Father of Daughters #54 Delivering bargain basement content both literally and figuratively

Status
Thread locked. We start a new thread when they have over 1000 posts, click the blue button to see all threads for this topic and find the latest open thread.
1
The only doctor i know and met who was struck off the register was the one who carried out sexual assaults against midwives (he was a gynecologist). Even the doctor who admitted to “cutting corners” which lead to the death of a 4 year old was still allowed to practice. (UK)

Midwives who get struck off are the ones whose actions tend to lead to the death of babies.

I personally don’t think she should have lost her job, but understand that others might disagree.
 
Last edited:
Don’t know if these were posted but the brand took the bait with the post/stories about the shoes:

All of their wedding-related posts have been just unbelievably self centred. Even before they went he was saying how everyone would be paying attention to his haircut, then it was them both banging on and on about their delight at being without the kids (again), and using it as a tag-fest to promote themselves to brands.

Not once did they thank the newlyweds, wish them well or say kind words about the day. It's disgustingly rude IMO to use it for their own self promotion.
 
Amazed they’ve still got cash in the biz account, they must be drawing down on it slowly to top up their PAYE salaries. Must have paid for the love island villa garden!

Tho at that rate it’ll be gone by next year, which lends itself to your guys’ theories that she’s trying to make her comeback. For what tho - teeth whitening kits and CBD? 😳
 
Their tax bill didn't go from £60k to £15k.
Their corporation tax recoverable (as in, owed to the company by HMRC) went from £3.5k to £10.9k. The only reason they would be getting (previously paid) tax back from HMRC is if they now are making substantial losses. However I'm confused as to what expenses they can be putting through the company to make such losses? They also have trade creditors of £5k which is money they owe their suppliers. What suppliers?

Clemmie previously owed the company £56k and this was repaid in January 21. I'm assuming in order to do this, they had to take money out of the company (i.e. pay themselves dividends from retained profits) and then repay the loan back to the company.

Trade debtors £30 is a big fat LOL, as as far as I'm aware the company's activities are influencing, so that would mean they were owed £30 for a brand partnership at the end of December. Haha! (Nothing last year.)

You can't really tell an awful lot from these small company accounts but the situation has definitely worsened from their heyday. I'd say it's been over for them for a while (as we knew!).

PS. Who is their 3rd employee?
 
Their tax bill didn't go from £60k to £15k.
Their corporation tax recoverable (as in, owed to the company by HMRC) went from £3.5k to £10.9k. The only reason they would be getting (previously paid) tax back from HMRC is if they now are making substantial losses. However I'm confused as to what expenses they can be putting through the company to make such losses? They also have trade creditors of £5k which is money they owe their suppliers. What suppliers?

Clemmie previously owed the company £56k and this was repaid in January 21. I'm assuming in order to do this, they had to take money out of the company (i.e. pay themselves dividends from retained profits) and then repay the loan back to the company.

Trade debtors £30 is a big fat LOL, as as far as I'm aware the company's activities are influencing, so that would mean they were owed £30 for a brand partnership at the end of December. Haha! (Nothing last year.)

You can't really tell an awful lot from these small company accounts but the situation has definitely worsened from their heyday. I'd say it's been over for them for a while (as we knew!).

PS. Who is their 3rd employee?
The twins.
 
Their tax bill didn't go from £60k to £15k.
Their corporation tax recoverable (as in, owed to the company by HMRC) went from £3.5k to £10.9k. The only reason they would be getting (previously paid) tax back from HMRC is if they now are making substantial losses. However I'm confused as to what expenses they can be putting through the company to make such losses? They also have trade creditors of £5k which is money they owe their suppliers. What suppliers?

Clemmie previously owed the company £56k and this was repaid in January 21. I'm assuming in order to do this, they had to take money out of the company (i.e. pay themselves dividends from retained profits) and then repay the loan back to the company.

Trade debtors £30 is a big fat LOL, as as far as I'm aware the company's activities are influencing, so that would mean they were owed £30 for a brand partnership at the end of December. Haha! (Nothing last year.)

You can't really tell an awful lot from these small company accounts but the situation has definitely worsened from their heyday. I'd say it's been over for them for a while (as we knew!).

PS. Who is their 3rd employee?

Thank you so much for this insight ❤️ Is the oldest over 16 yet? Or they could be employing a grandparent as a low tax way of getting money out the company...

Is it possible that he’s buying all this building materials & gear through the company to claim VAT back on it? He creates enough tit DIY content I’m guessing they could justify it through that? Seems dodgy that his B&Q trips are triggering a refund from HMRC tho.
 
So if I'm reading it right, the bottom line is that ALL of their Father of Daughters / House of Hooper activities during the year 2021 resulted in a net loss to the company of some £68k?

As the filing is for year to end December 2021, it won't reflect the increased activity and deals he's had during 2022 so it will be interesting to see whether that's reflected in the filing next year.

Just guessing but the third employee could be some type of home help whether that's a family member or someone else? I've long suspected they have more help at home than they let on.
 
Is it possible that he’s buying all this building materials & gear through the company to claim VAT back on it? He creates enough tit DIY content I’m guessing they could justify it through that? Seems dodgy that his B&Q trips are triggering a refund from HMRC tho.

My understanding is it would have to be "wholly and exclusively" for the business in order to put the full cost through (which clearly isn't the case when it's DIY for their family home), but it would probably be OK to claim a small percentage reflecting the split of benefit to the business vs the personal benefit.
 
Their tax bill didn't go from £60k to £15k.
Their corporation tax recoverable (as in, owed to the company by HMRC) went from £3.5k to £10.9k. The only reason they would be getting (previously paid) tax back from HMRC is if they now are making substantial losses. However I'm confused as to what expenses they can be putting through the company to make such losses? They also have trade creditors of £5k which is money they owe their suppliers. What suppliers?

Clemmie previously owed the company £56k and this was repaid in January 21. I'm assuming in order to do this, they had to take money out of the company (i.e. pay themselves dividends from retained profits) and then repay the loan back to the company.

Trade debtors £30 is a big fat LOL, as as far as I'm aware the company's activities are influencing, so that would mean they were owed £30 for a brand partnership at the end of December. Haha! (Nothing last year.)

You can't really tell an awful lot from these small company accounts but the situation has definitely worsened from their heyday. I'd say it's been over for them for a while (as we knew!).

PS. Who is their 3rd employee?
The cleaner who brings him chocolate.
 
Status
Thread locked. We start a new thread when they have over 1000 posts, click the blue button to see all threads for this topic and find the latest open thread.
Back
Top