Depher/CPH CIC #6 Now I know how Jesus felt

Status
Thread locked. We start a new thread when they have over 1000 posts, click the blue button to see all threads for this topic and find the latest open thread.
1
What the hell is this supposed to be?

1720902272074.png
 
What the hell is this supposed to be?

View attachment 3051966 q


Kneel before me, for I am Ceads.

and if you could just sign here...and here...and here, I'll get it witnessed and you can be sure that your legacy will be put to great use. Have you got an old pair of tights I can use to knock up a lasso shape, love? Now, just hold it up whilst I take a photo...
 
Are they all just trolling now? If so, this shows another layer of complete lunacy doesn’t it.

So basically, unknown persons have stripped DEPHER of their assets and have now set up another CIC doing the same thing? If this is what has happened then they are incredibly stupid and as I’ve said before, it will be their arrogance and inability to walk away when they have the opportunity to do so that will duck them over again.

Every person involved in this is party and complicit in the explication of vulnerable people.

“Kelly”, who for all we know is James in a wig at this point - hang your head in shame. Trying to act as if you are the Good Guy when you are just as bad as him. Even reading the new paperwork; they are attempting to make an entire “business” off the back of giving discount plumbing services to the vulnerable. So basically you want donations to make your plumbing services cheaper for those you deem worthy? duck me, we are through the looking glass now.
 
Setting up the second company suggests they think there is something to salvage. Either there is a viable business there or there are assets they want to transfer over. I just cannot see anyone with any association to Depher successfully fundraising again. Paid work seems unlikely too given the appalling reputation. Which makes me think there are assets left in Depher, such as the house and some cash, that they want to transfer over.
 
Setting up the second company suggests they think there is something to salvage. Either there is a viable business there or there are assets they want to transfer over. I just cannot see anyone with any association to Depher successfully fundraising again. Paid work seems unlikely too given the appalling reputation. Which makes me think there are assets left in Depher, such as the house and some cash, that they want to transfer over.

Always bring the wisdom Seaford. I wait with bated breath to see where those assets end up.

I thought “Kelly” was just winding it up? All gone suspiciously quiet now hasn’t it.
 
Charity scams are the new hot topic, I'm sure they'd love to do a follow up Jimmy:


Just listened to the File on Four about this on BBC Sounds (The Child Rescue Con) then the programme of the same name on iPlayer (shorter! with moving pictures!) which is part of the same series of scam one-off docs of which Jimmy was the first. The parallels are extraordinary. White/Scouse saviour complex, Africa/Burnley as the primitive, unknown land which terribly traffics/neglects its children/ageds/disableds, the deceit, the gold blanket/noose, just for starters. Well worth a listen. As Thomas Aquinas said, as above Burnley, so below Africa.
 
Just listened to the File on Four about this on BBC Sounds (The Child Rescue Con) then the programme of the same name on iPlayer (shorter! with moving pictures!) which is part of the same series of scam one-off docs of which Jimmy was the first. The parallels are extraordinary. White/Scouse saviour complex, Africa/Burnley as the primitive, unknown land which terribly traffics/neglects its children/ageds/disableds, the deceit, the gold blanket/noose, just for starters. Well worth a listen. As Thomas Aquinas said, as above Burnley, so below Africa.
I heard this too. Really shocking stuff but there's a lot of it about.

Lots of familiar behaviours to Depher: misusing photos of vulnerable people without their knowledge or consent to raise money; opening and closing multiple organisations; run-ins with charity regulators; money missing and unaccounted for. Also the reverse victim technique of aggressively lashing out at members of the public and journalists questioning the lies.

I've worked in and with non-profits most of my career and workers sometimes feel resentful at the hoops they have to jump through to satisfy donors and regulators about financial probity. Depher and this child rescue criminal operate in the very grey zones where they're not really charities (so avoid all the hoops of financial transparency) but they convince individual members of the public that they are. Small individual contributions really add up if you pull the heart strings effectively enough. Now that everything is online and a person can donate with one click, these grifts are able to work internationally and steal vast sums.
 
Also the reverse victim technique of aggressively lashing out at members of the public and journalists questioning the lies.

Young Thing 2 yelled out DARVO! at this point <sniffle: so proud>

Good to read this in the article; it is, however, as ever, dodgy charidee whack-a-mole, as we’re seeing right now with St Jim of the Moveable CIC.
The BBC has found that, in 2022, the UK’s Charity Commission rejected an application to register PRC as it had not demonstrated it was exclusively charitable and had failed to respond to what the commission described as “significant issues” with its application.

Mr Whittington also has other charitable organisations registered in The Gambia, Kenya, Ukraine and the Philippines.

PRC was a registered charity in Australia until we told the Australian Charity Commission about our investigation. Its charitable status has now been revoked.[\QUOTE]
 
Status
Thread locked. We start a new thread when they have over 1000 posts, click the blue button to see all threads for this topic and find the latest open thread.
Back
Top