Dr Jessica Taylor #9 Don't be fooled by the sports car I got, I'm still grifter Jessie from the block

1
Obviously I can't diagnose her, however... The more I read about her the more I'm convinced she has a personality disorder such as ASPD cough sociopathy or narcissism, however I'm leaning towards sociopathy because she has absolutely no qualms in using people to gain things such as money, fame, and power.

Considering the people she's used are victims of some of the most heinous crimes imaginable, makes what she's done even more sinister. She knows she'll get away with it, because she chooses women who are especially vulnerable and have no recourse to stop her. One day she will choose the wrong person, and they will bring her down.

I think she says that mental health diagnoses do not exist because it absolves her from having any accountability or responsibility for what she does. I think to her, her unethical actions are fine and justifiable because she isn't a sociopath using vulnerable women for gain. No, no. She is a paragon of a victim informed trauma specialist and she published the stories to help her get rich other people who are going through trauma.

I remember calling her out when she said ADHD doesn't exist and there's no medical test for it. I said Dr Russell Barkley who is one one of the most famous (actual) Dr's who specialises in ADHD, would disagree and we can see ADHD on brain scans, they're not used in diagnosis because we know that a certain set of behaviours indicates a warrant for diagnosis. She blocked me. Oh well.
 
witchofwestbyfleet said:
https://whatwouldjesssay.substack.com/p/50-free-tips-to-become-a-trauma-informed The irony of this woman telling others not to lie and gossip!
Click to expand...

Absolutely.

And, just like everything she does, she's painting a fake picture, it's completely inauthentic.

Jessica is a non-resident parent.

It's her ex who has responsibility for making these decisions about parenting day-to-day, not her.

Yet the article is written as if she's with them all the time e.g. "Talk to your kids, all the time, about everything".

Just like how she wants people to think she's a clinical psychologist who can work with clients, reading on the general public's perception that the word "psychologist" always means someone who can work with clients, so she's relying on the public's assumptions that it's usually the mother who's the resident parent.

A more authentic article would be to write from her actual experience, not pretend to be something she's not. So, something about the challenges of being a trauma informed parent while co-parenting would be way more authentic than this nonsense.

But she doesn't know how to be authentic.

In my experience, a lot of Jessica's apparently random musings online actually contain snide digs, aimed at someone close to her, but with culpable deniability if they actually call her out. ("You thought that was about you?! No, it was about something else entirely, you only needed to ask". 🙄)

So when I see something like this, I wonder it it's just random nonsense, or if it's actually a dig, aimed at someone e.g. Jaimi? Her kids? Her ex?

(Edited as hit post too soon by mistake!)
 
Last edited:
witchinghour said:
Absolutely.

And, just like everything she does, she's painting a fake picture, it's utterly inauthentic.

Jessica is a non-resident parent.

It's her ex who has responsibility for making these decisions about parenting day-to-day, not her.

Yet the article is written as if she's with them all the time e.g. "Talk to your kids, all the time, about everything".

Just like how she wants people to think she's a clinical psychologist who can work with clients, and trades on the general public's perception that the work "psychologist" always means someone who can work with clients, so she's relying on the public's assumptions that it's usually the mother who's the resident parent in splits.

She must be desperately insecure.

A more authentic article would be to write from her actual experience, not pretend to be something she's not. So, something about the challenges of being a trauma informed parent while co-parenting
Click to expand...

She can't possibly do that, being a mum is such a big part of her image - remember she's a successful academic, businesswoman, wife and mum, she's so multifaceted, no one else is like her! And she likes to complain that she's being constantly doxxed and threatened and this puts her kids in danger
 
VeniVidiVicki said:
Why don’t her kids live with her?
Click to expand...

Her kids live with her ex. He has both of them, even though he is only the biological father of one of them.

The kids do go to Jessica's, but she is the non-resident parent, her ex does the majority of parenting day-to-day.

It's the same as the set up many divorced parents have with their kids, except that it's more usually the woman who's the resident parent and the dad who has them less often.

I don't want to speculate why they have this set up though as I've only heard Jessica's version of it and I no longer trust anything she says. I notice the dad never mentions them publicly. And, they're kids who may well read this thread, or their school mates might. I wish them well and feel uncomfortable speculating on their relationship with their mum, beyond stating basic facts.

But when Jessica styles herself as a parenting expert, I do think it's relevant to point out, she doesn't actually do much of the day-to-day parenting. I'd say the same about a non-resident dad who started posting about his excellent parenting!

She could choose to say a lot of things that were much more authentic, to do with co-parenting when you're the NRP, but for some reason she can't admit that's what she is.
 
Last edited:
New episode of the podcast about “lesbian culture” and how much she and Jaimi love being lesbians. Not enough though that she’ll stop insulting other lesbians, making them out to be bullies and sexual predators, and suggesting that butch women (who have existed since the dawn of time) are just lazy with their appearance/poorly imitating men

witchinghour said:
Her kids live with her ex. He has both of them, even though he is only the biological father of one of them.
Click to expand...

The other biological dad is not in the picture and Jess has written about having to go to court to keep him away from their child because he was abusive
 
witchinghour said:
Her kids live with her ex. He has both of them, even though he is only the biological father of one of them.

The kids do go to Jessica's, but she is the non-resident parent, her ex does the majority of parenting day-to-day.

It's the same as the set up many divorced parents have with their kids, except that it's more usually the woman who's the resident parent and the dad who has them less often.

I don't want to speculate why they have this set up though as I've only heard Jessica's version of it and I no longer trust anything she says. I notice the dad never mentions them publicly. And, they're kids who may well read this thread, or their school mates might. I wish them well and feel uncomfortable speculating on their relationship with their mum, beyond stating basic facts.

