechecked again, and it still reads the same that they have one child, Archie
Click to expand...
Thanks for checking.... does anyone else think that this is significant?

It might just be that they are slow updating the website of course but we've seen NO proof that Lilibet exists.

That birth certificate doing the rounds on social media wasn't the correct birth certificate and we've seen no baby pictures. Smeggy is quiet. WTF is going on here?
 
Scotch Mist said:
Thanks for checking.... does anyone else think that this is significant?

It might just be that they are slow updating the website of course but we've seen NO proof that Lilibet exists.

That birth certificate doing the rounds on social media wasn't the correct birth certificate and we've seen no baby pictures. Smeggy is quiet. WTF is going on here?
Click to expand...

Given how good the media team is at updating across all platforms, I feel like if they wanted to update the website, they had the length of time between pregnancy announcement and birth announcement to be ready the sentence using "insert name here". Wouldn't take much more to upload.

Something is afoot 🤔
 
Scotch Mist said:
Thanks for checking.... does anyone else think that this is significant?

It might just be that they are slow updating the website of course but we've seen NO proof that Lilibet exists.

That birth certificate doing the rounds on social media wasn't the correct birth certificate and we've seen no baby pictures. Smeggy is quiet. WTF is going on here?
Click to expand...

With a bit of luck she will have choked on the PR from the family or gone too far and choked on chicken🐓🐓 perhaps she has reached a point of diminishing returns and doesn't know what to do next, he is now a loose cannon for her and an object of ridicule by all and she is going down the Crapper with him.

I think that during the next few days some dastardly scheme will spew from their their lying pie holes and it will be laughable, they haven't got much to use or lose now, have they??
 
NorthernValkyrie said:
Given how good the media team is at updating across all platforms, I feel like if they wanted to update the website, they had the length of time between pregnancy announcement and birth announcement to be ready the sentence using "insert name here". Wouldn't take much more to upload.

Something is afoot 🤔
Click to expand...
They've had a month to do the update and still nothing. It's very suspicious 🤔
Why has anyone in the mainstream media picked up on this?
 
İ've seen her referred to as Skidmarkle, and reading this headlne quickly in DM places the idea of skidmarks in relation to them and their foundation/charidee/fleece-factory.

https://www.12ft.io/https://www.dailymail.co.uk/tvshowbiz/article-9758681/EDEN-CONFIDENTIAL--
Sussexes trademark-bid-Archewell-hits-skids-America.html
 
Scotch Mist said:
They've had a month to do the update and still nothing. It's very suspicious 🤔
Why has anyone in the mainstream media picked up on this?
Click to expand...

Would like to think that the title removal and the succession order is in the pipeline or am I being too optimistic again??

The RF are quiet too perhaps his time his nigh and the explosion will occur perhaps sooner than we think for the Wanker and Wankess of Wokedom.

Wouldn't that make us all happy!!😆😆😆😆O
 
Scotch Mist said:
They've had a month to do the update and still nothing. It's very suspicious 🤔
Why has anyone in the mainstream media picked up on this?
Click to expand...

I'm surprised the squad hasn't picked up on it. Oh wait, that's right, they aren't interested in royalty unless it's their qween so why would they go to an official website?
It's almost worth those of us on twitter to tweet about it and see if it gets picked up by anyone who might be able to take it further. But then, we could sit on it a bit longer and see if anything comes out (I wonder if any Palace staff lurk here and have twigged it's now been noticed? Hi guys, if so! We're all TeamQueen here!) There has to be a reason for this. The Palace would be all too aware that if it was slackness on their part - even if, say, staff were changing jobs - if/when it was noticed the screams about racism from the twerps would be through the roof so there must be solid evidence as to why not. Which makes one very curious indeed 🧐
 
Stargazerlily said:
There are many crucial differences between a US non-profit foundation like Arsehowell and, for example, a UK registered charity. Arsehowell is, broadly, a tax dodge and potential way of creaming off 95% from donations. There is no equivalent in the UK. Screwing a non-profit is the brilliant insight Hazza's wife brought to the party - how they'd make billions off their incredible popularity and "platform". What we understand as charity in the UK is strictly regulated by the Charities Commission, within tight limits for what can be taken to cover running costs. It is completely misleading to describe the Arsehowell Foundation as charity - it is, in fact, yet another way in which the Harkles exploit the underprivileged. It is no wonder the Queen and the rest of the Royal Family and the British public are all disgusted that what the Harkles are doing yet again undermines their own work for in support of legitimate charitable endeavour.
Click to expand...

