Anna Bey #24 A-list bully, ID-info stealer, fake marriage, running away from Swiss police

Status
Thread locked. We start a new thread when they have over 1000 posts, click the blue button to see all threads for this topic and find the latest open thread.
1
Lauren posted a picture of this iconic dress, all pressed and ironed. That blue looks fantastic on her if I might add. Anna butchered it by wearing the dress all wrinkled and with some ridiculous sunglasses.

Where is that pink steamer everyone keeps talking about? She really doesn't follow her own advice.

inCollage_20210911_233041027.jpg
 
Last edited:
As promised, @Bastine de Beaumanoir here are screenshots of her stories. Anna is back in Geneva in her office/solo home. She has also had a personal training session, but she probably didn't pay for it!
I guess Joseph isn't really doing it for her anymore...
View attachment 757477 q
Anna paid for him. She even foreshadowed that she will be paying in a specific way in one of her 'etiquette' videos.
 
Lauren posted a picture of this iconic dress, all pressed and ironed. That blue looks fantastic on her if I might add. Anna butchered it by wearing the dress all wrinkled and with some ridiculous sunglasses.

Where is that pink steamer everyone keeps talking about? She really doesn't follow her own advice.

View attachment 757574 q
She is psychotic. She wanted two differing goals when she took this: to make herself look good, but also to make Lauren's fashion line look bad. So she made a nonsensical post deliberately wearing it unironed straight out of the box. She probably made sure to sit down and move a lot to make wrinkles. Finally, she also didn't get the right size so her belly was stretching the limits

It must be heaven for her having a sexy man to look at even if he is with her to advertise his personal training services!
 
Hello ladiez. I would like to contribute a tiny bit again to the Tattle bible of how to be elegant / look groomed for real. At zero cost, we know that Tattle has more useful advice than any of the Scam of influence videos / courses. We are having a lovely Saturday here in London, last bits of the Summer. I have my matcha ready, a good piece of cake and I'm ready to write down some stuff.

I've been thinking lately about how Anna and similar fake-gurus / "influencers" don't know much about Modern Luxury and Modern Elegance, which are separate topics in terms of style than etiquette.

Anna just thinks that elegance needs to fits certain strict rules when in reality, modern day elegance has mutated into different shapes that we can see reflected on new luxury brands, real A-listers and even on royalty figures.

What the F I am talking about? I am talking about the new wave of modern day elegance that goes beyond being overdressed or wearing what were considered elegant outfits just a few decades ago.
Let's picture it with a few examples.

A few years ago, the Olsen twins, that were huge celebrities in the 00's, decided to focus on fashion and decided to launch their own luxury fashion brand: The Row.
For instance, you cannot speak about modern day luxury and elegance without acknowledging the huge impact those twins had with their clothing line and how this trend now has a huge impact on similar boutiques. Love them or hate them, they are fashion icons and have a 500 million dollar (self made) on their backs.

We can define The Row as "the mystery of how the hell pays £600 for a basic cotton t-shirt".

The answer is: (mostly, not Anna :sneaky:) but... a lot of wealthy businesswoman & businessman, old money folks, REALLY wealthy people, are keen to pay an astronomical amount of money for high quality designer basics.
The Row has a selection of almost the best quality you may find in terms of basics, they have wonderful designs and you can find low key basics and also eccentric pieces to complement your style.
All their pieces are manufactured in the USA or Italy. They only use the very best materials.

There's a wonderful article from The Cut that digs deeper on how boutiques like The Row and Hermès have survived the pandemic: https://www.thecut.com/2021/03/mary-kate-ashley-olsen-the-row.html - the reality of it is that the real elite or those wealthy managers worked the whole pandemic as nothing was really going on and they kept spending their money on their famous £600 t-shirts.

The Row impact has triggered that similar brands now have their own collections of high quality basics: Acne Studios, Totême and even well known boutiques as Chloé have launched wonderful lines based on the necessity of good old basics without flashy logos. If you dig the ready to wear collections of Chanel, Dior, etc, you may also find similar pieces that are not the ones you may see Influenzesss wearing. But if you pay attention, you may spot them on business people, walking around the city and so on. Balmain Blazer, Chloé wool pants, Chanel flats, Dior scarf, no flashy logos. 10/10 look.

Those brands follow the motto that Bastine and others have pointed out here: well ironed shirts, neutrals, leather goods. It makes a good outfit with very little effort. I mean: the effort stays on having the eye to spot how to make the outfit and knowing how to spot good quality items. Falling into the "I need a flashy Gucci or Chanel bag" while you don't have a good shirt + wool/cashmere pants/scarfs it's... a trap! Don't fall for it.