But when Jessica styles herself as a parenting expert, I do think it's relevant to point out, she doesn't actually do much of the day-to-day parenting. I'd say the same about a non-resident dad who started posting about his excellent parenting!

She could choose to say a lot of things that were much more authentic, to do with co-parenting when you're the NRP, but for some reason she can't admit that's what she is.
Click to expand...
I get the feeling from Jaimi’s posts that she does a lot of the ‘parenting’ when the boys are with JT. As she also used to do tutoring and has fairly recently completed GCSE’s and A levels ( presumably v successfully, to have got into UoB) I would guess she’s very useful to have as a ‘parent’.
Strangely ironic, considering her usual stance, how JT has ran off with her younger employee, who is now playing housewife and step mum to the part time kids.
I hope none of this impacts Jaimi’s own studies and career.
 
I once found two UG students who had lifted and plagiarised entire chunks of their final dissertations and so, following the policy, I failed them.

I was reprimanded for this, because they were well-liked by the department and were their ‘highest performing students’ (I wonder why).

I argued for weeks that they had stolen work, blatantly copied and pasted it - even trusty old turnitin flagged hundreds of words of stolen work in their dissertations with zero citation.

I escalated this issue up several levels and they assured me they would deal with it.

They didn’t. I eventually resigned in protest around the lack of academic rigour and the lack of fairness and justice for the other students on the course who hadn’t plagiarised - and later found that they had overturned my fail grades and given them firsts. They both graduated with no issues and with high grades.

So, if you’re ever wondering if marking in academia is objective and fair, the answer is a big fat no.

For anyone who is mardy about me sharing this, just know that I don’t care - and I’m sick of the way academia and university is positioned as a meritocracy. Never has been, never will be.

I worked for/with 5 universities during and after my PhD and every single one of them were messing with grades and marking. One of them tried to kick a student off my course because they found out she had been a victim of domestic abuse and they said she wasn’t stable enough to do the module - which was just total prejudice and her performance and grades were brilliant. I fought to keep her on my module because she bleeping deserved to be there.

I talk about some of this in ‘Underclass’ too. I always assumed university would be a meritocracy - but found it was far from it. It’s just one more reason that I don’t want to be part of an institution like that and I would rather stay on my own.

I’m glad I got my PhD and all that (even that was bleeping eventful, as some of you know) but I really dislike so much about academia, the paywalling, the profiteering, the elitism, the classism, the structures, the ownership of knowledge, the cultures and pressures, the corruption, the bullying, the passive aggression, the competition, the territorialism, the misogyny and racism.

Not for me. I can be ‘academic’ and smart without having to attach myself to ‘academia’. I can and already have made huge change, influenced, taught, written books and invested in research without having any university backing me.

JTs latest fever dream.
 
‘I worked for/with 5 universities during and after my PhD and every single one of them were messing with grades and marking. One of them tried to kick a student off my course because they found out she had been a victim of domestic abuse and they said she wasn’t stable enough to do the module - which was just total prejudice and her performance and grades were brilliant. I fought to keep her on my module because she bleeping deserved to be there.’

perhaps these ‘5 Universities’ need to respond to why (if!) they were allowing a poorly qualified person to mark final dissertations, teach modules as well as respond to her other claims about the institutions?
 
wendyg13 said:
‘I worked for/with 5 universities during and after my PhD and every single one of them were messing with grades and marking. One of them tried to kick a student off my course because they found out she had been a victim of domestic abuse and they said she wasn’t stable enough to do the module - which was just total prejudice and her performance and grades were brilliant. I fought to keep her on my module because she bleeping deserved to be there.’

perhaps these ‘5 Universities’ need to respond to why (if!) they were allowing a poorly qualified person to mark final dissertations, teach modules as well as respond to her other claims about the institutions?
Click to expand...

None of these appear to be on any CV?
There are often conversations re students who may be struggling, either to find a way to support, such as deferring/ study break.
Struggling with DV/ mental health would be a valid reason to suggest breaks in study. Keeping someone one a course who may be struggling with life would be highly unethical and make things worse, burnout is common.
 
I think there was probably some truth, that the university had to consider whether it was the best time for the woman to do the course. Even if her grades were amazing, you can still suffer burn out and experience emotional stress.

Working front line as Jess has (never has), she would know that sometimes someone isn't in a place to fully access or admit what they are capable of and people pleasing and not saying no is a typical trait of a woman who has experienced DV. And sometimes you have to step in and say someone isn't in the right place for something, at that time.

If it happened, I don't think it was as described and was without malice. Just a convenient example for Jess to evidence what happened to her was true.
 
Blue bunny said:
I think there was probably some truth, that the university had to consider whether it was the best time for the woman to do the course. Even if her grades were amazing, you can still suffer burn out and experience emotional stress.

Working front line as Jess has (never has), she would know that sometimes someone isn't in a place to fully access or admit what they are capable of and people pleasing and not saying no is a typical trait of a woman who has experienced DV. And sometimes you have to step in and say someone isn't in the right place for something, at that time.

If it happened, I don't think it was as described and was without malice. Just a convenient example for Jess to evidence what happened to her was true.
Click to expand...
Exactly my thoughts. I know people who work in student welfare at Uni’s and that type of decision would have been made at the best interest of the student, to help them through what they were going through at the time. Forcing her to stay on her course, as she makes her look good, rather than supporting her is typical JT.
 
Found this online

Screenshot_20240608_131513_Amazon Shopping.jpg


I wondered if it was Jess, until I saw the review and the fact Jessica R taylor has no interest presence, now I'm convinced if it.

Screenshot_20240608_131502_Amazon Shopping.jpg
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top