Harry and Meghan #116 Meggy exercising her bunions while Haz mucks about with his carrots and onions

Status
Thread locked. We start a new thread when they have over 1000 posts, click the blue button to see all threads for this topic and find the latest open thread.
1
I've just read this on DataLounge:

"Meanwhile, we can start off with a CDAN BI:
"The youngest sibling in the main group of the house of royals has been having an affair for years with a television host. They are both married."
Almost universal guess is that It could only be Prince Edward and Philip Schofield., and that the Sussexes sent this in to spite the Wessexes, especially Sophie, clearly being brought forward to replace the Sussexes.
I doubt it's a coincidence that this got sent in a week or so after Sophie's interview in the Telegraph in which she mocked Oprah.
I doubt the royals' press people track CDAN, and in the great scheme of things, it won't matter, anyway. The Sussexes are done for in the RF and will never get back in now."


I thought the general idea was that it was Ulrika Johnson?? (May have spelt the name wrong, sorry)
 
Thank you for the cropped classy title @freda19 and the great recap @cassandra.

I'm a bit anxious here with my cocoa and don't want to put my foot in it. Is he or isn't he a F Asshole? Are we agreed that he Is one and should be addressed as such? I am happy to face anyone as well who says that he's not a F Asshole (though how I'd go about it not too sure as I'm not confrontational). I think he is a FA and the evidence is Empirical as you say.

I don't want to stir up apathy on this thread, but do we need to stick to one name for him and not slag him off? Many posters here me included have called them all sorts of names, some of them very colourful as you know!
I can't settle with my choc chip muffin, so await your clarification please but PDQ so it doesn't go stale :love:🍪
ETA All the best of luck with your return to work @Bubblesdahling . You'll knock them dead! X

BIB, isnt that why we're here (in part obvs)?
 
I've just read this on DataLounge:

"Meanwhile, we can start off with a CDAN BI:
"The youngest sibling in the main group of the house of royals has been having an affair for years with a television host. They are both married."
Almost universal guess is that It could only be Prince Edward and Philip Schofield., and that the Sussexes sent this in to spite the Wessexes, especially Sophie, clearly being brought forward to replace the Sussexes.
I doubt it's a coincidence that this got sent in a week or so after Sophie's interview in the Telegraph in which she mocked Oprah.
I doubt the royals' press people track CDAN, and in the great scheme of things, it won't matter, anyway. The Sussexes are done for in the RF and will never get back in now."


I thought the general idea was that it was Ulrika Johnson?? (May have spelt the name wrong, sorry)


Evening all fabulous new thread title

Somehow i think Edward is a tad to old for scofe 😁
 
I'm really annoyed its number one in any list.
Its shyte.



Love the thread title.
Minge lectures us on "the other side of masculinity - the softness, connection and emotion" as shown in The Bench which will make the world a "more equitable and compassionate place".
In her book the ideal husband and father of her son is cearly modelled on No.6. In real life No.6 is emotionally unstable, paranoid and drugged-up, and has shown himself to be bitter, neurotic and vengeful.
Minge expects the readers not to connect the dots between this nasty ginger turd's vile TV and press attacks on his family, and the wholesome G.I. Wales returning home from war to his wife and child.
The ranting, tapping, twitching and venomous ex-royal on TV, and the heartwarming returning soldier, are one and the same grifter. It's shapeshifter Hazzno again, who showed his true colours on Porker but is now masquerading as a Veteran with a Heart in The Bench to make a quick buck.
The book is about father/son relationships, seen through the fish-eye lens of Minge so automatically distorted. We know nothing at all of No.6's relationship with Farch as we've never seen him. To write a book about a "relationship" between your son and his father based on crude photoshops, baby and child impersonators and moonbumps is beyond satire.
 
Thanks to @freda19 for the title. Sorry but I had to cut some words out to make it fit.