Now.. Why is that Anna hasn't been invited to The Row boutiques? Or why doesn't she spends a few thousands per collection to "stay in" the basics that rule the seasson?
I will throw here a few "it" items from the last few months that I haven't spot Anna wearing. Prada and The Row mules. Bottega Veneta pouch. Totême shirts. Jimmy Choo boots. Jacquemus leather goods (not the mini bags that everyone has but their real-leather classic bags).

As always, wouldn't botter if Anna appears next week with all of these items. The point here is that she is always out of style! She doesn't have a clue about what real affluent folks are wearing besides the flashy logos her eyes spot and hermessas.

Another peculiarity of the brands that I mentioned is that is not easy to spot second hand or vintage items and even if you find a second hand The Row, the price is not cheap. Those brands don't have real "sales", not to the extent of Hermès, but you will not find, let's say, "cheap" The Row leather bags.
Anna just can't fake to belong or understand modern day elegance leaded by those high end brands, she can't afford it.

As she doesn't have the knowledge and never got over her "fake it till you make it" phase (That BTW, it doesn't work gals, that's just bad advice) I don't think Anna can spot if someone is wearing a head-to-toe The Row uniform. Again, that's the point of not wearing flashy logos. When you can afford a £10,000 outfit of high quality basics, last thing you'd like is posers like Anna coming to you 😂 you are not going out to the world to "flex", you don't need to.

Anna, that can't even stop uploading Restaurant's menus (Anna, if you are reading this, STOP), would never understand. Why would you spent that amount of money to wear an outfit with no logos?

But guess what? As always, those of you who know, know - I can easily spot a classic The Row bag or a Chloè coat. Those a timeless classics. I also know that wearing a good quality basic t-shirt sends the correct message to the world: I am not trying hard (as Anna with her prom dresses :alien:), I am just chilling in my well presented outift.

I relate to the anecdote of having people coming to talk to me when I am wearing really simple outfits.
But even my "low effort" outfits are: my size, ironed, clean, I don't have fillers, I follow a skin - hair care routine and I look well groomed. Organic cotton shirts, black leather, a few designer classics with no flashy logos, a smile, a cup of coffee and a good book. You can provide a good chat to everyone. That's the vibe. You will be a magnet of people! I promise you!

I can't even imagine her going to those boutiques with her clown outfits and terrible fillers.

The Sales Associates know how to spot posers 1000 miles away. They will not offer you the same treatment darling. And please, don't make a lenghty post about how "the service was bad". Is not that the service is bad, is that you don't fit and you are not even trying.

How many posts with free advice can we give you till you recognise that your "etiquette course" is useless?

Next post I'd like to make a few points about the other side of Modern Day Elegance that goes well into the eccentric folks that wear head-to-toe haute couture Gucci and independent designer brands. It's something that Anna obviously doesn't understand at all, but here in London there are many artists and wealthy folks that you wouldn't guess how much the earn and you could think "they are freaks" but nah, they are artistic sensitive individuals that reign on the art scene here in London and in every well known city all over the world. It's just another huge part of "why the Anna's networking course actually will make people hate you".

Anna's Course survivors: you need to deprogramme yourself from all that BS, we are here for you.
 
Totally agree. And it also depends on personality. I have such a snobby cold attitude (I don't mean to be like that) and it helps me to humble myself with outfits that don't also add to this attitude. So it really depends on personality and where you're going. If I see a guy in a coffee shop wearing a suit on a Sunday, I'd think he is there for work so he has to work on a Sunday ...
If I see someone like Anna in one of her dresses at a coffee shop on a weekend, I'd think she is a salesperson at a jewelry store because they often have to wear office formal dresses even on the weekends.
Oftentimes (it can change), affluent people are very casual during the weekend. Both attitude and outfits ..

Yes! One of my senior colleagues goes sailing and horse riding on the weekend often, looking both casual and graceful and yet still fashionable in a way that can’t be imitated.
 
I hate to say this but this image turned me off Gucci (and flashy logos) forever: I watched the news in Afghanistan and watched as a woman in head to toe Gucci struggled to find a plane ride out before the Americans left. The image of a refugee in Gucci really left a weird taste in my mouth. Brands and logos do not automatically signal a good and prosperous life!
 
In mood for analysis.
I don’t want to be sharp with people who are trying to make a living, I respect people who want to work honestly. But having its name associated with Anna Bey is attracting attention to oneself and not in the good manner. I’ve just verified the Insta of that coach. I don’t have Insta so I am not able to see the detail, but I can see his profile.

