BBC Radio #2

Status
Thread locked. We start a new thread when they have over 1000 posts, click the blue button to see all threads for this topic and find the latest open thread.
I was listening to BBC WorldService Newshour the other day, they had a report about a Doomsday Cult in Kenya, a church started by a guy who told followers that if they starved themselves they would be able to enter the Gates of Heaven & be closer to Jesus.
Over 100 bodies have been found in a forest owned by the "church" & around 300 more people reported missing.
The 3 leaders of this "church" have been arrested on charges like money laundering, coercion etc, it's thought many of the victims maybe signed over everything they had to this "church" before dying.
:oops:
 
Did anyone listen to Jeremy Vine today? A woman rang in talking about her narcissistic mother (told her daughter she’s ruined her life, that she wanted a boy, wish she’d had an abortion etc). she now doesn’t have contact with he mother. After having a daughter of her own she’s wondering whether to get back in touch. I was so surprised by this ‘expert’ guest they had on who was defending the mother and saying that no one is perfect and children should have a relationship with their grandparents! I thought err no, why should an abusive mother get the opportunity to have a relationship with her grandchild when she barely had one with her own daughter?!

Just had to get that out because I thought the guest was so wrong and out of order!
 
Did anyone listen to Jeremy Vine today? A woman rang in talking about her narcissistic mother (told her daughter she’s ruined her life, that she wanted a boy, wish she’d had an abortion etc). she now doesn’t have contact with he mother. After having a daughter of her own she’s wondering whether to get back in touch. I was so surprised by this ‘expert’ guest they had on who was defending the mother and saying that no one is perfect and children should have a relationship with their grandparents! I thought err no, why should an abusive mother get the opportunity to have a relationship with her grandchild when she barely had one with her own daughter?!

Just had to get that out because I thought the guest was so wrong and out of order!
I will go back & listen
 
I've been reading a lot about the huge changes and cuts to BBC local radio, and the process is, as many involved have described, brutal. Having worked in a company that underwent a drawn-out buyout procedure, then complete restructure with the loss of many locations and jobs, I know it's so stressful to be in limbo for many months while you wait for the axe to fall, seeing colleagues crumble, warned to keep shtoom in front of clients, feeling like a performing seal reapplying for your job if you want to keep it, or feeling disposable when you decide to move aside. A cruel process but not uncommon in the private sector sadly.

Those who are losing their BBC local radio jobs must of course be concerned for their own livelihoods but most are selflessly focusing on how the new digital-first policy will affect the listeners, highlighting the importance of local radio as an essential service. They have apparently been told not to mention anything about it all on air but are doing their best to get their feelings out there, on Twitter, writing open letters to the higher-ups and to MPs etc. The welfare of the listeners is a genuine concern to them, knowing the true power and value of local radio, for those who can't - or don't want to - get their social contact or information digitally. I understand this completely, I have a million ways to get info and entertainment digitally but sometimes you just want to use your ears only, hear someone local talking live about something local with a few random tunes and a cheery, engaged, caring presenter, who is smart enough to get serious when necessary. Not much to ask and it should be cheap enough to keep going for those who need it, along with the new stuff.

However the above does not relate to one BBC presenter whose defiant, pass-agg on-air mentions of the Beeb's changes allude only to how it affects her, her routine, her uncertainty, her sleep, her income, her career, her ego. She won't give her listeners a second thought when she's gone, unless they can be of use to her in some other way. Who? Jo Good, aka @middleagedminx on her monetised social media channels.

Jo Good's shows will be no loss to local radio, they do not serve the local listenership as remitted to. She uses BBC Radio London to talk mainly about herself, her mates, her personal admin, domestic and consumer gripes. Her callers and emailers are a small cabal of stans who are allowed airtime to shower her with compliments. It seems the main reason she shows up to a shift is to exploit the airwaves as a market stall to spruik her own ad-heavy social platforms, what with the constant name checking of brands she works for outside of the BBC, and shout-outs of her personal social media handle, a self-declared influencer now.
20230514_114203.jpg
 
Last edited:
Caught the tail end of Jo Good's BBC Radio London show last night. She doesn't half big herself up about her fashion shoot with a (named) company who she does paid work for. Of course she did it humble-brag style, all 'isn't it great they want me even though I'm 68' blah blah blah.

But it's more than her usual LOOK AT ME posing, it effectively constitutes free advertising on the BBC for her side-hustle employer.
 
I do love the randomness of the music choices on Radio 2. Yesterday afternoon I was half listening to a heart felt chat on the great Tina Turner whilst cleaning. The segment ended with playing Simply The Best. Then was swiftly followed by Nirvana's Smells Like Teen Spirit which was quite a contrast 😂
 
Listening to Jo Good on the radio last night has got me thinking, probably prompted by all the Phil Schofield stuff, that perhaps she enjoys some sort of protected or favoured status at the Beeb. I don't mean about her job with the imminent sweeping cuts to the whole of local radio, but regarding what she has got away with on air for years, ie the commercial promotion of her other non-BBC employers. Are there any other examples of presenters giving such obvious free advertising on the BBC? Who has been turning a blind eye?

The question now being asked about Phil and Holly's queuegate - has anyone has actually seen the filmed piece they claimed was the reason they were swiftly admitted to the lying-in-state? - reminds me of Jo Good's claim to be doing a piece for her radio show when she openly flouted the stay local covid restrictions, filming herself driving near Parliament Square on the way to Nunhead. She stated it was for a BBC radio piece - which, funny that, never appeared - however her vlog showed her in Nunhead cemetery meeting a friend with a dog who lives in the area. All the receipts are on Tattle.
 
Last edited:
Status
Thread locked. We start a new thread when they have over 1000 posts, click the blue button to see all threads for this topic and find the latest open thread.
Back
Top