Unsolved Mysteries - Netflix

1 Sort by date Sort by reaction score 2
Agree about the Tiffany case - I do think that was a suicide.

Pat Mullins I'm not sure - we can never know what someone is thinking so his family saying he wouldn't commit suicide sadly doesn't sway me. It was similar with the Tiffany case.
 
quinzel said:
Agree about the Tiffany case - I do think that was a suicide.

Pat Mullins I'm not sure - we can never know what someone is thinking so his family saying he wouldn't commit suicide sadly doesn't sway me. It was similar with the Tiffany case.
Click to expand...
Reading up on Reddit I agree with people on there saying Pat witnessed something he shouldn’t on the water, probably drug related and the family friend with the drug addiction knew something. The corrupt camera files felt like too much of a coincidence cause they’ll probably all be in on what goes on on those waters.
 
hehehe said:
Some of the unrecoverable items of clothing were unrecoverable because quite frankly there were pieces of her all over the woods for several kilometres. Some of it must have been picked up by animals. Train impact deaths are horrendous. Her uncle's search party was finding pieces everywhere weeks after the tragedy and most of her body didn't make it to the cremation. Dumping her phone, stripping some clothes off as she headed to her death are consistent with someone in the full grip of mental illness.

Nothing unsolved or mysterious about it except how her parents are now getting all the goodwill despite having a hand in her terrible mental state.
Click to expand...
I would say the clean feet is a bit mysterious. If she had been walking along the tracks / in a wooded area shoeless, would there not be evidence of that on her feet?
 
Yes I was just about to ask about the clean feet. Shoes found some distance away (over a mile?) and yet her feet were not consistent with having walked it. Also didn’t they say the feet were cut as if cut off by something NOT the train?

barbiegirl2000 said:
Reading up on Reddit I agree with people on there saying Pat witnessed something he shouldn’t on the water, probably drug related and the family friend with the drug addiction knew something. The corrupt camera files felt like too much of a coincidence cause they’ll probably all be in on what goes on on those waters.
Click to expand...
100% what I think too. The waterways must be a major drugs entrance.
 
Just my opinion, but this 3rd season has felt a bit weak and disjointed compared to the previous two.

The episode about parental kidnapping was of course sad but didn’t really fit with the series theme. Compared to Prior episodes like the hotel rooftop jump one, this hasn’t really felt like it’s hit those kind of notes.

A shame, because there is surely endless source material from around the world. I worked in a coroners office earlier in my career and it was such an eye opener to see the bizarre cases that were referred to us in a relatively small jurisdiction.
 
New season.

I don't know why they make these episodes so bloody long for one case each. The original would tackle more than one case per episode.

I've slogged through the first 2 eps.

Jack the Ripper -- really? What a waste of an hour. There are thousands of documentaries on this case and NOTHING new here. Unless Jesus himself tells us who did it, people need to just let this case go. It'll never be solved.

Amanda -- the investigator really thinks this was an accident? I mean, no. But you can see why it hasn't been solved. All the "experts" sounded like 9 year olds doing a jigsaw, putting random pieces together and just guessing a bunch of tit. Seems a lot of information was left out. And we didn't really need to hear from her brothers, I don't know why they got so much screen time. The husband -- why did they go to the trouble of making him look shady in the beginning only to turn around with oh he's here to tell his story so he couldn't possibly be involved?
 
The second episode has left me with so many questions.
The neighbours heard the dog barking and then heard a yell. Why not go check everything was ok?
Was the dog not barking wanting food and to go outside in the two days before the husband got back? Why weren’t there paw prints in the basement?
The husband didn’t seem to have anything to gain from her death so don’t see him being involved.
 
barbiegirl2000 said:
The second episode has left me with so many questions.
The neighbours heard the dog barking and then heard a yell. Why not go check everything was ok?
Was the dog not barking wanting food and to go outside in the two days before the husband got back? Why weren’t there paw prints in the basement?
The husband didn’t seem to have anything to gain from her death so don’t see him being involved.
Click to expand...
This actually happens a lot. People assume it’s a domestic situation so don’t call the police or knock the door to ask if everything is ok. 😞

It looked like A LOT of blood, but I guess if she had bled out for days, it would be a lot? Really confusing case. Hopefully answers will come.
 
The thing is, at some point the piggy bank made contact with her head and there were pieces of it on the stairs. So if she was dazed by the migraine and hit her head on the piggy bank and fell, and it was an accident, why wasn't there any blood spatter on the shelf where the piggy bank was or a trail of blood on the stairs/in the staircase leading down?

My guess is someone chased her from the dining room down to the basement, halfway down they grabbed the piggy bank and hit her on the head, so there were pieces on the stairs, but she made a single fall from that spot down to the floor of the basement which is where all the blood was. The attacker saw her bleeding and left, replacing the piggy bank, and the rest is as we're told.

The dent in the wall from the piggybank could have been there long before Amanda died. And I'm not buying that all the settled dust on the piggybank was in perfect condition as the investigator said. Plus the attacker could've been wearing gloves leaving no fingerprints. Maybe once they knew Lee had left, they came in to commit SA and only intended to subdue Amanda with the knock on her head, and when they saw she was potentially dead they ran away.

I'm not buying that it was just her DNA they found down there, that's ridiculous. Lee lived there too, so his DNA must have been there, plus whomever lived in the house before them, etc etc. I don't know how much of the crime scene they tested, they certainly couldn't have tested every inch of the blood spatter.

This is why I say that a lot of information has been left out, as Netflix has done in previous episodes of UM. I don't know why they brought the series back just to set up the episodes like some dramatic fiction pushing a narrative instead of just reporting the facts.

I didn't bother with the rest of the episodes.
 
barbiegirl2000 said:
The second episode has left me with so many questions.
The neighbours heard the dog barking and then heard a yell. Why not go check everything was ok?
Was the dog not barking wanting food and to go outside in the two days before the husband got back? Why weren’t there paw prints in the basement?
The husband didn’t seem to have anything to gain from her death so don’t see him being involved.
Click to expand...

And why didn't the husband immediately rushed back home or asked someone to check on her after the abrupt end of the phone call and not being able to contact her? Why did he only come back home two days later?

I agree that the Jack The Ripper one was a waste of an episode. I also really don't care for supernatural characters, like the freaking mothman. Give me REAL stuff that are true misteries, not folklore.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top