This guy is nobody, he is a guy from EE who tries to brand himself like a coach, pretending to have diplomas and trainings impossible to verify (psysical ed. degree +Osteopaty) like many other EE guys addicted to gyms, who are trying to come to Western Europe through a first level of a competition related to MMA.
He put the flag of Italy and Switzerland but he lives in France, don’t speak well : « free lesson on Geneva » is the literal translation of a way of speaking at the France/Geneva border, typical of recent immigrants or of people with little education in French. It’s typical for exemple of Gaillard, Ambilly and Annemasse where many sports halls are and which concentrate this kind of young men.
TCIO is a school in Milan, so nobody will be able to verify him as well as his « degree pysical ed. » (from where ?). But the fact that he is pretending to speak Italian, it rings a bell, he must be Romanian from the North side of the country where they have Russian names. Among the EE countries Romanian prefer to immigrate first in Italy or Spain because they are able to speak very quickly the language. In any case, if he can stay in France, he must be EU.

I would like to advice this boy to not use the name vitalfit to designate himself on Insta. If he is not officially and currently related with the brand Vitalfit, it could get him in BIG trouble. We don’t want to be seen like a scammer who helps other scammer, isn’t it ? Maybe those two know themselves from the same Ibis-budget hotel in Annemasse ? Or Appart’City at the border with Geneva ? Oh, my dear, what a change from the 4 Seasons….
 
I hate to say this but this image turned me off Gucci (and flashy logos) forever: I watched the news in Afghanistan and watched as a woman in head to toe Gucci struggled to find a plane ride out before the Americans left. The image of a refugee in Gucci really left a weird taste in my mouth. Brands and logos do not automatically signal a good and prosperous life!
As someone said a few threads ago. Wearing crosses doesn’t make you a saint, just like wearing logos doesn’t make you rich
 
Silk pillowcases … I was keen to buy one until I started reading the reviews. They don’t actually do anything.

I think it depends on your needs. It certainly doesn't grant any miracles! I've been using them for 3 years and I'd recommend them if you have concerns about friction on the hair, dry skin, or you use a night skin routine that does not absorb so quickly (the material will not draw it off your face so much). It has a cool and comfortable sensation for those who have a tendency to feel overheated at night too.
 
All the people related to Anna fall into the following categories:

1) They don't know well who she is and once they Google her name they tend to try to politely stay away from her.

2) They know her well but they are scammers / suspicious folks as well. They get along among each other.

3) They are playing with Anna. They found her funny for some reason. Line is the biggest example.
 
Ladies, can we please donate some clothes to Anna?
It's so sad to look at this miserable tasteless creature.

The stench of "nouveau riche" in her makes nouveau riche people go back home and take a bath. (Get it?)
What's the point of using status symbol to elevate whatever that rotten flesh conceales or to reproduce someone else's standard when in every block around there is another woman or a bunch of women with the same stuff and worse in her case with genuine stuff? :ROFLMAO:
 
It looks like a tablecloth. And to answer @hereforitall I think it's because of the juxtaposition of a brand that wants to look luxurious and important (like to make a person look like they have their life completely together) and someone in need of serious help and assistance.
Of course, you can have your opinion about things and that's fine. But if I recommend an opinion for you, you might be mixing things if you think a refugee doesn't have their life together or doesn't deserve to wear the same brands as you because they are in a background that looks and is messy. In my opinion, that's something Anna would say about those "black women"

I am a refugee and even though I have come a long way after being in the US for many many years, I don't get offended by an opinion like yours. Because I have met people in my life that think a certain way about refugees just like you. It's not my fight to fight, it's theirs.

The truth is we are living in a world that is starting to really understand and value differences and people who can't keep up will only hurt themselves. They stop wearing brands they like because a refugee is wearing it or they might miss out on great opportunities and meeting people because they don't want to associate themselves with those people and so on ..

So throughout the years, I've learned to not let it offend me because I'm not the affected party here. So my comment on this is a hope for you to maybe start to think a little differently about refugees and people from countries that don't seem to have their life completely together.

Another perspective, if I may add, is if I see someone fighting for their life, I wouldn't want to comment on their outfit! It's poor taste.

And btw, Gucci was never a true luxury brand. Their target market has always been people who have to save for months in order to afford a piece from them. So is LV. Or new money. As I've mentioned before, I know girls who make less than $50K a year and they have multiple Gucci products. A woman in her 30s that makes less than $50K while living in a country of opportunities and still prioritizes to buy Gucci rather than invest in her education doesn't seem to be any better in having their life together than that woman you were describing!
 
Status
Thread locked. We start a new thread when they have over 1000 posts, click the blue button to see all threads for this topic and find the latest open thread.
Back
Top