Vague recollections of last thread.
We don't like Meghan
We don't like Harry.
Discussion on Lilibet as a name (might be the previous thread)
Discussion on whether Haz or Megz will attend Diana statue thing.
General belief that Megz wouldn't dare and we're not too sure if Haz will either.
We talked about Tarot
Some of us came out of the Broom Closet.
There was lots of wit and wisdom.
Can't think of anything else.
Last Thread:
MOI?
:eek::eek::eek::eek::eek::eek::eek::eek::eek::eek:
Ta very muchness everyone who liked. 😘😘😘

Really good summary,well done Cass.:m
 
I'm so far behind with the Meghan and Harry threads so thought I'd just come to the new one - the thread title is fantastic, I love it. Well done Freda :)
Me too...missed most of several threads now...will never manage to catch up 😂 completely out of the loop and missing the laughs!
I think they've reached a whole new level of cuntness with the name, by the way. Something so deeply personal to HMTQ, a step far too far.
 
Minge lectures us on "the other side of masculinity - the softness, connection and emotion" as shown in The Bench which will make the world a "more equitable and compassionate place".
In her book the ideal husband and father of her son is cearly modelled on No.6. In real life No.6 is emotionally unstable, paranoid and drugged-up, and has shown himself to be bitter, neurotic and vengeful.
Minge expects the readers not to connect the dots between this nasty ginger turd's vile TV and press attacks on his family, and the wholesome G.I. Wales returning home from war to his wife and child.
The ranting, tapping, twitching and venomous ex-royal on TV, and the heartwarming returning soldier, are one and the same grifter. It's shapeshifter Hazzno again, who showed his true colours on Porker but is now masquerading as a Veteran with a Heart in The Bench to make a quick buck.
The book is about father/son relationships, seen through the fish-eye lens of Minge so automatically distorted. We know nothing at all of No.6's relationship with Farch as we've never seen him. To write a book about a "relationship" between your son and his father based on crude photoshops, baby and child impersonators and moonbumps is beyond satire.
I wonder if Harry will teach Archie to kick anyone in the nuts if they hurt him, my husband did and my son got an internal exclusion for it, or is this not what she means? Will she be spouting about compassion if any of them get bullied? I'd love to know how those conversations will go.
 
@TheShire listened to 9th - I listened to the 10th - I’ll try 11th off to check 🏃🏻‍♀️🏃🏻‍♀️😀
Have listened to 11th (you can ff in 30 sec chunks) at 2hrs 27; they have an item where they took ‘that’ book to a class of 7yr olds to read it and comment - have to say they quite liked it but the Head Teacher said it wasn’t really a story - which the age group reading it would prefer, the children seemed to enjoy the pictures. They had a little trouble pronouncing her name and one read it as ‘The Duchess of Success’ - he didn’t say anything else. 🥴
 
Oh my goodness this is absolutely a blind about H and M and her trying to get a meeting with Bill Gates when his divorce news leaked.

you couldn't make it up! She wants her fingers in all the pies! Sothirsty! To clarify - too pregnant to fly for PP funeral, not to meet Single Bill Gates.

 

Attachments

  • 9E387C71-2FA8-4AC5-9D31-71C72006BAA3.png
    9E387C71-2FA8-4AC5-9D31-71C72006BAA3.png
    48.5 KB · Views: 271
Has someone said we need to stick to one insult only? Who? Where? Why?

Why can't we slag him off? I intend to call him whatever I like.

ETA I'm going back to the end of the last thread to look as I must have missed this...
It was a post by @ResidentMerkin at the beginning of this thread. I possibly misunderstood it and wasn't sure about calling people names. Maybe @ResidentMerkin can shed some light? 🥰
 
Also let's just check in a sec:

starts moving in soho house circles. Friends are soft movers and shakers. Marries a prince. Dad doesn't pay enough money to him. Courts Spotify. Netflix. Although obviously ethically doesn't agree with big corporations and their control over the narrative. Now courting politicians and billionaires. She will over reach herself and fall off the cliff soon.The very modern definition of a gold digger. Whilst claiming the gold is for the poor.

the poor sure love it when she swoops aroundin a Gucci dress from her millionaires mansion to drop off a sandwich and have her photo taken. Naming her child after two of the most famous women in recent history. Whilst notstanding for white or hereditary privilege. Yet using it over and over. It's like a form of an extreme escort business. H thought he was getting his little nuclear family. He finds himself in the employ of a ruthless brothel madam.
 
Status
Thread locked. We start a new thread when they have over 1000 posts, click the blue button to see all threads for this topic and find the latest open thread.
Back
Top