Excuse my ignorance here, and I'm genuinely not trying to tit stir as I'm no fan of number 6 and his wife.

Catheine has also set up the Early Years foundation, but is it a different type of foundation to that of the harkles and the Clinton's? Is that because her foundation is registered in the UK and theirs in the USA?

I canne get my head round it. Someone please help this poor thick to understand.

Thanks!
 
mardymare said:
İ've seen her referred to as Skidmarkle, and reading this headlne quickly in DM places the idea of skidmarks in relation to them and their foundation/charidee/fleece-factory.

https://www.12ft.io/https://www.dailymail.co.uk/tvshowbiz/article-9758681/EDEN-CONFIDENTIAL--
Sussexes trademark-bid-Archewell-hits-skids-America.html
Click to expand...

Raising my hopes that this is the beginning of the end for the charlatans of Montiskinto
 
Screenshot_20210706_132341.jpg
Screenshot_20210706_132359.jpg

Apologies if already posted, Penny Junior in the Daily Star stating the bleeding obvious which Tattle has discussed many times .
 
Nuttynana said:
Would like to think that the title removal and the succession order is in the pipeline or am I being too optimistic again??

The RF are quiet too perhaps his time his nigh and the explosion will occur perhaps sooner than we think for the Wanker and Wankess of Wokedom.

Wouldn't that make us all happy!!😆😆😆😆O
Click to expand...

That would explain the lack of update - why bother update a page which is about to be deleted/completely changed?
And also would explain why the statue was PW & PH, softening the blow of one being HRH and not the other? Means the people wouldn't know about a still-private decision.
As you say, the RF are being incredibly quiet. There is something coming, can you feel it in the air?
Quiet, yet bubbling optimism might be the way forward for us!
 
Scotch Mist said:
They've had a month to do the update and still nothing. It's very suspicious 🤔
Why has anyone in the mainstream media picked up on this?
Click to expand...
They don't appear to have updated anything about the Harkles since they stopped being members of the RF. There's a brief sentence about stepping back and a brief sentence about not returning and that's it. All the others are up to date.
Personally I wouldn't waste time on them when it comes to the RF website so I don't blame the staff working on it for ignoring them as well.
 
The Devils Arse said:
Excuse my ignorance here, and I'm genuinely not trying to tit stir as I'm no fan of number 6 and his wife.

Catheine has also set up the Early Years foundation, but is it a different type of foundation to that of the harkles and the Clinton's? Is that because her foundation is registered in the UK and theirs in the USA?

I canne get my head round it. Someone please help this poor thick to understand.

Thanks!
Click to expand...
The Early Years is part of The Royal Foundation (TRF); an offshoot if you like. TRF is a UK registered charity.
 
Cassandra333 said:
They don't appear to have updated anything about the Harkles since they stopped being members of the RF. There's a brief sentence about stepping back and a brief sentence about not returning and that's it. All the others are up to date.
Personally I wouldn't waste time on them when it comes to the RF website so I don't blame the staff working on it for ignoring them as well.
Click to expand...
They've gone end of. TRF is run by the Cambridges full stop not for their benefit but for the causes listed on-line. Wasn't there some possible scandal of mis-use of funds by the Sussex snakes?

Evangelina said:
Social change influencers:
https://www.12ft.io/https://www.dai...taff-calls-Duke-Duchess-creative-leaders.html
🤮🤮

The guy that holds some copyright for Archewell :

😂😂😂
Priceless.
Click to expand...

No, I don't love it ty. I do love the bag name though ;)
 
Status
Thread locked. We start a new thread when they have over 1000 posts, click the blue button to see all threads for this topic and find the latest open thread.
Back
Top