Wolfnsunflowers #3 Calm down Joan of Arc

Status
Thread locked. We start a new thread when they have over 1000 posts, click the blue button to see all threads for this topic and find the latest open thread.
1
I can only do likes at this second: if I press in my usual way to other emojis it just offers me a menu of copy links etc.

Please be assured I'm Actually Laughing.

We are funny fuckers and we haven't stolen/spent £6000 pounds for a scrambled eggs brochure.

However shocking it is to you, £6k is AUD11,593 at today's exchange rate. IT'S SO MUCH STOLEN MONEY!
9.8 MILLION South Korean Won. Really makes you think.
 
What did she do to you? (Genuinely asking, not being an asshole here).

Also, what the duck are lavender hugs? Does this happen at 'the club'?

I’m one of a group of women who had a private chat in messenger many moons ago. We all knew Rebecca through a parenting group and talked about her tweets in a similar way in which they are spoken of in here. At times we
got personal as is human nature I suppose.

One of the group also submitted a report to SS regarding her child who she regularly tweeted she left to get up and look after/feed himself (in a house with an unfed and under stimulated Husky). She bragged of binge drinking, making content for her SW account with strangers whilst her child was in the house, a whole host of things. The report was made out of genuine concern - we simply noticed the neglect still observed on these threads regularly and the group member who made the report was duty bound to do so due to their role at the time.

One of the group went rogue and sent Rebecca screenshots, a total of (I think) 42 over a two year period. It was a busy daily chat so was hardly ‘obsessed’ with her as she claims, particularly given how often she tweets.

Rebecca was rightly upset to read these. However she then proceeded to dox us, contact our employers with the aim of having us disciplined or sacked, harassing our friends and family members, to the extent that she was warned by the police and made to take our details down. She maintains to this day that we were the bullies (despite the fact she was never meant to see the chat AND that the report was taken seriously enough to prompt a welfare check) and that she is the innocent victim. As always.
 
I’m one of a group of women who had a private chat in messenger many moons ago. We all knew Rebecca through a parenting group and talked about her tweets in a similar way in which they are spoken of in here. At times we
got personal as is human nature I suppose.

One of the group also submitted a report to SS regarding her child who she regularly tweeted she left to get up and look after/feed himself (in a house with an unfed and under stimulated Husky). She bragged of binge drinking, making content for her SW account with strangers whilst her child was in the house, a whole host of things. The report was made out of genuine concern - we simply noticed the neglect still observed on these threads regularly and the group member who made the report was duty bound to do so due to their role at the time.

One of the group went rogue and sent Rebecca screenshots, a total of (I think) 42 over a two year period. It was a busy daily chat so was hardly ‘obsessed’ with her as she claims, particularly given how often she tweets.

Rebecca was rightly upset to read these. However she then proceeded to dox us, contact our employers with the aim of having us disciplined or sacked, harassing our friends and family members, to the extent that she was warned by the police and made to take our details down. She maintains to this day that we were the bullies (despite the fact she was never meant to see the chat AND that the report was taken seriously enough to prompt a welfare check) and that she is the innocent victim. As always.

Obviously, I can understand why she was upset but wow I am sorry she took it to such an extreme with you guys. That must have been ridiculously stressful for you all, and all over something which, let’s face it, everyone does. All made 1000x worse by her “I’m the victim” narrative.

I’m not expecting her to do some sort of “tattle we’re right” post but the amount she reads here I just cannot understand how she fails to see time and time again her behaviour is wrong, and it’s her behaviour that caused us all to be here discussing her in the first place. I always thought Bex actually seemed ok as a person but reading the above it’s quite apparent she’s not.

If you do insist on reading here ALL OF THE TIME BEX then you can’t get the hump about what people say.
 
Christ, that is wild. I can understand the lady who had to report, it's a fine balance that one sometimes if you work in a safeguarding role.

The thing is, the Twitter account is unfortunately going to lend itself to similar situations in college/uni/work/volunteering as it's just a total overshare and people are always, always going to have opinions on it. As upsetting as I'm sure Social Care contact would have been, surely when that was sorted then you'd be looking to lock down the social media, do a bit of reflecting and think about who you're internet friends with (if indeed you were all 'friends', if not, meh, tit happens, people talk).

Curious as to why one of the group went rogue mind.
 
Curious as to why one of the group went rogue mind.

She was a dormant member of the group and we’d forgotten all about her to be honest.

She had previously been subject to an SS report from someone on the internet herself - having admitted to being violent in a fit of rage to her own child.

I know which side of history I’d rather be on.
 
I’m one of a group of women who had a private chat in messenger many moons ago. We all knew Rebecca through a parenting group and talked about her tweets in a similar way in which they are spoken of in here. At times we
got personal as is human nature I suppose.

One of the group also submitted a report to SS regarding her child who she regularly tweeted she left to get up and look after/feed himself (in a house with an unfed and under stimulated Husky). She bragged of binge drinking, making content for her SW account with strangers whilst her child was in the house, a whole host of things. The report was made out of genuine concern - we simply noticed the neglect still observed on these threads regularly and the group member who made the report was duty bound to do so due to their role at the time.

One of the group went rogue and sent Rebecca screenshots, a total of (I think) 42 over a two year period. It was a busy daily chat so was hardly ‘obsessed’ with her as she claims, particularly given how often she tweets.

Rebecca was rightly upset to read these. However she then proceeded to dox us, contact our employers with the aim of having us disciplined or sacked, harassing our friends and family members, to the extent that she was warned by the police and made to take our details down. She maintains to this day that we were the bullies (despite the fact she was never meant to see the chat AND that the report was taken seriously enough to prompt a welfare check) and that she is the innocent victim. As always.

