Conor McGregor #14 is a rapist, we stand with Nikita

1
If james lied under oath does she still have to pay his fees?

Lying under oath would be perjury which is a criminal offence, a complaint would need to be made and investigated. As regards this case, it shouldn't have any effect on the issue of costs as, basically, the jury found in his favour.

If he lied, can he not been done for perjury?

Perjury is a criminal offence so an complaint must be made and then investigated for evidence. It is very rare for a prosecution on the basis of perjury.
---
I persume nikitta or mc rapist have to go.to court on Thursday and nits just there legal teams

I would assume just the legal teams as there is only legal argument, I cant see any submissions having been filed but it is the only matter before Owens tomorrow so we may get actual arguments on costs.
 
Last edited:
It's so tricky. He was not guilty of what he was accused of so how could the jury find him liable? Very frustrating. I wish there had been a way to ask the jury if they believe her had sex with her.

Can the judge say that he doesn't believe JL account and therefore he has to pay his own costs? I believe the judge can do what he likes regarding the costs and we all know it is McGregor who will pay them. Although the judge should order that because I wouldn't trust McGregor to leave JL to pay his share or of spite.
 
Back
Top