Coronation Street #4

Status
Thread locked. We start a new thread when they have over 1000 posts, click the blue button to see all threads for this topic and find the latest open thread.
1 Sort by date Sort by reaction score 2
Omg this is a joke 🤬 like an above comment said how many times can a soap do an injustice story line. I know the real life justice system is a joke but not very often the wrong verdict like this 🤬 it's obvious they are building up to getting kelly out though, they are trying to make her look as innocent as possible so she can move back to the street
 
Another innocent person sent off to prison 🙄 This will drag out for 6 months now. How can a jury convict with that kind of evidence? Ridiculous. Even if they couldn’t find enough to convict Corey, there’s definitely only circumstantial evidence to convict Kelly. It’s just not realistic at all. Why go to all the bother and drama of Nina recovering her memory of events? Where was the professional evidence to say that such memories can be successfully recovered? Then the question over the dodgy job given to the father of the other lad 🙄🙄🙄 I have sat on jury twice, you need at least 10 people for a majority verdict who must find guilt beyond a reasonable doubt in criminal cases. Yeah Corrie that happened on that kind of flimsy evidence 🙄🙄 and don’t get me started on the prosecution not questioning one of the defendants at all….sloppy research by the writers
 
Surrealoneill said:
Another innocent person sent off to prison 🙄 This will drag out for 6 months now. How can a jury convict with that kind of evidence? Ridiculous. Even if they couldn’t find enough to convict Corey, there’s definitely only circumstantial evidence to convict Kelly. It’s just not realistic at all. Why go to all the bother and drama of Nina recovering her memory of events? Where was the professional evidence to say that such memories can be successfully recovered? Then the question over the dodgy job given to the father of the other lad 🙄🙄🙄 I have sat on jury twice, you need at least 10 people for a majority verdict who must find guilt beyond a reasonable doubt in criminal cases. Yeah Corrie that happened on that kind of flimsy evidence 🙄🙄 and don’t get me started on the prosecution not questioning one of the defendants at all….sloppy research by the writers
Click to expand...
Also the fact Corey got rid of his clothes if that doesn't say GUILTY I don't know what does! If anything they should have found them both guilty.
 
Surrealoneill said:
Another innocent person sent off to prison 🙄 This will drag out for 6 months now. How can a jury convict with that kind of evidence? Ridiculous. Even if they couldn’t find enough to convict Corey, there’s definitely only circumstantial evidence to convict Kelly. It’s just not realistic at all. Why go to all the bother and drama of Nina recovering her memory of events? Where was the professional evidence to say that such memories can be successfully recovered? Then the question over the dodgy job given to the father of the other lad 🙄🙄🙄 I have sat on jury twice, you need at least 10 people for a majority verdict who must find guilt beyond a reasonable doubt in criminal cases. Yeah Corrie that happened on that kind of flimsy evidence 🙄🙄 and don’t get me started on the prosecution not questioning one of the defendants at all….sloppy research by the writers
Click to expand...
Yeah exactly this!! I've not done jury service myself but I've known people who have and I remember my friend doing it about an assault case (not as serious as murder) but they pretty much all agreed the person was guilty from their own opinions but there wasn't enough evidence to find them guilty
 
Leo100 said:
Yeah exactly this!! I've not done jury service myself but I've known people who have and I remember my friend doing it about an assault case (not as serious as murder) but they pretty much all agreed the person was guilty from their own opinions but there wasn't enough evidence to find them guilty
Click to expand...

Until you've sat on a jury and have that responsibility of potentially putting someone in jail for a very long time, you realise how serious your decision is. 'Beyond reasonable doubt' carries a lot of weight in the decision making. Kelly would never have been convicted or at the very least they'd have both been found guilty.

As for Imran .... I'm not angry, just disappointed. 😁
 
FenellaTheWitch said:
He plays the role very well. The younger cast members have done a brilliant job.

The only one doing my head in is Simon. Why is he so involved all of a sudden? I know he got on with Kelly but his involvement seems a bit odd.
Click to expand...
I think they needed him to push the storyline along with Nina remembering things.
 
Status
Thread locked. We start a new thread when they have over 1000 posts, click the blue button to see all threads for this topic and find the latest open thread.
Back
Top