This all happened just after I found Bex. It's why I took such an interest - that's and the fact I'm just dead nosey. 🤣

You think her Twitter is bad now? It was wild in those days and nobody was scrutinising her like they are now this thread exists. She simply waltzed around doing whatever the f*ck she liked and screwing people over.

This might be a gossip site and all good fun but it actually kinda polices the grifting to some extent and boy was it needed.

Iirc she reported it to the police herself as disability hate crime harrassment because she's neurodiverse but then ended up on the receiving end of the police warning. Of course she then needed a Go Fund Me for legal fees to take Those Women ™️ to court.


Then she had a 'stroke' which turned out to be a migraine after she'd successfully grifted a few more quid and a couple of takeaways for her pain. 🤣

Anyway, I'm glad she's under scrutiny and not as able to fling her muck about and con folk as she once was.
 
Imagine if you knew a potential hazard (hungry under exercised dog) was cooped up with a small child - being left alone for prolonged periods by a mum that needs to get rogered for a living and because she pretends to be highly sexed (when she means of course, desperate to hold on to a man, any man) and you DID NOT report it. If/when the inevitable happened, you would be both culpable and feel bereft with guilt.

The cost benefit analysis of reporting outweighs not reporting even without any other personal opinion or knowledge involved.
 
This all happened just after I found Bex. It's why I took such an interest - that's and the fact I'm just dead nosey. 🤣

You think her Twitter is bad now? It was wild in those days and nobody was scrutinising her like they are now this thread exists. She simply waltzed around doing whatever the f*ck she liked and screwing people over.

This might be a gossip site and all good fun but it actually kinda polices the grifting to some extent and boy was it needed.

Iirc she reported it to the police herself as disability hate crime harrassment because she's neurodiverse but then ended up on the receiving end of the police warning. Of course she then needed a Go Fund Me for legal fees to take Those Women ™️ to court.


Then she had a 'stroke' which turned out to be a migraine after she'd successfully grifted a few more quid and a couple of takeaways for her pain. 🤣

Anyway, I'm glad she's under scrutiny and not as able to fling her muck about and con folk as she once was.
Ironically she seems to have grown up very slightly. Not much, admittedly.
 
This all happened just after I found Bex. It's why I took such an interest - that's and the fact I'm just dead nosey. 🤣

You think her Twitter is bad now? It was wild in those days and nobody was scrutinising her like they are now this thread exists. She simply waltzed around doing whatever the f*ck she liked and screwing people over.

This might be a gossip site and all good fun but it actually kinda polices the grifting to some extent and boy was it needed.

Iirc she reported it to the police herself as disability hate crime harrassment because she's neurodiverse but then ended up on the receiving end of the police warning. Of course she then needed a Go Fund Me for legal fees to take Those Women ™️ to court.


Then she had a 'stroke' which turned out to be a migraine after she'd successfully grifted a few more quid and a couple of takeaways for her pain. 🤣

Anyway, I'm glad she's under scrutiny and not as able to fling her muck about and con folk as she once was.
The GoFundme was also to help fund her start her childcare career I see. So what happened to the money and to the career? :unsure:
Though who would leave their child with her? She doesn't seem to look after her own much, and certainly never seems to gain any pleasure from it.
 
Mmm yeah I do wonder where the money from that GFM went. To be honest, I had pondered the dog thing as it did cross my mind re: the lie ins and the little fella getting up early. I have an old boy who would happily stay in bed until ten, but if anyone was up before then he'd be after a wee and his scran (I'd also always watch him with kids, despite him having about three teeth and his breath being more dangerous than anything else 🤣).
---
Oh old boy being a dog, not a child with three teeth and halitosis.
 
I am so thoroughly amused that you think that's the anon account, and relieved you didn't find the real one. Goodnight.

Hi Rebecca, why would anyone who isn’t actually you be relieved your anon account hasn’t been found*?

Talk about telling on yourself 🤣


* it blatantly has, but let’s play devil’s advocate for a second.
 
CHILDCARE CAREER????



Christ alive, they'd all be looking after each other

She claimed that the SS report put paid to the childcare career and prevented her from registering or something like that. More 'woe is me, so hard done, by here's my wishlist/PayPal' opportunity that way.

She also claimed that SS laughed about the report with her over the phone and said it was nonsense. I forget the exact wording but yet again it didn't seem to sit together quite as she explained it. 🤣
 
She claimed that the SS report put paid to the childcare career and prevented her from registering or something like that. More 'woe is me, so hard done, by here's my wishlist/PayPal' opportunity that way.

She also claimed that SS laughed about the report with her over the phone and said it was nonsense. I forget the exact wording but yet again it didn't seem to sit together quite as she explained it. 🤣

As I recall, it was OFSTED saying she’d have to be free from SS reports for 12 months.

Clearly a bridge too far for our resident supernanny.

Parents among us; imagine leaving your kid(s) in her care. Let alone paying through the nose for the privilege.
 
“Right kiddies, today we’ll be learning about how to take £6k of other people’s money for a cookbook, spend it all on McDonald’s and Shein, then make as many excuses as possible as to why the cookbook never appears! Extra credit will be rewarded if you help me come up with my latest cringe Twitter name”
 
“Right kiddies, today we’ll be learning about how to take £6k of other people’s money for a cookbook, spend it all on McDonald’s and Shein, then make as many excuses as possible as to why the cookbook never appears! Extra credit will be rewarded if you help me come up with my latest cringe Twitter name”
'You all get on with it while I go back to bed. I've been up since midday'.
 
Status
Thread locked. We start a new thread when they have over 1000 posts, click the blue button to see all threads for this topic and find the latest open thread.
Back
Top